Comparison of Artificial Stone Made from Sludge Stone with Travertine Stone Waste of Stone Cutting Factory

Article Preview

Abstract:

Using from Stone factory waste was obtained a high-quality artificial stone. The basis of these stones is factory waste; i. Sludge stone cutting factory (SSCF) and ii. The pure waste of travertine stone (WTS).Basic formulation of artificial stone is SSCF or WTS, 50 wt.% of sludge stone is cement, 12 wt.% of cement is unsaturated polyester resin (UPR), 25 wt.% is water, 7 wt.% is the filler consists of micro-silica and different amounts of TiO2-NP. Artificial stones production with this method than to natural stone are pressure-resistant, highly flexible, resistant to freezing and scrapes, lightweight, ability to cut and form the low thickness and is self-cleaning.Artificial stones made of SSCF in all mechanical properties are better than WTS, because the density of the SSCF is much greater than the powder prepared from WST and SSCF is all wastewater leaving the factory after cutting various types of decorative stones. As well as for preparation of artificial stone from WTS should be done once milled and powdered waste, this step increases the cost of them.Keywords: Artificial stone; Sludge stone cutting factory (SSCF); Waste of travertine stone (WTS); Nanoparticles of TiO2; Cement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Pages:

64-71

Citation:

Online since:

April 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Iran stone quarrying industry andGATT: Iran exports and imports. http: /www. rockstone. biz/iran-stone. php.

Google Scholar

[2] Mosaferi, M. Dianat, I. Khatibi, M.S. Nemati Mansour, S. Fahiminia, M and Asl Hashem, A. Review of environmental aspects and waste management of stonecutting and fabrication industries. Journal of Material Cycles and waste Management. 16(4), (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s10163-013-0193-y

Google Scholar

[3] Mosaferi, M. Fahiminia, M. Taghipour, S. Environmental management of the solids wastes of stone cutting industries: a case study of Qom province. J Environ Sci Technol. 9(2), (2007), 65-73.

Google Scholar

[4] Yarmohamadi Samani, H. Yarahmadi Bafghi, A.R. Prediction of the sawing quality of Marmarit stones using the capability of artificial neural network. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. 36(7), (2012).

DOI: 10.1002/nag.1033

Google Scholar

[5] Mbuligwe E. S, Kaseva, E.M. Assessment of industrial solid waste management and resource recovery practices in Tanzania. Resour Conserv Recy. 47, (2006), 260–276.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.11.002

Google Scholar

[6] Fahiminia, M. Ardani, R. Hashemi, S. Alizadeh, M. Wastewater Treatment of Stone Cutting Industries by Coagulation Process. Arch Hyg Sci. 2(1), (2013), 16-22.

Google Scholar

[7] Bianchini, G. Marrocchino, E. Tassinari, R. and Vaccaro. Recycling ofconstruction and demolition waste materials: a chemical- mineralogical appraisal. Waste Management. 25(2), (2005), 149-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.09.005

Google Scholar

[8] Alzboon, K. and Mahasneh, K.N. Effect of Using Stone Cutting Waste on the Compression Strength and Slump Characteristics of Concrete. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 3, (2009) 03-27.

Google Scholar

[9] Pentecost, A. Travertine, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, (2005). ISBN 1-4020-3523-3.

Google Scholar

[10] LEA,F.M. The chemistry of cement and concrete(London, Arnold, 1970).

Google Scholar

[11] ACI COMMITTEE 211. 1-91.

Google Scholar

[12] CONCRETE SOCIETY, Concrete core testing for strength, Technical Report. No. 11, p.44 (London, 1976).

Google Scholar

[13] BS EN 14617-2: 2008, Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 2: Determination of flexural strength (bending).

DOI: 10.3403/03218452u

Google Scholar

[14] EN 12372: 2007, Natural stone test methods - Determination of flexural strength under concentrated load.

DOI: 10.3403/30403938

Google Scholar

[15] EN 14618: 2009, Agglomerated stone- Terminology and classification.

Google Scholar

[16] EN 14617-16, Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Determination of dimensions, geometric characteristics and surface quality of modular tiles.

DOI: 10.3403/03248631u

Google Scholar

[17] BS EN 14617-1: 2005, Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 1: Determination of Apparent Density and Water Absorption.

DOI: 10.3403/03245546

Google Scholar

[18] BS EN 14617-4: 2012, Agglomerated stone - Test methods - Part 4: Determination of the abrasion resistance.

Google Scholar

[19] ISO 8486-1: 1996, Bonded abrasives - Determination and designation of grain size distribution - Part 1: Macrogrits F4 to F220.

DOI: 10.3403/00949626u

Google Scholar

[20] BS EN 16140: 2011, Natural stone test methods. Determination of sensitivity to changes in appearance produced by thermal cycles.

DOI: 10.3403/30228471u

Google Scholar