Research on Market Model for China Forest Carbon-Sink in Coal Mines

Article Preview

Abstract:

In post-Kyoto Protocol times, forest carbon-sink has become one of the key path choices to realize clean development for China. Currently, China’s carbon market system has not come into being. So it is necessary to take government-leading model to establish three market systems. They are property relations of coal forest, binding planning for GDP carbon emission intensity and credit trading system of forest carbon-sink. Based on market systems, certified emission reductions (CERs) and voluntary emission reductions (VERs) in mining industry can be developed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)

Pages:

1387-1390

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ministry of Land and Resources, PRC. China's Report of Mineral Resources (2013) [M]. Beijing, Geological Publishing House, 2013(10).

Google Scholar

[2] The Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development of the People's Republic of China. [M]. Beijing, People's Publishing House, (2011).

Google Scholar

[3] Kyoto Protocol [M]. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (1997).

Google Scholar

[4] Pei Q,Jiang M,Zhang M H. A Study of Legal Attributes of Carbon Emission Rights in Carbon Trading [J]. Ecological Economy,2009(1).

Google Scholar

[5] Panda Standard. [M]. Beijing, Beijing Environmental Exchange, (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Shuxia Li, Zhiguo Zhou. Operating Mechanism of Forest Carbon Sequestration Market. [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University(Social Sciences), 2010(2):88-93.

Google Scholar

[7] Hardin, G. Tragedy of the Commons [J]. Science, 1968, 162 (3859):1243–1248.

Google Scholar

[8] Yan Xiao, Xiaoxue Li. Path Selection for Forest Carbon Market Cultivation in China. [J]. World Forestry Research, 2012(1):55-59.

Google Scholar