The Selection of Online Power Flow Calculation’s Known Quantities

Abstract:

The difference between schedule power flow and online power flow is that the former has no corresponding physical power flow, while the latter is the reappearance of existing physical power flow. Owing to the different premise, the selection of power flow calculation’s known quantities can be different. A schedule power flow schedules physical power flow for power system, so the selection of known quantities has strict requirements, such as active power and reactive power regulation capability. Since the physical power flow exists, the selection of online power flow calculation’s known quantities can be more flexible. For example, we can choose load bus as slack bus or replace PQ bus with PV bus. The example demonstrated that we could locate the stealing electricity buses by choosing load bus as slack bus. Considering that voltage amplitude measurement accuracy is higher than reactive power measurement accuracy, we can replace PQ bus with PV bus and make the power flow calculation results more consistent with the physical power flow. Finally, the examples show that online power flow calculation’s known quantities can be selected flexibly according to the actual situation rather than strictly following the classical power flow calculation requirements.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 986-987)
• Pages: 1396-1400
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.986-987.1396
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Ling Wang*, Hai Bao, Yu Long Chen
• Keywords: Accuracy, Known Quantity, Online Power Flow Calculation, Reactive Power Flow

References

[1] Xi'an Jiaotong University, Tsinghua University, Zhejiang University, Hunan University, Power system calculation [M]. Water Conservancy and Electric Power Press, August (1978).

[2] Budeunu, C. Reactive and fictions power [J]. Publication NZ of the Rumanian National Institute. Bucarest, (1927).

[3] Shepherd, W., and ZAKIKHANI, P. Suggested definition of reactive power for non-sinusoidal system [J]. Proc. IEE., 1972, 119: 1361-1362.

[4] Emanuel, A.E. Suggested definition of reactive power in non-sinusoidal systems and reactive power definitions and power factor improvement in nonlinear system [J]. Peoc. IEE, 1974, 121(7): 705-706.

DOI: 10.1049/piee.1974.0161

[5] Czarnecki, L.S. Considerations on the reactive power in non-sinusoidal situations [J]. IEEE Trans., 1985, 1M-34: 399-404.

[6] Fryze, S. Active, reactive and apparent power in circuit with non-sinusoidal waveform of current and voltage [J]. Przeglad Electrotechniczny, 1931, (7): 1993-203, and, (8): 225-234.

[7] Page C H. Reactive power in non-sinusoidal situation [J]. IEEE Transactions and Measurement，1980，29 (4): 420-423.

[8] Akagi H，Kanazawa Y，Nabae A . Generalized theory of the instantaneous reactive power in three-Phase circuits[C]. International Conference on Power Electronics，Tokyo，(1983).

[9] Mei Xue, Wu Weilin. Reactive power measurement [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument，2003，24(4)：43-45+49.

[10] Etienne Moulin．Measuring reactive power in energy meters[J]．Metering international，2002，3(1)：51-54.

[11] Liu Yuhuai, Ye Yi, Liu Jingao. The error of three phase reactive power measurement methods[J]. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2003，40(453)：28-31.

[12] Qian Hao, Zhao Rongxiang. Inter-harmonics analysis based on interpolation FFT algorithm[J] . Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005， 25(21)：90-94.

[13] Wang Bolin, Liu Hua. Reactive power measurement with quasi-synchronous Hilbert arithmetic [J] . Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation, 2003，40(12)：13-15.

[14] Liu Qiankun, Li Hongwei. A novel method of reactive power measurement based on interpolation FFT algorithm refactoring Hilbert transformation [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2009，37(15)：19-22.

[15] Bao Hai, Huang Xin, Wang Ling, Liu Gang. A new method for online steady-state power flow calculation in electric power system. 4th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Technology, ICMST 2013: 1090-1093.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.816-817.1090