Investigation of Fluctuating Diamagnetism and Spin Dynamics in SmFeAsO1-xFx Superconductors

Article Preview

Abstract:

The superconducting iron-pnictides SmFeAsO1-xFx (x = 0.15 and x = 0.2) are studied by means of 19F-NMR spectroscopy and SQUID magnetometry. Fluctuating diamagnetism above Tc is briefly examined, stressing the analogy with the phenomenology in underdoped cuprates. The 19F relaxation rate allows us to infer an indirect magnetic coupling between Sm3+ moments, possibly involving conduction electrons in FeAs bands, with no appreciable effects on crossing the superconducting transition temperature. A comparison between the superconducting samples and the insulating SmOF, often present as spurious phase in SmFeAsO1-xFx pnictides, is also carried out. Relevant differences in the spin dynamics features are found.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-146

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Special issue, Physica C 468 (9 – 12) (2009).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Rigamonti, F. Borsa and P. Carretta: Rep. Prog. Phys. 61 (1998), p.1367.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Sanna, R. De Renzi, G. Lamura, C. Ferdeghini, A. Palenzona, M. Putti, M. Tropeano and T. Shiroka: Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10948-009-0472-y

Google Scholar

[4] S. Sanna, R. De Renzi, G. Lamura, C. Ferdeghini, A. Martinelli, A. Palenzona, M. Putti and M. Tropeano: J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 22 (2009), p.585.

DOI: 10.1007/s10948-009-0472-y

Google Scholar

[5] E. Bernardi, A. Lascialfari, A. Rigamonti, L. Romanò, M. Scavini and C. Oliva: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010), p.064502 and references therein.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.064502

Google Scholar

[6] G. Prando, A. Lascialfari, A. Rigamonti, L. Romanò and S. Sanna (to be published).

Google Scholar

[7] J. Hölsä, E. Säilynoja, P. Ylhä, P. Porcher, P. Dereń and W. Stręk: J. Phys. Chem. 100 (1996), p.14736.

DOI: 10.1021/jp960348+

Google Scholar

[8] G. Prando, P. Carretta, A. Rigamonti, S. Sanna, A. Palenzona, M. Putti and M. Tropeano: Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010), p.100508(R).

Google Scholar

[9] E. M. Brüning, C. Krellner, M. Baenitz, A. Jesche, F. Steglich and C. Geibel: Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), p.117206.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.117206

Google Scholar

[10] K. Ahilan, F. L. Ning, T. Imai, A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales and D. Mandrus: Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008), p.100501(R).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Nakai, K. Ishida, Y. Kamihara, M. Hirano and H. Hosono: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 (2008), p.073701.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Sato, Y. Kobayashi, S. C. Lee, H. Takahashi, E. Satomi and Y. Miura: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79 (2010), p.014710.

Google Scholar

[13] D. H. Ryan, J. M. Cadogan, C. Ritter, F. Canepa, A. Palenzona and M. Putti: Phys. Rev. B 80 (2009), p.220503(R).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Jeglič, J. -W. G. Bos, A. Zorko, M. Brunelli, K. Koch, H. Rosner, S. Margadonna and D. Arčon: Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009), p.094515.

Google Scholar