Experimental Study on Structural Behavior of GFRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Column under Near-Field Blast Load

Article Preview

Abstract:

The newly developed hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular column (DSTC) integrates both high corrosion resistance and load-bearing capacity, enabling its potential for applications in high-temperature, high-humidity, and highly corrosive island environments, compared to traditional reinforced concrete or steel columns. However, from the perspective of multi-hazard mitigation, existing research on DSTC columns has predominantly focused on their static and seismic performance, while studies on the behavior of DSTCs under near-field blast load are scarce. In this paper, three glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns (GFRP-DSTCs) were fabricated and tested under near-field explosion with same TNT equivalent but different scaled distances (ranging from 0.368 m/kg1/3 to 0.240 m/kg1/3). The GFRP tube was made through filament-wound technique and vinyl ester resins, and the glass fibers were oriented at ±80º with respect to the longitudinal axis of the column. The GFRP-DSTCs were installed in a field with bottom end fixed and top end simply supported. The results show that under near-field blast load, the damage to GFRP-DSTCs were concentrated in the region close the charge, where material failure and localized deformation were observed. When the scaled distance was 0.368 m/kg1/3, the specimens showed only localized inward bending, with the surface of the GFRP tube on the blast-facing surface subjected to the impact of detonation products, resulting in a roughened surface. Additionally, the localized surface turned black due to the explosion fireball and numerous circumferential cracks developed on the other area. While the scaled distance was 0.301 m/kg1/3, the specimen exhibited significant localized rupture of the GFRP tube at the blast-facing surface, accompanied by lamination along the thickness direction of the tube, and the concrete at the blast-facing surface was extensively crushed. As the scaled distance further decreased to 0.240 m/kg1/3, the concrete crushing zone extended from the blast-facing surface to the entire side surface with the inner steel tube exposed and bent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

93-100

Citation:

Online since:

December 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Teng, J. G., Yu, T., Wong, Y. L., & Dong, S. L. (2007). Hybrid FRP–concrete–steel tubular columns: Concept and behavior. Construction and Building Materials, 21(4), 846-854.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.017

Google Scholar

[2] Qian, J. R., & Liu, M. X. (2006). Experiment of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular long columns under axial compressive load. Concrete(09), 31-34. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Liu, M. X., & Qian, J. R. (2007). Moment-curvature relationships of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tublar members. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)(12), 2105-2110. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Qian, J. R., & Liu, M. X. (2008). Experimental investigation of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular stubs under axial compressive loading. Journal of Building Structures(02), 104-113. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Qian, J. R., & Liu, M. X. (2008). Test of seismic behavior of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns. China Civil Engineering Journa(03), 29-36. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Wong, Y. L., Yu, T., Teng, J. G., & Dong, S. L. (2008). Behavior of FRP-confined concrete in annular section columns. Composites Part B: Engineering, 39(3), 451-466.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.04.001

Google Scholar

[7] Yu, T., Teng, J. G., & Wong, Y. L. (2010). Stress-strain behavior of concrete in hybrid frp-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(4), 379-389.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000121

Google Scholar

[8] Yu, T., & Teng, J. G. (2013). Behavior of Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns with a Square Outer Tube and a Circular Inner Tube Subjected to Axial Compression. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(2), 271-279.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000331

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang, B., Teng, J. G., & Yu, T. (2015). Experimental behavior of hybrid FRP–concrete–steel double-skin tubular columns under combined axial compression and cyclic lateral loading. Engineering Structures, 99, 214-231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.002

Google Scholar

[10] Chandramouli, P., Jayaseelan, R., & Pandulu, G. (2022). Axial compression behaviour of hybrid composite FRP–concrete–steel double-skin tubular columns with various fibre orientations. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 17, e01326.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01326

Google Scholar

[11] Jiang, T., Lin, G., & Xie, P. (2023). Behavior of large-scale hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns subjected to eccentric compression. Engineering Structures, 275, 115258.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115258

Google Scholar

[12] Xie, P., Jiang, T., Lin, G., Li, L. J., & Guo, Y. C. (2023). Hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns of varying slenderness ratios under eccentric compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 201, 107741.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107741

Google Scholar

[13] Bhat, P., & Jamatia, R. (2024). Analysis oriented model for hybrid filament wound FRP-concrete-steel double skin tubular columns (DSTC) under axial compression. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 223, 109008.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.109008

Google Scholar

[14] Bai, S. C., Peng, K. D., Bai, Y. L., & Ma, J. X. (2025). Seismic behavior of full-scale PEN FRP-concrete-steel double skin tubular columns. Structures, 73, 108345.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108345

Google Scholar

[15] Deng, R., Zhang, Z., & Xiang, Y. (2025). Load-carrying mechanism of thin-walled hybrid double-skin tubular columns subjected to axial compression. Engineering Structures, 326, 119557.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119557

Google Scholar

[16] Zhou, Y. W., Liu, X. M., Xing, F., Li, D. W., Wang, Y. C., & Sui, L. L. (2017). Behavior and modeling of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns made of full lightweight aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 139, 52-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.154

Google Scholar

[17] Zhang, N., Zhao, Z. W., & Zheng, C. Y. (2022). Compression behavior of GFRP–coal gangue concrete–steel tubular columns. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 197, 104650.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104650

Google Scholar

[18] Zakir, M., Sofi, F. A., & Naqash, J. A. (2021). Compressive testing and finite element analysis-based confined concrete model for stiffened square FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103267.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103267

Google Scholar

[19] Zakir, M., Sofi, F. A., & Naqash, J. A. (2021). Experimentally verified behavior and confinement model for concrete in circular stiffened FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns. Structures, 33, 1144-1157.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.010

Google Scholar

[20] Zakir, M., & Sofi, F. A. (2022). Experimental and nonlinear FE simulation-based compressive behavior of stiffened FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns with square outer and circular inner tubes. Engineering Structures, 260, 114237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114237

Google Scholar

[21] Wang, W. Q., Wang, Z. B., Li, M. H., Xiong, Z. L., Chen, D., & Wu, C. Q. (2025). Close-range blast behavior of hybrid FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular member. Thin-Walled Structures, 113022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2025.113022

Google Scholar

[22] Gan, L., Chen, L., Zong, Z. H., & Qian, H. M. (2025). Definition of scaled distance of close-in explosion and blast load calculation model. Explosion and Shock Waves, 41(6), 130-141. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[23] China, S. A. o. (2010). Metallic materials - Tensile testing - Part 1 : Method of test at room temperature. In (Vol. GB/T 228.1-2010). Beijing, China: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[24] China, S. A. o. (2019). Standard for Test Methods of Mechanical Properties of Ordinary Concrete. In (Vol. GB/T 50081-2019). Beijing, China: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[25] International, A. (2008). Standard Test Method for Apparent Tensile Strength of Ring or Tubular Plastics and Reinforced Plastics. In (Vol. ASTM D2290-08). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.

Google Scholar