Microwave Irradiation of Candidal Adhesion and Biofilm on Polymethylmethacrylate Resin

Article Preview

Abstract:

This 3 phase study examined (1) the effect of microwave irradiation on the adhesion and (2) biofilm formation of 4 candidal species on heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) specimens. Lastly, (3) the flexural strength of heat polymerized PMMA was tested.C. albicans (ATCC 10231), C. glabrata (ATCC 22019), C. krusei (ATCC 6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 90030) were used. The flexural strength of the PMMA resin after microwave irradiation was tested in accordance with ISO 20795-1 specifications. A one-way ANOVA statistical analysis was used for all the results.The maximum effect of 94% to 98% reduction in adhesion and biofilm counts was seen with microwave irradiation at 850 W and 1000 W for 120 sec. There was no significant difference between the control and irradiated specimens in terms of flexural strength. Reduction of candida adhesion and biofilm on PMMA resin can be achieved with microwave irradiation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

73-77

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Vol. 33 (2005), p.81.

Google Scholar

[2] Cahn LR. Ann Dent Vol. 3 (1936), p.33.

Google Scholar

[3] Ferreira MA, Pereira-Cenci T, Rodrigues de Vasconcelos LM, Rodrigues-Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Clin Oral Investig Vol. 13 (2009), p.237.

DOI: 10.1007/s00784-008-0220-x

Google Scholar

[4] Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Wilcox MDP, Harty DWS, Knox KW. Australian Dental Journal Vol. 43 (1998), p.160.

Google Scholar

[5] Arendorf TM, Walker DM. J Oral Rehabil Vol. 14 (1987), p.217.

Google Scholar

[6] Taylor R, Maryan C, Verran J. J Prosthet Dent Vol. 80 (1998), p.592.

Google Scholar

[7] Kuamoto CA. Curr Opin Microbiol Vol. 5 (2002), p.608.

Google Scholar

[8] Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Faler TA. J Prosthet Dent Vol. 81 (1999), p.207.

Google Scholar

[9] Sanita PV, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC, Machado AL. Mycoses Vol. 52(2) (2008), p.154.

Google Scholar

[10] Silva MM, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Neppelenbroek KH, Spolidorio DMP, Machado AL. Int J Prosthodont Vol 19 (2006), p.288.

Google Scholar

[11] Brondani MA, Samim F, Feng H. Gerodontology Vol. 29 (2010), p.6.

Google Scholar

[12] Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Spolidorio DM, Sgavioli EM, Spolidorio LC, Vergani CE et al. J Oral Rehabil Vol. 35 (2008), p.836.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01874.x

Google Scholar

[13] Pakhomov AG, Akyel Y, Pakhomova ON, Stuck BE, Murphy MR. Bioelectromagnetics Vol. 9 (1998), p.393.

Google Scholar

[14] Watanabe K, Kakita Y, Kashige N, Miake F, Tsukiji T. Lett Appl Microbiol Vol. 31 (2007), p.52.

Google Scholar

[15] Hong SM, Park JK, Lee YO. Water Res Vol. 38 (2004), p.1615.

Google Scholar

[16] Klotz S, Drutz D, and Zajic J. Infect Immun 1985; 97-101.

Google Scholar

[17] Rohrer MD, Bulard RA. J Am Dent Assoc Vol. 110 (1985) p.194.

Google Scholar