Hydro-Mechanics Coupling on Rammed Earth Material: Drying Experiment at Structural Scale

Abstract:

Rammed earth structures are very sensitive to hydric conditions. Experimental studies have been undertaken to understand the link between liquid water transfer and mechanical behavior at structural scale. This study was done on a prismatic rammed earth sample of 15cm x 15cm x 45cm, structured as a wall element with several layers. Samples were subjected to one dimensional drying in an indoor environment. Humidity and temperature sensors were placed on each layer inside the sample. The kinetic of drying was monitored by continuous weighing the sample and humidity measurement at a regular interval. Results of water content evolution suggest that samples dry in two stages; the first stage is associated with relatively high evaporation flux of 13.88 g m^-2h^-1 while the second stage has very low flux of moisture evaporation. Unconfined compressive strength was performed in drying samples after 0, 2, 6 and 8 weeks of drying. In parallel, digital image correlation was used to determine the stiffness of samples. Results show an increase in compressive strength by the rate of 98 kPa per week in the first two weeks, then this rate reduces to 23 KPa per weeks after 8 weeks. These experimental results will allow to enhance the 3D hydro mechanical numerical model developed in the laboratory.

• Periodical: Construction Technologies and Architecture (Volume 1)
• Pages: 698-706
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/CTA.1.698
• Online since: January 2022
• Authors: Taini Chitimbo*, Feras Abdul-Samad, Noémie Prime, Olivier Plé
• Keywords: Compression Strength, Hydro-Mechanical Coupling, Rammed Earth, Relative Humidity

References

[1] Beckett, C. (2012). The Effect of Relative Humidity and Temperature on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rammed Earth The Effect of Relative Humidity and Temperature on the Unconfined Compressive. May 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31116-1_39

[2] Bui, Q. B., Morel, J. C., Hans, S., & Walker, P. (2014). Effect of moisture content on the mechanical characteristics of rammed earth. Construction and Building Materials, 54, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.067.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.067

[3] Champiré, F., Fabbri, A., Morel, J. C., Wong, H., & McGregor, F. (2016). Impact of relative humidity on the mechanical behavior of compacted earth as a building material. Construction and Building Materials, 110, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.027

[4] Chauhan, P., El Hajjar, A., Prime, N., & Plé, O. (2019). Unsaturated behavior of rammed earth: Experimentation towards numerical modelling. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.027.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.027

[5] François, B., Palazon, L., & Gerard, P. (2017). Structural behaviour of unstabilized rammed earth constructions submitted to hygroscopic conditions. 155, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.012.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.012

[6] Fontaine L., Anger R. (2009). Bâtir en terre. Du grain de sable à l'architecture, Belin, Cité des sciences et de l'industrie.

[7] French Standard NF P 94-057. 1992. Soil: Investigation and Testing – Grain Size Analysis – Hydrometer Method., AFNOR.

[8] Hall, M., & Djerbib, Y. (2004). Rammed earth sample production: Context, recommendations and consistency. Construction and Building Materials, 18(4), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.001.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2003.11.001

[9] Hall . C, W.D Hoff, M.R. Nixon, (1984). Water movement in porous Building materials-VI. Evaporation and drying in bricks and block materals.Building environment 19.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(84)90009-x

[10] Jaquin, P. A., Augarde, C. E., & Legrand, L. (2008). Unsaturated characteristics of rammed earth. Unsaturated Soils: Advances in Geo-Engineering - Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Unsaturated Soils, E-UNSAT 2008, 1995, 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203884430.ch53.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203884430.ch53

[11] Miccoli, L., Müller, U., & Fontana, P. (2014). Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob. Construction and Building Materials, 61, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009