Quasi-Static and Dynamic Mechanical Response of Alloy 625 Fabricated Using Laser Powder Bed Fusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Additive manufacturing can provide advantages over conventional manufacturing for alloys such as alloy 625, which is expensive and difficult to machine. Laser powder bed fusion is a type of additive manufacturing that provides advantages but introduces complex effects on mechanical properties in produced components. This work examines some of these effects by assessing laser powder bed fusion processing parameters, several heat treatment schedules, and differing strain rate and temperature testing behavior using mechanical testing. It was determined that the porosity of fabricated samples of alloy 625 could be reduced below the control of 0.43 %, though the hardness does not appear to be sensitive to processing parameters. Heat treatments at higher temperatures appear to maintain a similar hardness to as-printed samples, but a treatment at 670 °C increased the hardness from 28.0 to 31.3 HRC. In compression tests, samples had higher stress/strain ratios in the dynamic range, though they did not fracture in any tests conducted. In a range from 25 to 500 °C, samples displaced a consistent thermal softening effect, suggesting that significant microstructural change may not occur, compatible with the typical high temperature working conditions of the alloy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

21-26

Citation:

Online since:

December 2022

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2022 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Li, R. White, X. Y. Fans, M. Weaver and Y. B. Guo, Microstructure evolution characteristics of Inconel 625 alloy from selective laser melting to heat treatment,, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 705, 20–31 (2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.058

Google Scholar

[2] S.H. Kim, G.H. Shin, B.K. Kim, K.T. Kim, D.Y. Yang, C. Aranas Jr., J.P. Choi, J.H. Yu, Thermo-mechanical improvement of Inconel 718 using ex situ boron nitride-reinforced composites processed by laser powder bed fusion,, Sci. Rep. 7, 14359, (2017).

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14713-1

Google Scholar

[3] K. Chadha, Y. Tian, P. Bocher, J.G. Spray, C. Aranas, Jr. Microstructure Evolution, Mechanical Properties and Deformation Behavior of an Additively Manufactured Maraging Steel,, Materials, 13, 2380, (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/ma13102380

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Tian, R. Palad, C. Aranas Jr., Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of a newly designed steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion,, Addit. Manuf. 36, 101495, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101495

Google Scholar

[5] R. Palad, Y. Tian, K. Chadha, S. Rodrigues, C. Aranas Jr., Microstructural features of novel corrosion-resistant maraging steel manufactured by laser powder bed fusion,, Mater. Lett. 275, 128026, (2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128026

Google Scholar

[6] K. Chadha, Y. Tian, J.G. Spray, C. Aranas, Effect of annealing heat treatment on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of hot isostatic pressed 316L stainless steel fabricated by laser powder bed fusion,, Metals, 10 (6). (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/met10060753

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Tian, C. Zhang, D. Wang, W. Liu, X. Fang, D. Wellmann, Y. Zhao and Y. Tian, A Review on Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Inconel 625 Nickel-Based Alloy,, Applied Sciences, 10(1), 81 (2020).

DOI: 10.3390/app10010081

Google Scholar

[8] J. A. Gonzalez, J. Mireles, S. W. Stafford, M. A. Perez, C. A. Terrazas and R. Wicker, Characterization of Inconel 625 fabricated using powder-bed-based additive manufacturing technologies,, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 264, 200–210 (2019). ImageJ. (2021), https://www.imagej.net/Welcome.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.031

Google Scholar

[9] J. Mittra, S. Banerjee, R. Tewari and G. K. Dey, Fracture behavior of Alloy 625 with different precipitate microstructures,, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 574, 86–93 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.021

Google Scholar