Formation of Microstructure during Sub-Zero Treatments of Chromium and Chromium-Vanadium Ledeburitic Steels

Abstract:

Despite the fact that the sub-zero treatment has widely been employed in various industrial branches more than 100 years, metallurgical principles of microstructural alterations was discovered only over past several years. Many experimental works have been done in order to describe what happens in the microstructures of various steels when they are subjected to the treatment within a temperature range 4 - 273 K and for different durations of this treatment. The obtained results infer that the changes in microstructure and thus in mechanical properties depend not only on the treatment regime used, but they are closely related to the steel chemistry. The current paper summarizes the findings obtained by sub-zero treatments of two different ledeburitic tool steels (AISI D2 and Vanadis 6). The changes in retained austenite characteristics, alterations in martensitic structures, variations in carbide characteristics and modifications in precipitation behaviour are demonstrated and discussed.

• Periodical: Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volume 403)
• Pages: 19-36
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.403.19
• Online since: September 2020
• Authors: Peter Jurči*
• Keywords: Carbides, High-Carbon High-Alloyed Steels, Martensite, Microstructure, Precipitation, Retained Austenite, Sub-Zero Treatment

References

[1] T.P. Sweeney, Deep cryogenics: the great cold debate, Heat Treating, 2 (1986), 28 – 33.

[2] W. Reitz, J. Pendray, Cryoprocessing of Materials: A Review of Current Status, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 16 (2001) 829 – 840.

DOI: 10.1081/amp-100108702

[3] P.F. Stratton, Optimising nano-carbide precipitation in tool steels, Mater. Sci. Eng., A449-451 (2007) 809 – 812.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.162

[4] Z. Zurecki, Cryogenic Quenching of Steel Revisited, In: Proc. 23rd Heat Treating Society Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2005, eds. Herring, D., Hill, R. 106 – 114.

[5] Sverker 21 Cold work tool steel. www.uddeholm.com.

[6] H. Berns, Restaustenit in ledeburitischen Chromstählen und seine Umwandlung durch Kaltumformen, Tiefkühlen und Anlassen, HTM J. Heat Treat. Mater., 29 (1974), 236–247.

DOI: 10.1515/htm-1974-290402

[7] V.G. Gavriljuk, W. Theisen, V.V. Sirosh, E.V. Polshin, A. Kortmann, G.S. Mogilny, Yu.N. Petrov, Y.V. Tarusin, Low-temperature martensitic transformation in tool steels in relation to their deep cryogenic treatment, Acta Mater., 61 (2013), 1705 – 1715.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.045

[8] D. Das, A.K. Dutta, K.K. Ray, Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: Part I. Microstructure and hardness. Mater. Sci. Eng., A527 (2010), 2182 – 2193.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.070

[9] D. Das, A.K. Dutta, K.K. Ray, Influence of varied cryotreatment on the wear behaviour of AISI D2 steel, Wear, 266 (2009), 297 – 309.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.07.001

[10] K. Amini, A. Akhbarizadeh, S. Javadpour, Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the formation of nano-sized carbides and the wear behaviour of D2 tool steel, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 19 (2012), 795 – 799.

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-012-0630-2

[11] F. Meng, K. Tagashira, R. Azuma, H. Sohma, Role of Eta-carbide Precipitation´s in the Wear Resistance Improvements of Fe-12Cr-Mo-V-1.4C Tool Steel by Cryogenic Treatment, ISIJ Int., 34 (1994), 205 - 210.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.34.205

[12] C.H. Surberg, P. Stratton, K. Lingenhöle, The effect of some heat treatment parameters on the dimensional stability of AISI D2, Cryogenics, 48 (2008), 42 – 47.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2007.10.002

[13] V.G. Gavriljuk, V.V. Sirosh, Yu.N. Petrov, A.I. Tyshchenko, W. Theisen, A. Kortmann, Carbide precipitation during tempering of a tool steel subjected to deep cryogenic treatment, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 45 (2014), 2453 – 2465.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2202-8

[14] J. Pietikainen, Effects of the aging of martensite on its deformation characteristics and on fracture in Fe – Ni – Si – C steel, J. Iron Steel Inst. 1 (1968), 74 – 78.

[15] D.N. Collins, J. Dormer, Deep Cryogenic Treatment of a D2 Cold-Work Tool Steel, Heat Treat. Met., 24 (1997), 71 - 74.

[16] D.N. Collins, Deep cryogenic treatment of tool steels - a review, Heat Treat. Met., 2 (1996), 40 – 42.

[17] D.N. Collins, Cryogenic treatment of tool steels, Adv. Mater. Process., 12 (1998), 24 – 29.

[18] P. Jurči, M. Dománková, L. Čaplovič, J. Ptačinová, J. Sobotová, P. Salabová, O. Prikner, B. Šuštaršič, D. Jenko, Microstructure and hardness of sub-zero treated and no tempered P/M Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel, Vacuum, 111 (2015), 92 – 101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.10.004

[19] D. Das, K.K. Ray, Structure-property correlation of subzero treated AISI D2 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A541 (2012), 45 – 60.

[20] M. Nemec, P. Jurči, P. Kosnáčová, M. Kučerová, Evaluation of structural isotropy of Cr-V ledeburitic steel made by powder metallurgy of rapidly solidified particles, Kovove Mater. 54 (2016), 453 – 462.

DOI: 10.4149/km_2016_6_453

[21] S. Morito, J. Nishikawa, T. Maki, Dislocation Density within Lath Martensite in Fe-C and Fe-Ni Alloys, ISIJ Int., 43 (2003), 1475 – 1477.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.43.1475

[22] J. Ďurica, J. Ptačinová, M. Dománková, L. Čaplovič, M. Čaplovičová, L. Hrušovská, V. Malovcová, P. Jurči, Changes in microstructure of ledeburitic tool steel due to vacuum austenitizing and quenching, sub-zero treatments at −140°C and tempering, Vacuum 170 (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.108977.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2019.108977

[23] P. Jurči, M. Dománková, M. Hudáková, J. Ptačinová, M. Pašák, P. Palček, Characterization of microstructure and tempering response of conventionally quenched, short- and long-time sub-zero treated PM Vanadis 6 ledeburitic tool steel, Mater. Charact., 134 (2017), 398 – 415.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.10.029

[24] G.T. Eldis, M. Cohen, Strength of initially virgin martensite at -196 °C after aging and tempering. Metall. Trans., 14A (1983), 1007 – 1012.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02659848

[25] M.J. Van Genderen, A. Boettger, R.J. Cernik, E.J. Mittemeijer, Early Stages of Decomposition in Iron-Carbon and Iron-Nitrogen Martensites: Diffraction Analysis Using Synchrotron Radiation. Metall. Trans., 24A (1993), 1965 – (1973).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02666331

[26] M. Villa, M.F. Hansen, M.A.J. Somers, Martensite formation in Fe-C alloys at cryogenic temperatures, Scr. Mater. 141 (2017) 129–132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.005

[27] A.J. McEvily, R.C. Ku, T.L. Johnston, The source of martensite strength, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 236 (1966), 108 – 114.

[28] J. Pietikainen, Effects of the aging of martensite on its deformation characteristics and on fracture in Fe – Ni – Si – C steel, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, 1 (1968), 74 – 78.

[29] M. Pašák, Study of the phase transformations kinetics in high alloy systems based on iron. PhD Thesis. Trnava: Faculty of Materials and Technology, Trnava, (2015).

[30] H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, Cementite, International Mater. Rev., 2019,.

[31] M. Umemoto, Y. Todaka, K. Tsuchiya, Mechanical properties of cementite and fabrication of artificial pearlite, Mater. Sci. Forum, 426-432 (2003), 859 – 864.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.426-432.859

[32] L.E. Kar´kina, T.A. Zubkova, I.L. Yakovleva, Dislocation Structure of Cementite in Granular Pearlite after Cold Plastic Deformation, The Physics of Metals and Metallography 114 (2013), 234 – 241.

DOI: 10.1134/s0031918x13030095

[33] S. Li, N. Min, J. Li, X. Wu, Ch. Li, L. Tang, Experimental verification of segregation of carbon and precipitation of carbides due to deep cryogenic treatment for tool steel by internal friction method, Mater. Sci. Eng., A575 (2013), 51 – 60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.070

[34] P. Jurči, Sub-Zero Treatment of Cold Work Tool Steels – Metallurgical Background and the Effect on Microstructure and Properties, HTM J. Heat Treat. Mater., 72 (2017), 62 – 68.

DOI: 10.3139/105.110301