Microstructuring of Surfaces for Bio-Medical Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

In recent years microfluidic devices became of great interest, as they offer a wide range of bio-analytical and fluid processing applications through the utilization of size effects. Especially a mass manufacturing of disposable polymeric microfluidic devices by hot embossing or injection molding is expected to have high economic potential. It is known, that channels and areas showing a localized change in wettability can considerably improve fluid processing tasks like mixing or droplet generation. Chemical approaches, like the polymerization of lauryl acrylate, were successfully shown to achieve hydrophobic coatings for micro channels but are not suitable for a mass manufacturing. Since microstructures are known to provide water repellent properties of surfaces, this paper focuses on the applicability of diamond grooving and Diamond Micro Chiseling (DMC) processes for the manufacture of microstructured areas in brass molds inserts, in order to achieve hydrophobic properties of their replica. Major design features of structures, like a height range of 6 to 16μm or aspect ratios in between 0.5 and 3.2 are derived from the natural example of the lotus leaf. Molding is carried out by using a two component silicone filler. The performance of the replicated hydrophobic surfaces is evaluated by droplet contact angle measurements. After presenting methodology and results, the paper will conclude on how to transfer the investigated microstructuring methods to the manufacture of mold inserts for the replication of polymeric microfluidic chips with localized hydrophobic areas and channels.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

213-224

Citation:

Online since:

April 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Evans CJ, Bryan JB (1999) Structured", "Textured" or "Engineered, Surfaces. CIRP Annals Manuf. Technol. 48/2: 541-556.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63233-8

Google Scholar

[2] Denkena B, Kästner J, Wang B (2010) Advanced microstructures and its production through cutting and grinding. CIRP Annals Manuf. Technol. 59: 67-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.066

Google Scholar

[3] Brinksmeier E, Riemer O, Twardy S (2010) Tribological behavior of micro structured surfaces for micro forming tools. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 50: 425-430.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.11.006

Google Scholar

[4] El-Samni OA, Chung HH, Yoon HS (2007) Drag reduction of turbulent flow over thin rectangular riblets. Int. J. of En. Sci. 45: 436-454.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2007.03.002

Google Scholar

[5] Gombert A, Glaubitt W, Rose K, Dreibholz J, Zanke C, Bläsi B, Heinzel A, Horbelt W, Sporn D, Döll W, Wittwer V (1998) Glazing with very high solar transmittance. Solar Energy 62: 177-188.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(98)00008-5

Google Scholar

[6] Scholz SG, Griffiths CA, Dimov SS, Brousseau EB, Lalev G, Petkov P (2011) Manufacturing routes for replicating micro and nano surface structures with bio-mimetic applications. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 4: 347-356.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.05.004

Google Scholar

[7] Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202: 1-8.

DOI: 10.1007/s004250050096

Google Scholar

[8] Lii J, Hsu WJ, Lee SP, Sia SK (2006) Microfluidics. Kirk-Othmer Encycl. Chem. Technol. 23: 959-980.

Google Scholar

[9] Bouaidat S, Hansen O, Bruus H, Berendsen C, Bau-Madsen NK, Thomsen P, Wolff A, Jonsmanna J (2005) Surface-directed capillary system; theory, experiments and applications. Lab chip 5: 827-836.

DOI: 10.1039/b502207j

Google Scholar

[10] Kobayashi T, Shimizu K, Kaizumac Y, Konishi S (2011) Novel combination of hydrophilic/hydrophobic surface for large wettability difference and its application to liquid manipulation. Lab chip 11: 639-644.

DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00394h

Google Scholar

[11] Bauer WAC, Fischlechner M, Abell C, Huck WTS (2010) Hydrophilic PDMS microchannels for high-throughput formation of oil-in-water microdroplets and water-in-oil-in-water double emulsions. Lab chip 10: 1814-1819.

DOI: 10.1039/c004046k

Google Scholar

[12] Derzsi L, Jankowski P, Lisowski W, Garstecki P (2011) Hydrophilic polycarbonate for generation of oil in water emulsions in microfluidic devices. Lab chip 11: 1151-1156.

DOI: 10.1039/c0lc00438c

Google Scholar

[13] Öztürk E, Turan E, Caykara T (2010) Fabrication of ultrahydrophobic poly(lauryl acrylate) brushes on silicon wafer via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257: 1015-1020.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.010

Google Scholar

[14] Fiorini GS, Chiu DT (2005) Disposable microfluidic devices: fabrication, function, and application. BioTechniques 38/3: 429-446.

DOI: 10.2144/05383rv02

Google Scholar

[15] Becker H (2009) It's the economy. Lab Chip 9: 2759-2762.

Google Scholar

[16] Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Atherton S, Newton MI (2010) An introduction to Superhydrophobicity. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 161: 124-138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.11.001

Google Scholar

[17] Wenzel RN (1936) Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28: 988-994.

DOI: 10.1021/ie50320a024

Google Scholar

[18] Cassie ABD, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40: 546-551.

DOI: 10.1039/tf9444000546

Google Scholar

[19] Patankar NA (2004) Transition between Superhydrophobic States on Rough Surfaces. Langmuir 20: 7097-7102.

DOI: 10.1021/la049329e

Google Scholar

[20] Johnson RE Jr, Dettre RH (1963) Contact Angle, Wettability, and Adhesion. Adv. Chem. Ser. 43: 112-135.

Google Scholar

[21] Yoshimitsu Z, Nakajima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K (2002) Effects of Surface Structure on the Hydrophobicity and Sliding Behavior of Water Droplets. Langmuir 18: 5718-5822.

DOI: 10.1021/la020088p

Google Scholar

[22] Bahadur V, Garimella SV (2009) Preventing the Cassie-Wenzel Transition Using Surfaces with Noncommunicating Roughness Elements. Langmuir 25: 4815-4820.

DOI: 10.1021/la803691m

Google Scholar

[23] Wang J, Chen H, Sui T, Li A, Chen D (2009) Investigation on hydrophobicity of lotus leaf: Experiment and theory. Plant Sci. 176: 687-695.

DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.013

Google Scholar

[24] Balani K, Batista RG, Lahiri D, Agarwal A (2009) The hydrophobicity of a lotus leaf: a nanomechanical and computational approach. Nanotechnol. 20.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/30/305707

Google Scholar

[25] De Chiffre L, Kunzmann H, Peggs GN, Lucca DA (2003) Surfaces in Precision Engineering, Microengineering and Nanotechnology. CIRP Annals Manuf. Technol. 52/2: 561-577.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60204-2

Google Scholar

[26] Brinksmeier E, Autschbach L (2003) Development of Ultraprecise Milling Techniques for the Manufacture of Optical Quality Molds with Continuous and Microstructured Surfaces. Proc. euspen Int. Conf. 4.

Google Scholar

[27] Brinksmeier E, Gläbe R, Schönemann L (2012) Review on diamond-machining processes for the generation of functional surface structures. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 5: 1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2011.10.003

Google Scholar

[28] Brinksmeier E, Autschbach L (2003) Diamond Contour Boring and Raster-Milling of Molds for an Ultraprecision Open Ring Light System. Proc. euspen Int. Conf. 4: 189-192.

Google Scholar

[29] Brinksmeier E, Gläbe R, Flucke C (2008) Manufacturing of molds for replication of micro cube corner retroreflectors. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 2: 33–38.

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-008-0082-8

Google Scholar

[30] Staeves J (1998) Beurteilung der Topographie von Blechen im Hinblick auf die Reibung bei der Umformung. Dissertation, Technische Univerität Darmstadt.

Google Scholar