Experimental Study of the Behaviour of Sla Sandwich Panels with Different Micro Lattice Structures under Repeated Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sandwich panels are widely used in engineering applications due to their advantageous combination of lightweight and high strength. However, their long-term mechanical performance under repeated loading highly depends on the internal lattice structure. This study experimentally investigates the behavior of SLA-manufactured sandwich panels with different lattice geometries under cyclic loading conditions. Various lattice configurations were designed and subjected to repeated compressive loads while monitoring stress relaxation and mechanical deformation over time. The results demonstrate that lattice geometry significantly affects load-bearing capacity and energy dissipation. Notably, structures incorporating vertical support members exhibited higher energy absorption, whereas those without vertical supports, such as M4 and M5, showed improved resistance to stress relaxation over multiple cycles. Furthermore, while all specimens experienced load reductions after 25 cycles, the magnitude of these reductions varied based on the lattice configuration, with M3 exhibiting the highest load decay. These findings contribute to optimizing lattice-based sandwich structures for enhanced durability and mechanical efficiency in engineering applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

51-57

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Frazier WE, Manzo J, Cormier D and Wohlers J (2020) Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties. Progress in Materials Science 112: 100688.

Google Scholar

[2] Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J and Hui D (2017) 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering 110: 442–458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034

Google Scholar

[3] Schultz, J., Griese, D., Ju, J., Shankar, P., Summers, J. D., & Thompson, L. (2015).Design of multifunctional hierarchical lattice structures for additive manufacturing. *Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(11), 111413.

Google Scholar

[4] Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017). 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering, 110, 442-458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034

Google Scholar

[5] Gibson, L.J., & Ashby, M.F. (1997).Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties*. Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

[6] Yan, C., Hao, L., Hussein, A., & Raymont, D. (2012).Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. *International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 62, 32-38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.06.002

Google Scholar

[7] Menard KP and Menard NR (2017) Stress relaxation behavior of polymers: A review. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 55(18): 1329–1349.

Google Scholar

[8] Wu,S., & Sancaktar, E. (2022). Modeling Three-Dimensional-Printed Polymer Lattice Metamaterial Recovery after Cyclic Large Deformation. ASME Open Journal of Engineering, 1.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4055466

Google Scholar

[9] Lin Z, Qu S and Xiao R (2024) A Review on the Mullins Effect in Tough Elastomers and Gels. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 37(2): 181–214.

DOI: 10.1007/s10338-023-00460-6

Google Scholar