Increasing Commonalities by Designing Production-Oriented Modular Product Platforms

Abstract:

Companies producing in high-wage countries are increasingly challenged due to the necessary differentiation and cost pressure. The modular product platform approach is more and more used by these companies for structuring their product range in order to realise and deploy commonalities. This type of product architecture enables companies to produce nearly individual products without losing economies of scale across the product range. Economies of scale due to communalities result in decreased process costs, reduced development lead-time by uncoupling the development of modules and products as well as the augmentation of the technical product robustness. However, the design of modular product platforms itself causes new challenges regarding the product structuring, the process and organizational design. Recent approaches for the development of communalities through modular product platforms are focusing only the product itself. Since costs are mainly determined in the development phase but caused later in the production phase both product and production have to be taken into account. Furthermore, modular product platforms have a higher variety and diversity of elements since they represent the components, modules and functions of the entire product program. This paradigm shift from an integral product design to a modular product structure cannot be controlled with existing models and methods. Our paper confirms commonality has to be optimized by focusing both the product and production. Therefore we have designed a descriptive framework (commonality model) to display and optimize the commonality both in the product and the process. Furthermore, a product architecture development process that is superior to the individual product development processes was developed for the systematic design of commonalities. The approach presented in this paper focusses on the interactions between product and process parameters. In our approach these interactions will first be displayed based on the graph theory and then be optimized applying sensitivity analysis. By varying relevant parameters both on the product and process side constitutive features can be derived determining product and process standards in order to enhance the overall commonality level.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 907)
• Pages: 197-210
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.907.197
• Online since: April 2014
• Authors: Günther Schuh*, Stefan Rudolf, Jens Arnoscht, Bastian Lüdtke
• Keywords: Commonality, Modular Product Platform, Production-Oriented, Sensitivity Analysis

References

[1] Schuh G, Arnoscht J, Rudolf et al. (2010) Integrated Development of Modular Product Platforms. In: PICMET 2010 Proceedings, 18-22 July, Phuket, Thailand, p.1928–(1940).

[2] Ehrlenspiel K, Kiewert A, Lindemann U (2007) Kostengünstig entwickeln und konstruieren. Kostenmanagement bei der integrierten Produktentwicklung; mit 143 Tabellen, 6th edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-62591-0

[3] Schuh G, Arnoscht J, Bender D et al. (2011) Lean Innovation mit Ähnlichkeitsmodellen. In: AWK Aachener Werkzeugmaschinen-Kolloquium (ed) Wettbewerbsfaktor Produktionstechnik. Aachener Perspektiven. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, p.265–296.

DOI: 10.3139/104.100538

[4] Göpfert J (1998) Modulare Produktentwicklung: zur gemeinsamen Gestaltung von Technik und Organisation. Dt. Univ. -Verl. [u. a. ], Wiesbaden, Cottbus.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-08152-4_3

[5] Kohlhase N (1997).

[6] Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J et al. (2007) Konstruktionslehre - Grundlagen, 7. th edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

[7] Simpson TW, Maier JRA, Mistree F (2001) Product platform design: method and application. Research in Engineering Design 13(1): 2–22.

DOI: 10.1007/s001630100002

[8] Sekolec R (2005) Produktstrukturierung als Instrument des Variantenmanagements in der methodischen Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien (Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 16 Nr. 172).

[9] Dahmus JB, Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto K (2001) Modular Product Architecture. Design Studies 22: 409–424.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00004-7

[10] Cai YL, Nee AYC, Lu WF (2008) Platform differentitation plan for platform leverage across market niches. Cirp Annals - Manufacturing Technology 57: 141–144.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.088

[11] Nayak RU, Chen W, Simpson TW (2002) A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design. Engineering Optimization 34(1): 65–81. doi: 10. 1080/03052150210910.

DOI: 10.1080/03052150210910

[12] Fellini R, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros PY (2006) Quantitative platform selection in optimal design of product families, with application to automotive engine design. Journal of Engineering Design 17(5): 429–446. doi: 10. 1080/09544820500287797.

DOI: 10.1080/09544820500287797

[13] Ericsson A, Erixon G (1999) Controlling Design Variants (Modular Product Plattforms). Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, Michigan.

[14] Siddique Z (2000) Common Platform Development: Design for Product Variety.

[15] Martin MV (1999) Design for Variety: A Methodology for Developing Product platform architectures.

[16] Rapp T (1999) Produktstrukturierung: Komplexitätsmanagement durch modulare Produktstrukturen und - plattformen. Dt. Univ. -Verl. [u. a. ], Wiesbaden.

[17] ASME (ed) (1999) ASSESSING VALUE FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN AND SELECTION. Proceedings of the 25th Design Automation Conference - 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Las Vegas, Nevada.

DOI: 10.1115/detc99/dac-8613

[18] Simpson TW (2006) Methods for optimizing product platforms and product families. In: Simpson TW, Siddique Z, Jiao J (eds) Product Platform and Product Familiy Design - Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, New York, p.133–156.

DOI: 10.1007/0-387-29197-0_8

[19] Fixson S (2007) Modularity and Commonality Research: Past Developments and Future Opportunities. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 15(2): 85–111.

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x07078935

[20] Allen C (1990) Simultaneous Engineering. Integrating Manufacturing and Design. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn.

[21] Bullinger H, Warschat J (eds) (1996) Concurrent simultaneous engineering systems: the way to successful product development. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

[22] Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2003) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill higher education, 3. th edn. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston [u. a. ].

[23] Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P (1983) Design for assembly: a designer's handbook. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

[24] Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight WA (2010) Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Manufacturing Engineering and Materials Processing, 3rd edn., vol 74. CRC Press.

[25] Ehrlenspiel K (2003) Integrierte Produktentwicklung – Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit, vol 2. Hanser Verlag, München.

DOI: 10.3139/9783446436275.fm

[26] Kusiak A (2002) Integrated product and process design. A modularity perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 13(3): 223–231.

DOI: 10.1080/09544820110108926

[27] Sanchez R (2002) Using modularity to manage the interactions of technical and industrial design. Design Management Journal 2: 8–19.

[28] Gershenson. K., Prasad GJ (1997) Modularity in Product Design for Manufacturability. International Journal of Agile Manufacturing 1(1): 11.

[29] Jensen T, Hildre HP (2004) Product Platform Performance in Meeting with the Manufacturing. 8th International Design Conference DESIGN 2004 8: 309–316.

[30] Fellini R, Kokkolaras M, Michelena N et al. (2004).

[31] Simpson TW, Siddique Z, Jiao J (eds) (2006) Product Platform and Product Familiy Design - Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, New York.

[32] Suh ES, Weck OL, Chang D (2007) Flexible product platforms: framework and case study. Res Eng Design 18(2): 67–89. doi: 10. 1007/s00163-007-0032-z.

DOI: 10.1007/s00163-007-0032-z

[33] Dai Z, Scott MJ (2007) Product platform design through sensitivity analysis and cluster analysis. J Intell Manuf 18(1): 97–113. doi: 10. 1007/s10845-007-0011-2.

DOI: 10.1007/s10845-007-0011-2

[34] Luo XG, Tang JF, Kwong CK (2009).

[35] Baishu L, Xinggang L, Jiafu T (2009).

[36] Li ZK, Li XR, Zhu ZC (2011) Scalable Platform Robust Reconfiguration Method with Sensitivity Analysis and Fuzzy Clustering. AMM 52-54: 1026–1031. doi: 10. 4028/www. scientific. net/AMM. 52-54. 1026.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.52-54.1026

[37] Schuh G, Rudolf S, Arnoscht J et al. (2011) Lean Innovation with Commonality Models. ISPIM Proceedings 2011(4th ISPIM Innovation Symposium).

[38] CIRP (2004) Wörterbuch der Fertigungstechnik. Produktionssysteme, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin [u. a. ].

[39] Bergholz A (2005) Objektorientierte Fabrikplanung. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen.

[40] Kornwachs K (ed) (1984) Offenheit - Zeitlichkeit - Komplexität. Campus, Frankfurt.