Impact of Biobased Surfactants on Hygrothermal Behaviour of Gypsum Foams

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reduce the impact of the building sector has become a key point of sustainable development. The production of lightweight materials for the building industry is therefore a must. To produce such materials, foaming is a process commonly used to trap air bubbles and achieve a range of low densities. A sufficient low thermal conductivity and an acceptable ability to regulate humidity variations in order to limit overall energy consumption are the sought properties. In this study, a direct foaming method is applied to formulate gypsum foams using a commercial Plaster and two biobased foaming agents based on proteins. An anionic surfactant (α-olefin sulphonate sodium salt) is used as a reference surfactant. Varying the mixing time, protein content and water content, gypsum foams were produced. The foam volume is measured continuously during the mixing step and the foam homogeneity is controlled. The densities of fresh foams and of the hardened foams are used to identify the links between formulation and foams properties. Gypsum foam specimens with different densities ranging from 300 to 750 kg/m3 are produced. The thermal conductivity and the Moisture Buffer Value measurements are performed. Such properties appear directly linked to the porosity and pore connection of the foams. The obtained results highlight the contribution of biobased surfactant to the performance of gypsum foams.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

715-722

Citation:

Online since:

January 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Amziane, S., Collet, F., et. al. 2017. Bio-aggregates Based Building Materials: State-of-the-Art Report of the RILEM Technical Committee 236-BBM. Springer.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1031-0

Google Scholar

[2] Eichhammer W., Herbst A., Pfaff M., Fleiter T., Pfluger B., 2018. Impact on the environment and the economy of technological innovations for the Innovation Fund (IF) : in the fields of : energy-intensive industries, renewables, carbon capture and storage / use (CCS/CCU), energy storage.

Google Scholar

[3] Fang, L., Clausen, G., Fanger, P.O., 1998. Impact of Temperature and Humidity on Perception of Indoor Air Quality During Immediate and Longer Whole-Body Exposures. Indoor Air 8, 276–284.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.00008.x

Google Scholar

[4] Lanos, C., Glouannec, P., Mounanga, P., Collet, F., Thomas, P., Poullain, P., Pretot, S., 2010. Construire et réhabiliter : vers quelles solutions d'isolation ?. Colloque Matériaux - Génie civil et habitat du futur, Nantes.

DOI: 10.1051/mattech/2011047

Google Scholar

[5] Mazhoud, B., Viel, M., Collet, F., Phelipot-Mardelé, A., Lanos, C., Pretot, S., 2017. Is hemp lime concrete a mix of hemp and lime. 2nd International Conference on Bio-based Building Materials & 1st Conference on ECOlogical valorisation of GRAnular and FIbrous materials. Clermont-Ferrand, France.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.121

Google Scholar

[6] Pachauri, R., Meyer, L., Myles, R., 2014. IPCC 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107415416

Google Scholar

[7] Rode, C., Peuhkuri, R., Time, B., Gustavsen, A., Ojanen, T., Svennberg, K., Ahonen, J., Arfuidsson, J., 2005. Moisture Buffering of Building Materials, Technical report (No. BYG Report, No. R-127). Technical University of Denmark.

DOI: 10.1520/stp45403s

Google Scholar

[8] Huovila P., Ala-Juusela M., Melchert L., Pouffary S., Cheng C.-C., Ürge-Vorsatz D. et al. 2009. Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme, 62 p.

Google Scholar