Waste from the Destruction of Industrial and Civil Infrastructure as a Resource in the Post-War Revival of Ukraine

Article Preview

Abstract:

The article substantiates the designation of Waste from Uncontrolled Destruction (WUD) as a distinct category of anthropogenic waste generated by war, terrorist attacks, natural disasters, and major technological incidents. The objective is to demonstrate the necessity of such recognition and to propose a classification model with methods for assessing WUD volumes, morphology, and risk. Methods include a review of international and national regulatory frameworks, comparative analysis with construction and demolition (C&D) waste, synthesis of international case evidence, and development of an operational WUD-A…E classification accompanied by a matrix of hazards, safety barriers, and management routes (from upfront safety assurance to sorting, decontamination, recycling, and specialized disposal). Results indicate that WUD differs materially from C&D in mixed morphology, elevated hazard, and reduced recyclability, which precludes the direct application of standard C&D approaches without prior risk reduction and robust quality control. For Ukraine, priorities are outlined: formal recognition of WUD in national waste lists, deployment of mobile and stationary debris-processing capacity, implementation of GIS-based monitoring, workforce training, and international coordination. The formal institutionalization of WUD and tailored standards are prerequisites for safe, timely, and resource-efficient post-crisis recovery.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

187-202

Citation:

Online since:

January 2026

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). (2022). World Disasters Report 2022: Trust, Equity and Local Action in a Post-COVID World. Geneva: IFRC.

DOI: 10.4135/9781412963855.n645

Google Scholar

[2] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, 2023. Information on https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4022485?ln=ru&v=pdf

DOI: 10.18356/9789210028301

Google Scholar

[3] D. Delforge, V. Wathelet, R. Below, C. L. Sofia, M. Tonnelier, J.A.F. van Loenhout, N. Speybroeck, EM-DAT: the Emergency Events Database, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 124 (2025) 105509

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105509

Google Scholar

[4] F. Zhang, C. Cao, C. Li, Y. Liu, D. Huisingh, A systematic review of recent developments in disaster waste management, J. Clean. Prod. 235 (2019) 822–840.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.229

Google Scholar

[5] C. Brown, M. Milke, E. Seville, Disaster waste management: A review article, Waste Management 31 (6) (2011) 1085–1098.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.027

Google Scholar

[6] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2007). Public Assistance Debris Management Guide (FEMA 325). Washington, DC: FEMA.

DOI: 10.1007/springerreference_225387

Google Scholar

[7] D. Carrington, Recycling rubble to rebuild Syria: War and quake debris could be turned into concrete, The Guardian, 31 March 2023. Information on https://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2023/mar/31/recycling-rubble-rebuild-syria-war-quake-concrete

Google Scholar

[8] W. Zwijnenburg, Amidst the Debris: Environmental Impact of Conflict in Syria Could Be Disastrous, PAX, 4 November 2015. Information on https://paxforpeace.nl/news/amidst-the-debris-environmental-impact-of-conflict-in-syria-could-be-disastrous/

Google Scholar

[9] United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2021). Annual Report 2021.

Google Scholar

[10] L.A. Tawil, M.A. Massoud, M. Bardus, I.Alameddine, Disaster waste management challenges and enabling factors for strategic planning: The case of the Beirut Port explosion. Waste Management & Research. 2023; 41(8):1382-1389

DOI: 10.1177/0734242X231151602

Google Scholar

[11] P.K. Robertson, L. de Melo, D.J. Williams, G.W. Wilson, Report of the Expert Panel on the Technical Causes of the Failure of Feijão Dam I, (2019)

Google Scholar

[12] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2005). Final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers (NIST NCSTAR 1). Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-85617-555-5.00029-8

Google Scholar

[13] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1996). Oklahoma City Bombing: Debris Removal and Recovery Report. Washington, DC: FEMA.

Google Scholar

[14] J.A. Atchue III, K. Dix, B. Tress, Сlearing war debris can help Ukraine move forward, New Security Beat, 4 March 2024. Information on https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2024/03/clearing-war-debris-can-help-ukraine-move-forward/

Google Scholar

[15] Norton, T. R. (2014). Disaster debris management: Recycling and reuse. (Research summary). University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Google Scholar

[16] United Nations Environment Programme & International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2011). Guidance on post-disaster debris management. Geneva: UNEP/IFRC.

Google Scholar

[17] United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Disaster Waste Management Guidelines, 2nd ed., UNEP/OCHA Joint Environment Unit, 2013. Information on https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/world/disaster-waste-management-guidelines-edition-2

DOI: 10.29171/azu_acku_pamphlet_ge320_a33_e695_2016

Google Scholar

[18] V. Kurus, Government approves procedure for management of waste generated in connection with destruction of buildings and structures as a result of hostilities, Legal Alert, 3 October 2022. Information on https://www.asterslaw.com/press_center/legal_alerts/government approves procedure for management_of_waste_generated_in_connection_with_destruction of_buildings_and_structures_as_a_result_of_hostilities/

DOI: 10.24144/2788-6018.2025.01.59

Google Scholar

[19] A.T.W. Yu, C.S. Poon, A. Wong, R. Yip, L. Jaillon, Impact of the Construction Waste Disposal Charging Scheme on work practices at construction sites in Hong Kong, Waste Management 33 (1) (2013) 138–146

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.023

Google Scholar

[20] UNDP, Haiti Technical Guide for Debris Management, United Nations Development Programme, 2017. Information on https://www.undp.org/publications/haiti-technical-guide-debris-management

Google Scholar

[21] E. Toksabay, T. Azhari, Turkey Faces Challenge "beyond Comprehension" to Clear Earthquake Rubble; Reuters: London, UK, (2023)

Google Scholar

[22] UNDP, UNDP builds two model facilities to process and recycle earthquake debris in Türkiye, United Nations Development Programme, Ankara, 2024. Information on https://www.undp.org/turkiye/press-releases/undp-builds-two-model-facilities-process-and-recycle-earthquake-debris-turkiye

DOI: 10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e550

Google Scholar

[23] UNEP, Sustainable debris management in Gaza, United Nations Environment Programme, 2025. Information on https://www.unep.org/topics/waste/sustainable-debris-management/sustainable-debris-management-gaza

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_691

Google Scholar

[24] A. Langley, M. Rahimi Azghadi, J. Smith, R. Panizza, Analyzing mixed construction and demolition waste in material recovery facilities: evolution, challenges, and applications of computer vision and deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13112, 2024

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108218

Google Scholar

[25] UNDP, UNDP launches major debris removal initiative in Ukraine to accelerate recovery, United Nations Development Programme, Kyiv, 2025. Information on https://www.undp.org/ukraine/press-releases/undp-launches-major-debris-removal-initiative-ukraine-accelerate-recovery

DOI: 10.18356/9789210029384c008

Google Scholar