Influence of Filler on the Interfacial Strength between TPE and PP Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of filler type and content on the wettability and interfacial bonding between thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) and polypropylene (PP) by using the injection overmolding process was investigated in this study. Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and talcum (Talc) masterbatchs, ranging from 0 to 40 percent by weight (wt%), were mixed into the PP matrix as fillers. The bond strength of TPE overmolded onto PP composites was characterized by the tensile and tear tests. Good compatibility was observed between TPE and PP filled with various amounts of CaCO3 and Talc. In the case of the tensile test, the crack initiation stress, ultimate tensile strength, strain at break, and bond energy were found to decrease with increasing filler content. The results obtained from the tear test indicated that the propagation strength, ultimate tear strength, strain at break, and bond energy of injection overmolded TPE-PP filled with various CaCO3 contents did not significantly change compared to those obtained from Talc. This can be attributed to the high reinforcing efficiency of Talc in comparison with CaCO3, which can enhance the stiffness and thermal resistance of the PP matrix. As a result, the contact area becomes more resistant to molecular diffusion of TPE chains, particularly at high Talc loadings (30 and 40 wt%), leading to the reduction of interfacial bonding.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

23-31

Citation:

Online since:

February 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] T.A. Osswald, L.S. Turng, P. Graham, Injection Molding Handbook: Special and emerging injection molding processes, second ed., Carl Hanser, Munich 2008.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Rothe, Special injection molding methods, Kunststoffe Plast Europe 87(11) (1997) 1564-1581.

Google Scholar

[3] L.M. Arzondo, N. Pino, J.M. Carella, J.M. Pastor, J.C. Merino, J. Poveda, C. Alonso, Sequential injection overmolding of an elastomeric ethylene-octene copolymer on a polypropylene homopolymer core, Polym. Eng. Sci. 44 (11) (2004) 2110–2116.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.20216

Google Scholar

[4] D. Weng, J. Andries, P. Morin, K. Sauders, J. Politis, Fundamentals and material development for thermoplastic elastomer (TPE) overmolding, J. Injec. Mold. Technol. 4 (1) (2000) 22–28.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Hudacek, How to optimize adhesion in hard-soft over-molding, Plast. Technol. New York, 2004.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Chandran, C.J.G. Plummer, P.E. Bourban, J.A.E. Månson, Morphology and interfacial strength of nonisothermally fusion bonded hard and soft thermoplastics, Polym. Eng. Sci. 58 (2018) 82-92.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.24662

Google Scholar

[7] K. Bruckmoser, K. Resch, T. Kisslinger, T. Lucyshyn, Measurement of inter-diffusion in polymeric materials by applying Raman spectroscopy, Polym. Test. 46 (2015) 122-133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.07.004

Google Scholar

[8] M.V. Candal, A. Gordillo, O.O. Santana, J.J. Sanchez, Study of the adhesion strength on over-molded plastic materials using the essential work of interfacial fracture (EWIF) concept, J. Mater. Sci. 43(15) (2008) 5052-5060.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-008-2667-1

Google Scholar

[9] M. Dondero, J.M. Pastor, J.M. Carella, C.J. Perez, Adhesion control for injection over-molding of polypropylene with elastomeric ethylene copolymers, Polym. Eng. Sci. 49(10) (2009) 1886-1893.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.21415

Google Scholar

[10] S. Nguyen, C.J. Perez, M. Desimone, J.M. Pastor, J.P. Tomba, J.M. Carella, Adhesion control for injection overmolding of elastomeric propylene copolymers on polypropylene: effects of block and random microstructures, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 46 (2013) 44-55.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.016

Google Scholar

[11] M. Bastian, C. Deubel, M. Leistner, S. Zepnik, Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe 70 (2017) 26-31.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Islam, H.N. Hansen, M. Bondo, Experimental investigation of the factors influencing the polymer–polymer bond strength during two-component injection moulding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 50(1-4) (2010) 101-111.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2507-8

Google Scholar

[13] A. Frick, M. Spadaro, Process influences on the materials interface of an injection molded hard-soft-component, Macromol. Symp. 378 (2018) 1–8.

DOI: 10.1002/masy.201600119

Google Scholar

[14] A.-M.M.R. Persson, E.L. Hinrichsen, E. Andreassen, Adhesion between thermoplastic elastomers and polyamide-12 with different glass fiber fractions in two-component injection molding, Polym. Eng. & Sci. 60 (2020) 1642-1661.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.25408

Google Scholar

[15] M. Tasdemir, S. Ersoy, Mechanical, morphological and thermal properties of HDPE polymer composites filled with talc, calcium carbonate and glass spheres, Romanian J. Mater. 45 (2015) 147-154.

Google Scholar

[16] B. Weindenfeller, M. Höfer, and M. Schilling, Thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and specific heat capacity of particle filled polypropylene, Compos. Part A. 35 (2004) 423–429.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.11.005

Google Scholar