Finite Element Analysis of Failure Pressure of X60 Pipeline with Double Defect

Article Preview

Abstract:

Extensive research on X80 pipeline steel has been conducted, while there is little research on X60 pipeline steel. In this study, FEM (Finite Element Method) on the double defect pipeline model of the outer and inner walls is conducted using ANSYS Workbench software. The research object is the X60 pipeline with rectangular double corrosion defect. Firstly, the stress distribution is examined; Secondly, by changing the geometric factors of the double defects on the outer and inner walls, the influence law on the failure pressure is examined; Finally, based on the FEM results, the failure pressure calculation formula for X60 pipeline with double corrosion defects on the outer and inner walls was fitted by MATLAB software, and whether the fitting formula was accurate and applicable was examined. The stress cloud map of double defect pipeline has two areas: The area near the defect and that far away from the defect, with the former belonging to the danger zone and the latter belonging to the safe zone, Specific to the double defect pipeline model with inner and outer walls, the failure pressure presents a sharp reduction as the defect depth elevates, and its impact on the failure pressure becomes increasingly significant with the narrowing axial distance between the two defects; the increasing defect length increases is related to decreasing failure pressure. In line with the significantly increased defect length, its impact on pipeline failure pressure gradually weakens; the width variation of double defect impacts pipeline failure pressure very slightly; The MATLAB fitting formula possesses a high fitting degree, and the FEM calculation data is basically distributed on the fitting curve, which can better fit the curve of the limit load variation law; The inner wall double defect model performs better in pressure ratio and error analysis. The conclusions drawn have specific reference significance for the safety assessment of oil and gas pipelines.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-131

Citation:

Online since:

October 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.H. Lee, H. Pouraria, J.K. Seo et al., Burst strength behaviour of an aging subsea gas pipeline elbow in different external and internal corrosion-damaged positions. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 7 (3), 435-451(2015).

DOI: 10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0031

Google Scholar

[2] B. Ma, J. Shuai, D. Liu et al., Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects. Eng Fail Anal. 32, 209-219(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.03.015

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Shuai, J. Shuai, K. Xu, Probabilistic analysis of corroded pipelines based on a new failure pressure model. Eng Fail Anal. 81, 216-233(2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.050

Google Scholar

[4] R.S. Motta, H.L.D. Cabral, S.M.B Afonso et al., Comparative studies for failure pressure prediction of corroded pipelines. Eng Fail Anal. 81, 178-192(2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.010

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Chen, X. Li, Y. Chai et al., Assessment of the flexural capacity of corroded steel pipes. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 87 (2), 100-110(2009).

Google Scholar

[6] K.J. Yeom , Y.K. Lee , K.H. Oh et al., Integrity assessment of a corroded API X70 pipe with a single defect by burst pressure analysis. Eng Fail Anal. 57, 553-561(2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.07.024

Google Scholar

[7] H. Ghaednia, S. Das, R. Wang et al., Safe burst strength of a pipeline with dent-crack defect: effect of crack depth and operating pressure. Eng Fail Anal. 55, 288-299(2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.06.005

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Wang, M. Long, X. Li et al., Analysis of interaction between interior and exterior wall corrosion defects. J Mar Sci Eng. 11(3), 502-521(2023).

Google Scholar

[9] X. Zhu, B.N Leis, Theoretical and numerical predictions of burst pressure of pipelines. J PRESS VESS. 129 (4), 644-652(2007).

DOI: 10.1115/1.2767352

Google Scholar

[10] X. Tian, H. Zhang, Failure pressure of medium and high strength pipelines with scratched dent defects. Eng Fail Anal. 78, 29-40(2017).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.03.010

Google Scholar

[11] C.I. Ossai, B. Boswell, I.J. Davies, Pipeline failures in corrosive environments-A conceptual analysis of trends and effects. Eng Fail Anal. 53, 36-58(2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.03.004

Google Scholar

[12] X. Li, Y. Bai, C. Su et al., Effect of interaction between corrosion defects on failure pressure of thin wall steel pipeline. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 138, 8-18(2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.01.002

Google Scholar

[13] J. Gao, P. Yang, X. Li et al., Analytical prediction of failure pressure for pipeline with long corrosion defect. Ocean Eng. 191, 106497 (2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106497

Google Scholar

[14] D.H. Oh , J. Race , S. Oterkus et al., A new methodology for the prediction of burst pressure for API 5L X grade flawless pipelines. Ocean Eng. 212,107602(2020).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107602

Google Scholar

[15] BC. Sérgio, A.N. Theodoro, Analytical solution for stress, strain and plastic instability of pressurized pipes with volumetric flaws. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 89, 187-202(2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.11.002

Google Scholar

[16] C.K. Oh, Y.J. Kim, J.H. Baek et al., Ductile failure analysis of API X65 pipes with notch-type defects using a local fracture criterion. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 84 (8), 512-525(2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.03.002

Google Scholar

[17] M. Staat, Local and global collapse pressure of longitudinally flawed pipes and cylindrical vessels. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 82 (3), 217-225(2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.07.022

Google Scholar

[18] G. Hojjat, S. Shahram, S. Mohamad, A new approach for prediction of the remaining strength of pipeline with external defects. Eng Fail Anal. 130,105754(2021).

Google Scholar

[19] Y. Shuai, X. Zhang, C. Feng et al., A novel model for prediction of burst capacity of corroded pipelines subjected to combined loads of bending moment and axial compression. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 196, 104621(2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104621

Google Scholar

[20] M. Sun, H. Fang, Y. Miao et al., Experimental study on strain and failure location of interacting defects in pipeline. Eng Fail Anal. 148, 107119(2023).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107119

Google Scholar

[21] R. Zhou, X. Gu, S. Bi et al., Finite element analysis of the failure of high-strength steel pipelines containing group corrosion defects. Eng Fail Anal. 136, 106203 (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106203

Google Scholar

[22] H. Wu, H. Zhao, X. Li et al., Elastic-plastic buckling of pipes with asymmetric double corrosion defects subject to external pressure. Ocean Eng. 240, 109975 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109975

Google Scholar

[23] Y. Chen, S. Dong, Z. Zang et al., Collapse failure and capacity of subsea pipelines with complex corrosion defects. Eng Fail Anal. 123, 105266 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105266

Google Scholar

[24] Z. Wang, W. Duan, M. Long et al., Research on Failure Pressure of API 5L X100 Pipeline with Single Defect. Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering. 17 (2), 134-155(2024).

DOI: 10.2174/0124055204294716240306065810

Google Scholar

[25] X. Zhu, B.N. Leis, Evaluation of burst pressure prediction models for line pipes. Int J Pres Ves Pip. 89, 85-97(2011).

Google Scholar

[26] B.C. Mondal, A.S. Dhar, Burst pressure assessment of corroded pipelines using fracture mechanics criterion. Eng Fail Anal. 104, 139-153(2019).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.05.033

Google Scholar

[27] M.S.G. Chiodo, C. Ruggieri, Failure assessments of corroded pipelines with axial defects using stress-based criteria: numerical studies and verification analyses. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 86 (2), 164-176(2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.11.011

Google Scholar

[28] B.C. Mondal, A.S. Dhar, Interaction of multiple corrosion defects on burst pressure of pipelines. Can J Civ Eng. 44 (8), 589-597(2015).

DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2016-0602

Google Scholar

[29] G. Qin, Y. Cheng, Modeling of mechano-electrochemical interaction at a corrosion defect on a suspended gas pipeline and the failure pressure prediction. Thin Wall Struct. 160, 107404 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107404

Google Scholar

[30] J. Wang, Y. Shuai, C. Feng et al., Multi-dimensional mechanical response of multiple longitudinally aligned dents on pipelines and its effect on pipe integrity. Thin Wall Struct. 166, 108020 (2021).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108020

Google Scholar

[31] H. Adib, S. Jallouf, C. Schmit et al., Evaluation of the effect of corrosion defects on the structural integrity of X52 gas pipelines using the SINTAP procedure and notch theory. Int J Press Ves Pip. 84 (3), 123-131(2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.10.005

Google Scholar

[32] M. Allouti, C. Schmitt, G. Pluvinage et al., Study of the influence of dent depth on the critical pressure of pipeline. Eng Fail Anal. 21 (1), 40-51(2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.11.011

Google Scholar

[33] Y. Chen, H. Zhang, J. Zhang et al., Residual bending capacity for pipelines with corrosion defects. J LOSS PREVENT PROC. 32, 70-77(2014).

Google Scholar

[34] Z. Liang, Y. Xiao, J. Zhang, Stress-Strain Analysis of a Pipeline With Inner and Outer Corrosion Defects. J PRESS VESS. 140 (6), 4041434 (2018).

Google Scholar

[35] Z. Chen, S.Yan, H. Ye et al., Effect of the Y/T on the burst pressure for corroded pipelines with high strength. J Petrol Sci Eng. 157,760-766(2017).

Google Scholar