Optimization of Groundwater Sampling after Destruction by Multiple Rocket Launcher Systems

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper explores the problem of optimizing groundwater sampling in areas affected by multiple rocket launcher systems (MRLS). Taking into account modern challenges to the safety of the population and the environment in the conditions of hostilities, an express method of preliminary zoning of groundwater pollution based on the measurement of electrical conductivity has been proposed. The method is based on modeling the spread of contaminants in combination with cluster analysis of these measurements. The results of the study can be used for operational monitoring of territories affected by hostilities and in management decision-making systems in the field of civil protection.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

163-171

Citation:

Online since:

November 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Athamena, A. Gaagai, H.A. Aouissi, J. Burlakovs, S. Bencedira, I. Zekker, & A.E. Krauklis, Chemometrics of the environment: hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in Lioua plain (North Africa) using time series and multivariate statistical analysis. Sustainability. 15(1) (2022) 20.

DOI: 10.3390/su15010020

Google Scholar

[2] J. Liu, C. Yang, S. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, W. Kang, ... & X. Yuan, Hydrochemical Appraisal and Driving Forces of Groundwater Quality and Potential Health Risks of Nitrate in Typical Agricultural Area of Southwestern China. Water. 15(23) (2023) 4095.

DOI: 10.3390/w15234095

Google Scholar

[3] V. Loboichenko, N. Nikitina, N. Leonova, O. Konovalova, A. Bondarenko, O. Zemlianskyi, & N. Rashkevich, Study of the features of determination of heavy metals in bottom sediments. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1348 (2024) 1 012014. IOP Publishing.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1348/1/012014

Google Scholar

[4] V. Loboichenko, N. Leonova, N. Nikitina, Ye. Savchenko, N. Rashkevich, O. Shevchenko, & A. Khmyrova, Ensuring environmental safety during express determination of individual components of plant raw materials in aqueous solutions. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1491 (2025) 012027

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1491/1/012027

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Cheng, Y. Zheng, R. Mortlock, & A. Van Geen, Rapid multi-element analysis of groundwater by high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry. 379 (2004) 512–518.

DOI: 10.1007/s00216-004-2618-x

Google Scholar

[6] T. Giblin, & W.T. Frankenberger, Rapid detection of perchlorate in groundwater using capillary electrophoresis. Chromatographia. 52 (2000) 505–508.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02535727

Google Scholar

[7] G. MacDonald, J. Levison, & B. Parker, On methods for in‐well nitrate monitoring using optical sensors. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 37(4) (2017) 60–70.

DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12248

Google Scholar

[8] O. Koshliakov, & S. Kosharna, Feasible Ways of Improving the Groundwater Monitoring System'Organization in Ukraine. In 17th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. 2023 (2023) 1 1–5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.

DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.2023520078

Google Scholar

[9] A. Myroshnychenko, V. Loboichenko, M. Divizinyuk, A. Levterov, N. Rashkevich, O. Shevchenko, & R. Shevchenko, Application of Up-to-Date Technologies for Monitoring the State of Surface Water in Populated Areas Affected by Hostilities. Bulletin of the georgian national academy of sciences. 16 3 (2022) 50–59.

Google Scholar

[10] J.K. Thakur, Optimizing groundwater monitoring networks using integrated statistical and geostatistical approaches. Hydrology. 2(3) (2015) 148–175.

DOI: 10.3390/hydrology2030148

Google Scholar

[11] R.K. Rai, P. Shyamsundar, M. Nepal, & L.D. Bhatta, Financing watershed services in the foothills of the Himalayas. Water. 10(7) (2018) 965.

DOI: 10.3390/w10070965

Google Scholar

[12] G.S. Herrera, & G.F. Pinder, Space‐time optimization of groundwater quality sampling networks. Water Resources Research. 41(12) (2005).

DOI: 10.1029/2004wr003626

Google Scholar

[13] S. Zhang, H. Liu, J. Qiang, H. Gao, D. Galar, & J. Lin, Optimization of Well Position and Sampling Frequency for Groundwater Monitoring and Inverse Identification of Contamination Source Conditions Using Bayes' Theorem. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences. 119(2) (2019) 373–394.

DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2019.03825

Google Scholar

[14] T.R.N. Amanah, T.T. Putranto, & M. Helmi, Application of cluster analysis and principal component analysis for assessment of groundwater quality – A study in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. 248 1 (2019) 012063. IOP Publishing.

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012063

Google Scholar

[15] A.E. Marín Celestino, D.A. Martínez Cruz, E.M. Otazo Sánchez, F. Gavi Reyes, & D. Vásquez Soto, Groundwater quality assessment: An improved approach to K-means clustering, principal component analysis and spatial analysis: A case study. Water. 10(4) (2018) 437.

DOI: 10.3390/w10040437

Google Scholar

[16] M. El-Rawy, H. Fathi, F. Abdalla, F. Alshehri, & H. Eldeeb, An integrated principal component and hierarchical cluster analysis approach for groundwater quality assessment in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. Water. 15(8) (2023) 1466.

DOI: 10.3390/w15081466

Google Scholar