Effect of FLiBe Infiltration Pressure on Microstructure of Matrix for TMSR Fuel Elements (FEs)

Article Preview

Abstract:

The matrix graphite of fuel elements (FEs) with infiltration of 2LiF-BeF2(FLiBe) at different pressures varying from 0.4 MPa to 1.0 MPa, has been studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and positron annihilation lifetime (PAL) measurement. The result of XRD reveals that diffraction patterns of FLiBe appear in matrix graphite infiltrated with FLiBe at a pressure of 0.8 MPa and 1.0 MPa. The surface morphology from SEM shows that FLiBe mainly distributes within macro-pores of matrix graphite. PAL measurement indicates that there are mainly two positron lifetime components in all specimens:τ1~0.21 ns and τ2 ­~0.47 ns, ascribed to annihilation of positrons in bulk and trapped-positrons at surface, respectively. The average positron lifetime decreases with infiltration pressure, due to the decrease in annihilation fraction of positrons with surface after infiltration of FLiBe into macro-pores.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

189-192

Citation:

Online since:

March 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A technology roadmap for Generation IV nuclear Energy systems, USDOE/GIG-002-00 report, The U.S. DOE nuclear research advisory committee and Generation IV International forum, 11, 33 (2002).

DOI: 10.2172/859029

Google Scholar

[2] M.H. Jiang, H.J. Xu, et al. Advanced fission energy program-TMSR nuclear energy system. Bull Chin. Acad. Sci., 27(2012) 366.

Google Scholar

[3] Advances in high temperature gas cooled reactor fuel technology. IAEA-TECDOC-1674, Vienna, Austria, (2012).

Google Scholar

[4] R.C. Robertson, MSRE design and operation report PART I: Description of reactor design, ORNL-TM-728, U.S. Atomic energy Commission, (1965).

DOI: 10.2172/4654707

Google Scholar

[5] C.H. Tang, Y.P. Tang, et al., Design and manufacture of the fuel element for the 10MW high temperature gas-cooled reactor. Nucl. Eng. Design 218 (2002) 91–102.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(02)00201-7

Google Scholar

[6] K. G. Lynn, J R MacDonald, R.A. Boie, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 241-244.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Asoka-Kumar, M. Alatalo, V. J. Ghosh, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2097-2100.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Nagai, M. Hasegawa, Z. Tang, et al. Phys. Rev. B. 61 (2000) 6574-78.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Iwata, H. Fukushima, M. Shimotomai, et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 20 (1981) 1799-1806.

Google Scholar

[10] Y.C. Jean, K. Venkateswaran, E. Parsais et al., Appl. Phys. A 35 (1984) 169-176.

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Tang, M. Hasagawa et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., (1999) 2532-2535.

Google Scholar

[12] T. Tanabe, K. Niwase, N. Tsukuda, et al. J. Nucl. Mater. (1992) 191–194; 330–4.

Google Scholar

[13] S.F. Bartram, E.F. Kaelble, Handbook of X-rays for diffraction, emission, absorption, and microscopy, New York, 1967, p.17. 1–17. 18.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Bisi, A. Fiorentini and L. Zappa, Phys. Rev. 134A (1964) 328.

Google Scholar

[15] K.P. Singh and R.M. Singru, Chem. Phys. Lett. 10 (1971) 328-330.

Google Scholar