Study of Differences between Results from Raboratory Tests and Tests of Real Tools for Selected Cold Work Tool Steels

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing pressure on tool performance and durability increases demands on the materials used and on the choice of optimal heat treatment. The properties of tool steels produced by conventional and powder metallurgy (1.2379, Vanadis 23) were compared after different heat treatment modes. Cryogenic treatment was performed in several batches for 4 hours at-90°C or-196°C. Cryogenic treatment was inserted between quenching and tempering. Mechanical properties were evaluated by hardness tests and three-point bending strength and wear resistance by Pin-on-disk tests. Metallographic analysis was performed using light and electron microscopy. On the basis of the results obtained both materials were subject to selected heat treatment and experimental forming tools produced which were used in operation. During operation the wear of the tools (shape change and volume loss) was assessed. Results of the laboratory tests were then compared with operation tests.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-123

Citation:

Online since:

August 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] CAMPBELL, F. Elements of metallurgy and engineering alloys. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, 2008. ISBN 978-0-87170-867-0.

Google Scholar

[2] TOTTEN, George. Steel heat treatment: metallurgy and technologies. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, 2007. ISBN 978-0-8493-8455-4.

Google Scholar

[3] GRINDER, Olle. The HIP way to make cleaner, better steels. Metal Powder Report. 2007, 62(9), 16-22.

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0657(07)70190-x

Google Scholar

[4] SURBERG, Cord, Paul STRATTON a Klaus LINGENHÖLE. The effect of some heat treatment parameters on the dimensional stability of AISI D2. Cryogenics. 2008, 48(1-2), 42-47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2007.10.002

Google Scholar

[5] DAS, Debdulal, Apurba DUTTA a Kalyan RAY. Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part I. Microstructure and hardness. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2010, 527(9), 2182-2193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.070

Google Scholar

[6] DAS, Debdulal, Rajdeep SARKAR, Apurba DUTTA a Kalyan RAY. Influence of sub-zero treatments on fracture toughness of AISI D2 steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2010, 528(2), 589-603.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.057

Google Scholar

[7] BALDISSERA, P. a C. DELPRETE. Deep Cryogenic Treatment: A Bibliographic Review. The Open Mechanical Engineering Journal. 2008, 2(1), 1-11.

DOI: 10.2174/1874155x00802010001

Google Scholar

[8] SOBOTOVÁ, J., M. KUŘÍK, Z. KOLÁŘ a P. PRIKNEROVÁ. Effect of Conditions of Cryogenic Treatment on the Properties of Selected Cold Work Tool Steels. HTM Journal of Heat Treatment and Materials [online]. 2017, 72(2), 99-103 [cit. 2018-08-27].

DOI: 10.3139/105.110318

Google Scholar

[9] GHASEMI-NANESA, Hadi a Mohammad JAHAZI. Simultaneous enhancement of strength and ductility in cryogenically treated AISI D2 tool steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2014, 598, 413-419.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.065

Google Scholar

[10] LESKOVŠEK, V., M. KALIN a J. VIŽINTIN. Influence of deep-cryogenic treatment on wear resistance of vacuum heat-treated HSS. Vacuum. 2006, 80(6), 507-518.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2005.08.023

Google Scholar

[11] AKINCIOğLU, Sıtkı, Hasan GÖKKAYA a İlyas UYGUR. A review of cryogenic treatment on cutting tools. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2015, 78(9-12), 1609-1627.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-6755-x

Google Scholar

[12] GILL, Simranpreet, Jagdev SINGH, Rupinder SINGH a Harpreet SINGH. Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on AISI M2 High Speed Steel: Metallurgical and Mechanical Characterization. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 2012, 21(7), 1320-1326.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-011-0032-z

Google Scholar

[13] LI, Haizhi, Weiping TONG, Junjun CUI, Hui ZHANG, Liqing CHEN a Liang ZUO. The influence of deep cryogenic treatment on the properties of high-vanadium alloy steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2016, 662, 356-362.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.039

Google Scholar

[14] DAS, D., A.K. DUTTA a K.K. RAY. Influence of varied cryotreatment on the wear behavior of AISI D2 steel. Wear. 2009, 266(1-2), 297-309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.07.001

Google Scholar

[15] KHUN, Nay, Erjia LIU, Adrian TAN, D. SENTHILKUMAR, Bensely ALBERT a D. MOHAN LAL. Effects of deep cryogenic treatment on mechanical and tribological properties of AISI D3 tool steel. Friction. 2015, 3(3), 234-242.

DOI: 10.1007/s40544-015-0089-z

Google Scholar

[16] PILLAI, Nandakumar, R KARTHIKEYAN, Sathish KANNAN a S. VINCENT. Effect of Cryogenic treatment on VIKING cold working tool steel and development of wear mechanism maps. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018, 26(), 329-342.

DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.041

Google Scholar

[17] LI, Junji, Xianguo YAN, Xiaoyang LIANG, Hong GUO a D.Y. LI. Influence of different cryogenic treatments on high-temperature wear behavior of M2 steel. Wear [online]. 2017, 376-377, 1112-1121 [cit. 2018-12-09].

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.11.041

Google Scholar

[18] STRATTON, P.F. Optimising nano-carbide precipitation in tool steels. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2007, 449-451, 809-812.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.162

Google Scholar

[19] LIU, Shangtan, Xiaochun WU, Lei SHI, Yiwen WU a Wei QU. Influence of Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and Properties Improvement of Die Steel. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering. 2015, 03(09), 37-46.

DOI: 10.4236/msce.2015.39005

Google Scholar

[20] SOBOTOVÁ, Jana, Martin KUŘÍK a Jiří CEJP. Influence of Heat Treatment Conditions on Properties of High-Speed P/M Steel Vanadis 30. Key Engineering Materials. 2015, 647, 17-22.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.647.17

Google Scholar

[21] PENG, Hanlin, Ling HU, Liejun LI, Liyun ZHANG a Xianglin ZHANG. Evolution of the microstructure and mechanical properties of powder metallurgical high-speed steel S390 after heat treatment. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2018, 740, 766-773.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.264

Google Scholar

[22] SOBOTOVÁ, Jana, Martin KUŘÍK a Jakub LACZA. Effect of Chemical Composition and Heat Treatment Parameters on the Structure and Properties of Vanadis 23 and Vanadis 30 PM High-Speed Steels. Solid State Phenomena. 2017, 270, 258-264.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.270.258

Google Scholar

[23] JURČI, Peter, Mária DOMÁNKOVÁ, Ľubomír ČAPLOVIČ et al. Microstructure and hardness of sub-zero treated and no tempered P/M Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel. Vacuum [online]. 2015, 111, 92-101 [cit. 2018-12-09].

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.10.004

Google Scholar

[24] SOBOTOVA, Jana, Petr JURCI a Ivo DLOUHY. The effect of subzero treatment on microstructure, fracture toughness, and wear resistance of Vanadis 6 tool steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2016, 652, 192-204.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.078

Google Scholar

[25] PTAČINOVÁ, Jana, Viktória SEDLICKÁ, Mária HUDÁKOVÁ, Ivo DLOUHÝ a Peter JURČI. Microstructure – Toughness relationships in sub-zero treated and tempered Vanadis 6 steel compared to conventional treatment. Materials Science and Engineering: A [online]. 2017, 702, 241-258 [cit. 2018-12-09].

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.007

Google Scholar

[26] Material datasheet, tool steel for cold working: 1.2379. -. Praha: -, (2006).

Google Scholar

[27] GILL, Simranpreet, Jagdev SINGH, Rupinder SINGH a Harpreet SINGH. Metallurgical principles of cryogenically treated tool steels—a review on the current state of science. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2011, 54(1-4), 59-82.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2935-5

Google Scholar

[28] KORADE, D.N., K.V. RAMANA, K.R. JAGTAP a N.B. DHOKEY. Effect of Deep Cryogenic Treatment on Tribological Behaviour of D2 Tool Steel - An Experimental Investigation. Materials today: Proceedings. 2017, 4(8), 7665-7673.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.100

Google Scholar

[29] OPPENKOWSKI, A., S. WEBER a W. THEISEN. Evaluation of factors influencing deep cryogenic treatment that affect the properties of tool steels. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2010, 210(14), 1949-1955.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.007

Google Scholar

[30] SINGH, Gurnam, Simranpreet GILL a Manu DOGRA. Techno-economic analysis of blanking punch life improvement by environment friendly cryogenic treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017, 143(2017), 1060-1068.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.013

Google Scholar

[31] KUŘÍK, M., J. LACZA, T. VLACH a J. SOBOTOVÁ. Study of the properties and structure of selected tool steels for cold work depending on the parameters of heat treatment. Materiali in tehnologije. 2017, 51(4), 585-589.

DOI: 10.17222/mit.2016.120

Google Scholar

[32] Material datasheet, tool steel for cold working: Vanadis 23. -. Sweden: -, 2014. Available from: http://www.uddeholm.com/files/PB_Uddeholm_vanadis_23_english.pdf.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.ad.ts0820

Google Scholar

[33] ASTM G99-05(2010): Standard Test Method for Wear Testing with a Pin-on-Disk Apparatus. 03.02. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, (2010).

Google Scholar

[34] KALSI, Nirmal, Rakesh SEHGAL a Vishal SHARMA. Cryogenic Treatment of Tool Materials: A Review. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2010, 25(10), 1077-1100.

DOI: 10.1080/10426911003720862

Google Scholar

[35] DA SILVA, Flávio, Sinésio FRANCO, Álisson MACHADO, Emmanuel EZUGWU a Antônio SOUZA. Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear [online]. 2006, 261(5-6), 674-685 [cit. 2018-08-04].

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.017

Google Scholar

[36] ČSN EN ISO 6508-1. Metallic materials - Rockwell hardness test. 2005. Prague: Czech Standards Institute, (2006).

Google Scholar