Concepts for HTS and MgB2 in Transformers

Article Preview

Abstract:

After the emergence of AC NbTi strands, superconducting transformers were successfully built. But the very high cost of 4 K cryogenics made these transformers economically not attractive. The high Tc superconductors (HTS), operating at much higher temperatures, change these conclusions with low cost HTS conductors. The high cost of PIT tapes and the relatively large AC losses remain issues. The second generation HTS wires, the REBCO coated conductors, are under development and achieved substantial progress recently. They operate at higher temperatures and intrinsically show lower AC losses especially for transformers. MgB2 is the third option. The magnetic flux density conditions make possible the operation at 27 K and they show low costs. This paper provides a preliminary design for an on-board 40 MVA transformer using YBCO coated conductors and MgB2 wires. Both superconducting transformers show similar volume and weight. The power density per unit mass and volume is improved by a factor about two, cryogenic included, compared to resistive systems. This makes them very attractive for on-board mobile systems. The economical point of view will be discussed based on some targets price/performance for superconductors and cryocoolers. MgB2 is penalized by its operation at lower temperature (27 K / 77 K), which makes cryogenics very expensive. The advantage of the low cost of MgB2 compared to REBCO may be lost except with very low AC loss MgB2 tapes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

195-203

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Riemersma, M.L. Barton, D.C. Litz, P.W. Eckels, J.H. Murphy and J.F. Roach: IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. 100 (1981), p.3398.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1981.316682

Google Scholar

[2] A. Février and Y. Laumond: Proceedings of ICEC 10, Berlin (1986), p.139.

Google Scholar

[3] W. V. Hassenzahl, D. W. Hazelton, B. K. Johnson, P. Komarek, M. Noe and C. T. Reis: Proceeding of the IEEE, Vol. 92 (2004), p.1655.

DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2004.833674

Google Scholar

[4] R. Teranishi, T. Izumi and Y. Shiohara: Superconductor Science and Technology, Vol. 19 (2006), p. S4.

Google Scholar

[5] S.R. Foltyn, H. Wang, L. Civale, Q.X. Jiaz, P.N. Arendt, B. Maiorov, Y. Li, M.P. Maley and J.L. MacManus-Driscoll: Applied Physics letters, Vol. 87 (2005), p.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2106021

Google Scholar

[6] American Superconductor: http: /www. amsuper. com.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Tixador, Y. Cointe, T. Trollier, E. Maher and A. Usoskin: IEEE Trans. on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 15 (2005), p.1847.

DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2005.849310

Google Scholar

[8] S.W. Schwenterly, S.P. Mehta, M.S. Walker and R.H. Jones: Physica C, Vol. 382 (2002), p.1.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Goldaker, R. Nast, G. Kotzyba, S.I. Schlachter, A. Frank, B. Ringsdorf, C. Schmidt and P. Komarek: EUCAS'05, Vienna, September (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] G. Grasso, A. Malagoli, A. Tumino, C. Fanciulli, D. Nardelli, C. Ferdeghini and A.S. Siri: Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No 181 (2004), p.45.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Leghissa, B. Gromoll, J. Rieger, M. Oomen, H. -W. Neumüller, R. Schlosser, H. Schmidt, W. Knorr, M. Meinert and U. Henning: Physica C, Vol. 372-376 (2002), p.1688.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(02)01102-4

Google Scholar

[12] W.J. Carr: IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, Vol. 15 (1979), p.240.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Däumling: Physica C, Vol. 403 (2004), p.57.

Google Scholar

[14] N. Hill, presentation at « The coming revolution in superconducting electric drives », 23rd October 2003, London.

Google Scholar