Dynamic Response of BFRP Bars Subjected to Impact Loading at High Strain Rates

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) bars have gained widespread recognition as a viable alternative to steel reinforcement in concrete structures over the past decades due to their advantages in corrosion resistance, durability, and lightweight properties. However, existing research and current design codes do not adequately address the dynamic compressive response of FRP bars under high-impact loading conditions. This gap in knowledge presents a significant challenge in accurately predicting the response of FRP-reinforced structures under extreme loading events. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the response of FRP bars under dynamic loading conditions across a range of strain rates to improve design codes and ensure the reliability and safety of structures subjected to such conditions. This study presents an experimental program conducted on basalt FRP (BFRP) bars subjected to dynamic testing using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus. The 12-mm BFRP bars are subjected to impact loading at high strain rates ranging from 345 to 1300 s-1. These varying strain rates are achieved by adjusting the pressure of the impact bar. A high-speed camera is employed to capture the failure mechanisms and provide visualization of the deformations during loading. The study focuses on evaluating the stress-strain relationship and failure modes of the tested BFRP bars under various loading rates. The results revealed that at higher strain rates of ∼1300 s-1, BFRP bars lost 40% of its compressive strength when compared to its quasi-static strength (tested at 3.5 x 10-4 s-1). At lower strain rates (∼345 s-1), 20% of the quasi-static strength is lost. At intermediate strain rates (∼590-740 s-1), one sample showed a strength reduction of 26%, while another sample showed a strength gain of 10%. This proves that BFRP bars are highly strain-rate dependent. Additionally, the results show relatively significant variation in the behavior of the samples at similar strain rates, indicating microstructural differences between them.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-91

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N. Gowripalan, H.M. Mohamed, Chloride-ion induced corrosion of galvanized and ordinary steel reinforcement in high-performance concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 28 (1998) 1119-1131.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(98)00090-8

Google Scholar

[2] G. Feng, D. Zhu, S. Guo, M.Z. Rahman, Z. Jin, C. Shi, A review on mechanical properties and deterioration mechanisms of FRP bars under severe environmental and loading conditions, Cem. Concr. Compos. 134 (2022) 104758.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104758

Google Scholar

[3] ACI Committee 440, Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars, ACI 440.1R-15, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2015.

DOI: 10.14359/51663177

Google Scholar

[4] S. Han, C. Fan, A. Zhou, J. Ou, Simplified implementation of equivalent and ductile performance for steel-FRP composite bars reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete beams: Equal-stiffness design method, Eng. Struct. 266 (2022) 114590.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114590

Google Scholar

[5] ACI Committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318-19, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0431(1996)2:3(120.3)

Google Scholar

[6] ACI Committee 440, Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars, ACI 440.1R-15, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2015.

DOI: 10.14359/51663177

Google Scholar

[7] H. Alkhraisha, H. Mhanna, N. Tello, F. Abed, Serviceability and flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars exposed to harsh conditions, Polymers 12 (2020) 2110.

DOI: 10.3390/polym12092110

Google Scholar

[8] A. El Refai, F. Abed, A. Altalmas, Bond durability of basalt fiber–reinforced polymer bars embedded in concrete under direct pullout conditions, J. Compos. Constr. 19 (2015) 04014078.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000544

Google Scholar

[9] F. Elgabbas, E.A. Ahmed, B. Benmokrane, Physical and mechanical characteristics of new basalt-FRP bars for reinforcing concrete structures, Constr. Build. Mater. 95 (2015) 623-635.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.036

Google Scholar

[10] N. Elmesalami, F. Abed, A.E. Refai, Concrete columns reinforced with GFRP and BFRP bars under concentric and eccentric loads: Experimental testing and analytical investigation, J. Compos. Constr. 25 (2021) 04021003.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001115

Google Scholar

[11] F. Abed, Z. Elnassar, W. Abuzaid, Y. Alhoubi, Compressive response of GFRP and BFRP bars at different temperatures and quasi-static rates, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 31 (2023) 1-8.

DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2280856

Google Scholar

[12] F. Abed, Z. Mehaini, C. Oucif, A. Abdul–Latif, R. Baleh, Quasi-static and dynamic response of GFRP and BFRP bars under compression, Compos. Part C Open Access 2 (2020) 100034.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100034

Google Scholar