Experimental Study of Parameters Affecting the Temperature of an Absorption Tube of Parabolic Trough Collector

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper some important parameters affecting the temperature increase of the fluid inside an absorption tube of parabolic trough collector have been experimentally investigated using the Design of Experiments (DOE) method. These parameters are: absorption tube length, fluids type and fluid flow rate. The design of an absorption tube as well as a solar parabolic trough collector has been changed into different ways in order to increase the fluid temperature inside the absorption tube. The design of experiments plays a major role in identifying which factors are significant in increasing the temperature absorption inside the tube. The DOE method was validated using an experimental setup that is designed and fabricated by the Department of Mechanical Technology at Riyadh College of Technology. The experiments have been done on all the factors considered randomly using factorial design by merging all the factors together to know which factors and their interactions can affect more on increasing the fluid temperature inside absorption tube. Eight experiments with three replicates have been chosen randomly. From the results it is seen that the most significant effective factor to maximize fluid temperature is the flow rate and the interaction between absorption tube length and fluid type. It also was found that fluid temperature inside the collector was maximized when hydraulic oil was used as the heat transfer fluid and when the tube length was 436 mm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

84-91

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.P., Holman, Experimental Methods for Engineers, seventh ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] D. C. Montgomery, Design analysis of experiments, fifth ed., John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] C. Müller, K. Schwarzer, E. Vieira da Silva , and C. Mertes, Solar Thermal Desalination Systems with Multi-layer Heat Recovery, Original Research Article Desalination. 137 (2001) 23-29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(01)00200-4

Google Scholar

[4] Information on http: /www. tpub. com/utilities/index. html.

Google Scholar

[5] Information on http: /www. canren. gc. ca/tech. appl/index. asp.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Guo, and A. Mettas: 2010: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, San Jose, CA, USA, (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Vaxman, M. Sokolov, Effects of connecting pipes in thermosyphonic solar systems, Solar Energy. 37 (1986) 323-330.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(86)90128-3

Google Scholar

[8] Y. H. Zurigat, P. R. Liche, A. J. Ghajar, Influence of the inlet geometry on mixing in thermocline thermal energy storage, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer. 34 (1991) 115-125.

DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(91)90179-i

Google Scholar

[9] R. Tang, Z. Li, H. Zhong, Q. Lan, Assessment of uncertainty in mean heat loss coefficient of all glass evacuated solar collector tube testing, Energy Conversion and Management. 47 (2006) 60-67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.03.013

Google Scholar

[10] A. ValanArasu, T. Sornakumar, Design, manufacture and testing of fiberglass reinforced parabola trough for parabolic trough solar collectors, Solar Energy. 81 (2007) 1273-1279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2007.01.005

Google Scholar

[11] N. S. Kumar, K.S. Reddy, Comparison of receivers for solar dish collector system, Energy Conversion and Management. 49 (2008) 812-819.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.07.026

Google Scholar

[12] A. Fernandez-Garcia, E. Zarza, L. Valenzuela, M. Perez, Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14 (2010) 1695-1721.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.03.012

Google Scholar

[13] A. S. Gudekar, A. S. Jadhav, S. V. Panse, J. B. Joshi, A. B. Pandit, Cost effective design of compound parabolic collector for steam generation, Solar Energy. 90 (2013) 43-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.12.020

Google Scholar

[14] M. Souliotis, D. Chemisana, Y.G. Caouris, Y. Tripanagnostopoulos, Experimental study of integrated collector storage solar water heaters, Renewable Energy. 50 (2013) 1083-1094.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.061

Google Scholar

[15] M. Tanveer, G. T. Guyer, Solar assisted photo degradation of wastewater by compound parabolic collectors: Review of design and operational parameters, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 24 (2013) 534-543.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.053

Google Scholar

[16] M. Raisul Islam, K. Sumathy, Samee Ullah Khan, Solar water heating systems and their market trends, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 17 (2013) 1-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.011

Google Scholar

[17] M. Pidhuwan, S. Teekasap and J. Khedari, The Effective Length of Solar Parabolic Concentrating Collector, The Joint International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE). (2004) 67-70.

Google Scholar