Develop a Tool for Democratising Knowledge within Small and Medium Enterprises in Simulations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Given the growing importance of simulation in engineering and its increasing adoption by SMEs, it's crucial to find ways for these smaller enterprises to use simulation tools efficiently, despite having fewer experts than larger organizations. After reviewing literature on how knowledge-based engineering can involve non-expert users and examining simulation workflows. A system has been proposed that will allow non users to conduct certain FEA analysis. This system enables non-expert users to adjust parameters within templates created by a simulation expert. It was found that the system could produce results that were very similar to the results of the expert users initial analysis.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

115-125

Citation:

Online since:

January 2026

Export:

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Throp, E. (2024, 11-12 June 2024). Simulation Deployment the MDLZ journey NAFEMS UK Coneference 2024, Staffordshire.

Google Scholar

[2] Kügler, P., Dworschak, F., Schleich, B., & Wartzack, S. (2023). The evolution of knowledge-based engineering from a design research perspective: Literature review 2012–2021. Advanced engineering informatics, 55, 101892

DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2023.101892

Google Scholar

[3] Baikerikar, P., & Turner, C. J. (2021). Comparison of FEA simulations and experimental results for as-built additively manufactured dogbone specimens. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 115(9), 2839-2851

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07307-9

Google Scholar

[4] Sippola, R. (2023). Knowledge management in an SME: knowledge management as a tool to alleviate vulnerabilities to knowledge losses in the case of a small high-tech enterprise.

Google Scholar

[5] Thomas, A. (2024). Digitally transforming the organization through knowledge management: a socio-technical system (STS) perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 437-460

DOI: 10.1108/ejim-02-2024-0114

Google Scholar

[6] Cocca, P., Schiuma, G., Viscardi, M., & Floreani, F. (2022). Knowledge management system requirements to support Engineering-To-Order manufacturing of SMEs. Knowledge management research & practice, 20(6), 814-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238. 2021.1939174

DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2021.1939174

Google Scholar

[7] Olalekan, E., Awolaja, A. M., & Otulana, O. K. (2023). Knowledge Retention Strategy and Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Ado-Ekiti Metropolis. International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, 4(3), 203-211

DOI: 10.47747/ijbme.v4i3.1152

Google Scholar

[8] Rusjan, B., & Ali, M. (2010). Capitalising on ISO 9001 benefits for strategic results. The International journal of quality & reliability management, 27(7), 756-778

DOI: 10.1108/02656711011062372

Google Scholar

[9] Zivaljevic, A., Zakic, K., & Bevanda, V. (2022). What would QMS implementation really bring to a company?‐ Theoretical review on benefits and disadvantages researched in practice. Journal of organizational change management, 35(6), 805-845

DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-03-2020-0070

Google Scholar

[10] Schweigert-Recksiek, S., & Lindemann, U. (2018, 2018). Improvement opportunities for the collaboration of design and simulation departments - An interview study

DOI: 10.21278/idc.2018.0393

Google Scholar

[11] Schweigert-Recksiek, S., & Lindemann, U. (2020). CHOOSING THE RIGHT MEASURES TO IMPROVE COLLABORATION BETWEEN DESIGN AND SIMULATION DEPARTMENTS. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 727-736

DOI: 10.1017/dsd.2020.57

Google Scholar

[12] Schweigert-Recksiek, S., Hagenow, N., & Lindemann, U. (2021, 2021). Evaluation of improvement opportunities for the collaboration of design and simulation - An industrial multi-method study. Cambridge

DOI: 10.1017/pds.2021.142

Google Scholar

[13] Tickel, B. (2025, 19-22 May). Democratization, Upfront Simulation and the Role of the Simulation Expert NAFEMS World Congress 2025, Salzburg, Austria.

Google Scholar

[14] Spencer, N.A. (2023). Finite Element Analysis System Workflow Tools

DOI: 10.2172/2430168

Google Scholar

[15] Uhrmacher, A. M., Frazier, P., Hähnle, R., Klügl, F., Lorig, F., Ludäscher, B., Nenzi, L., Ruiz-Martin, C., Rumpe, B., & Szabo, C. (2024). Context, Composition, Automation, and Communication: The C2AC Roadmap for Modeling and Simulation. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 34(4), 1-51

DOI: 10.1145/3673226

Google Scholar

[16] Zhu, Z., Chen, M., Qian, Z., Li, H., Wu, K., Ma, Z., Wen, Y., Yue, S., & Lü, G. (2023). Documentation strategy for facilitating the reproducibility of geo-simulation experiments. Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 163, 105687

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105687

Google Scholar

[17] Hudson, S., Reed, Z., & Singh, R. (2023, 15-18 May 2023). Implementing Democratized Structural Simulation NAFEMS World Congress 2023, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Google Scholar

[18] Simcenter 3D. (n.d.). Siemens Digital Industries Software. https://plm.sw.siemens.com/en-US/simcenter/mechanical-simulation/simcenter-3d/

DOI: 10.3139/9783446474512.004

Google Scholar