Modelling Vehicular Impact for Threat-Dependent Progressive Collapse Assessments

Article Preview

Abstract:

Structural robustness is vital to prevent disproportionate damage in a progressive collapse of a structure. Current assessment methods in building structures, such as the notional removal of structural members, are unable to capture cascading effects from debris impact loading and chained hazard scenarios. Vehicular impact with penetration into the building volume is an example of a plausible chained hazard scenario. In this study, the adequacy of notional damage methods was assessed for vehicular impact loading on building structures and a comprehensive framework was developed to address key limitations in conventional design methods against vehicular impact. The conventional approaches have relied on prescriptive forces and simplified models and have over-looked important phenomena, such as variable vehicle stiffness and energy dissipation mechanisms. The use of the vehicular impact framework has been exemplified using a model for progressive collapse to assess the consequences of successive time-delayed column loss on the structural response from the penetration of a lorry. The time-delay of successive column loss from vehicular impact was determined by considering the kinetic energy and energy dissipation mechanisms. Higher initial velocities lead to higher post-impact velocities after the initial impact on a column and to a reduction in time between successive failures, thus heightening the likelihood of cascading failures in structural columns and progressive collapse. Progressive collapse simulations revealed that a building structure may have sufficient robustness to prevent progressive collapse when subjected to the loss of single columns. However, successive column losses triggered an extensive progressive collapse.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

11-24

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Funder:

The publication of this article was funded by the ETH Zurich 10.13039/501100003006

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] European Committee for Standardization, EN 1991-1-7:2006. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures, General actions - Accidental actions, (2016).

Google Scholar

[2] American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE/SEI 76-23. Standard for Mitigation of Disproportionate Collapse Potential in Buildings and Other Structures, (2023).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784415931

Google Scholar

[3] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Air Force Civil Engineer Center, UFC 4-023-03. Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, (2009). https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/dod/unified-facilities-criteria-ufc/ufc-4-023-03 (accessed October 7, 2024).

DOI: 10.18057/ijasc.2018.14.4.1

Google Scholar

[4] University of Maryland, Global Terrorism Database, (2022). http://apps.start.umd.edu/gtd/ (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[5] Storefront Safety Council, The most updated storefront crash database, (2023). https://www.storefrontsafety.org (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[6] K. Wilson, Streetsblog USA, Vehicle-Into-Building Crashes 40% Higher Than Previously Thought, (2022). https://usa.streetsblog.org/2022/06/21/vehicle-into-building-crashes-40-higher-than-previously-thought (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Kronman, The Seattle Times, More drivers have been crashing into Seattle buildings, (2023). https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/how-often-do-cars-crash-into-buildings-in-seattle-way-more-than-you-think/ (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Ateya, The Michigan Daily, Cars should not crash into buildings, (2023). http://www.michigandaily.com/opinion/cars-should-not-crash-into-buildings/ (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[9] Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority, Investigation of tram derailment at the intersection between Nygata and Storgata in Oslo, (2024). https://nsia.no/Rail/Rail/Investigations/24-795 (accessed January 27, 2025).

Google Scholar

[10] Redaktionsnetzwerk Deutschland, LKW-Unfall in Thüringen/Altkirchen: Gebäude stürzt ein, Fahrer stirbt, (2020). https://www.rnd.de/panorama/lkw-unfall-in-thuringenaltkirchen-gebaude-sturzt-ein-fahrer-stirbt-46Z75TD4YXZUZXJMJPVA6OLGMQ.html (accessed January 14, 2025).

Google Scholar

[11] JCSS, Probabilistic Model Code: Part II - Load Models, Impact Load, Joint Committee on Structural Safety, 2001.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Taushanov, E. Spasova, Determination of Vehicle Impact Loads according to different Design codes, Annu. Univ. Archit. Civ. Eng. Geod. Sofia 57 (2024) 739.

Google Scholar

[13] K.L. Campbell, Energy Basis for Collision Severity, in: SAE International, 1974.

DOI: 10.4271/740565

Google Scholar

[14] C. Bare, D. Peterson, M. Marine, K. Welsh, Energy Dissipation in High Speed Frontal Collisions, in: SAE International, 2013.

DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0770

Google Scholar

[15] N. Poirette, F.P. Bayan, J. Suway, A. Cornetto, A. Cipriani, R. Wahba, N. Poirette, F.P. Bayan, J. Suway, A. Cornetto, A. Cipriani, R. Wahba, Stiffness Coefficients of Heavy Commercial Vehicles, in: SAE International, 2013.

DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-0796

Google Scholar

[16] H. Al-Thairy, Y.C. Wang, An assessment of the current Eurocode 1 design methods for building structure steel columns under vehicle impact, J. Constr. Steel Res. 88 (2013) 164–171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.05.013

Google Scholar

[17] K.M.A. Sohel, K. Al-Jabri, A.H.S. Al Abri, Behavior and design of reinforced concrete building columns subjected to low-velocity car impact, Structures 26 (2020) 601–616.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.054

Google Scholar

[18] European Committee for Standardization, EN 14080:2013. Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber - Requirements, (2016).

DOI: 10.3403/30236370

Google Scholar

[19] A. Cao, A. Frangi, Dynamic strength increase of glued laminated timber beams subjected to impact loading, in: 2023.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Schilling, P. Palma, R. Steiger, A. Frangi, Probabilistic description of the mechanical properties of glued laminated timber made from softwood, in: INTER Proc. Meet. Fifty-Four 2021, Timber Scientific Publishing, 2021: p.333–349.

Google Scholar

[21] JCSS, Probabilistic Model Code: Part III - Resistance Models, Timber, Joint Committee on Structural Safety, 2006.

Google Scholar

[22] A. Cao, P. Palma, A. Frangi, Dynamic amplification factors in instantaneously loaded structures, Eng. Struct. (2025).

Google Scholar

[23] A. Cao, Modelling progressive collapse of timber buildings and its applications, Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich, 2024.

Google Scholar

[24] F. McKenna, M.H. Scott, G.L. Fenves, Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition, J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (2010) 95–107.

DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002

Google Scholar

[25] M. Zhu, F. McKenna, M.H. Scott, OpenSeesPy: Python library for the OpenSees finite element framework, SoftwareX 7 (2018) 6–11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2017.10.009

Google Scholar

[26] A. Cao, L. Esser, A. Frangi, Modelling progressive collapse of timber buildings, Structures 62 (2024) 106279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106279

Google Scholar

[27] European Committee for Standardization, EN 1990:2002. Eurocode: Basis of structural design, (2016).

Google Scholar

[28] A. Cao, P. Palma, A. Frangi, Multi-scale hysteretic model of laterally loaded timber connections with dowel-type fasteners, in: 2023: p.915–926.

Google Scholar

[29] K.A. Malo, J. Siem, P. Ellingsbø, Quantifying ductility in timber structures, Eng. Struct. 33 (2011) 2998–3006.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.03.002

Google Scholar

[30] M. Geiser, L. Furrer, L. Kramer, S. Blumer, M. Follesa, Investigations of connection detailing and steel properties for high ductility doweled timber connections, Constr. Build. Mater. 324 (2022) 126670.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126670

Google Scholar