An Experimental Evaluation of Static Strength and Fatigue Life on Composite Patch Repaired AA2024-T4 Plate

Article Preview

Abstract:

AA2024-T4 Al substrate with and without bonded E-glass/Epoxy patches were undergone for the experimental study of tensile strength and fatigue behavior. The Al substrates were machined to edge cracked specimens. The strength of the substrate was decreased due to the presence of crack when compared with un-cracked Al substrate. The patches were made in liquid epoxy resin instead of film adhesives and it was discovered that the both static strength and fatigue life were significantly increased for bonded composite patches. Different ply patches were applied on the cracked Al substrates and it was noted that the 9ply patch demonstrated its effectiveness in preventing static failure and increasing fatigue life of the cracked substrates

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 984-985)

Pages:

233-237

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A.A. Baker, Bonded Composite Repair of Metallic Aircraft Components-Overview of Australian Activities, AGARD – Compos Repair of Military Aircraft Struct (1995) (1) 1-14.

Google Scholar

[2] T. E. Tay, F. S. Chau, C. J. Er., Bonded boron-epoxy composite repair and reinforcement of cracked aluminium structures. Compos Struct 34 (1996) 339-347.

DOI: 10.1016/0263-8223(95)00159-x

Google Scholar

[3] Alan Baker, Bonded composite repair of fatigue-cracked primary aircraft structure, Compos Struct 47 (1999) 431-443.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(00)00011-8

Google Scholar

[4] Ki-Hyun Chung, Won-Ho Yang, A study on the fatigue crack growth behavior of thick aluminum panels repaired with a composite patch, Compos Struct 60 (2003) 1–7.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00338-0

Google Scholar

[5] Jones R, Chiu WK, Sawyer JPG, Composite repairs to cracks in thick metallic components. Compos Struct (1999) 44(1): 17–29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(98)00108-1

Google Scholar

[6] P Poole, A Young, A S Ball, Adhesively Bonded Composite Patch Repair of Cracked Aluminium Alloy Structures, AGARD - Compos Repair of Mil Aircraft Struct. (1995) (3) 1-12.

Google Scholar

[7] Wei-Chung Wang, Jiong-Shiun Hsu, Investigation of the size efect of composite patching repaired on edge-cracked plates, Compos Struct. 49 (2000) 415-423.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(00)00076-3

Google Scholar

[8] Cong N. Duong, Chun Hui Wang, Composite repair theory and design, First ed, UK, (2007).

Google Scholar

[9] Liyong Tong Adrian, P. Mouritz, Michael K. Bannister, 3D Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites, First ed, UK, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008043938-9/50012-0

Google Scholar

[10] H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, G. Sadeghi , H.R. Daghyani, Experimental fatigue crack growth and crack-front shape analysis of asymmetric repaired aluminium panels with glass/epoxy composite patches, Compos Struct. 71 (2005) 401-406.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.032

Google Scholar

[11] H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, Effects of composite patches on fatigue crack propagation of single-side repaired aluminum panels. Compos Struct. 76 (2006) 243-251.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.028

Google Scholar

[12] R. Jones, S. Barter, L. Molent, S. Pitt, Crack patching: an experimental evaluation of fatigue crack growt, Compos Struct. 67 (2005) 229–238.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.020

Google Scholar

[13] Q.Y. Wang, R.M. Pidaparti, Static characteristics and fatigue behavior of composite-repaired aluminum plates, Compos Struct. 56 (2002) 151-155.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(01)00176-3

Google Scholar

[14] Klug JC, Maley S, Sun CT, Characterization of fatigue behavior of bonded composite repairs. J Aircraft. (1999) 36(6) 1016–22.

DOI: 10.2514/2.2543

Google Scholar

[15] Emin Ergun, Süleyman Tasgetiren, Muzaffer Tocu, Fatigue and fracture analysis of aluminum plate with composite patches under the hygrothermal effect, Compos Struct, 92 (2010) 2622–2631.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.03.015

Google Scholar