Exploring the Influence of Variations in Distance Levels to Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma on Surface Energy and Fluorescence Modifications in Shape-Stable Aluminum Alloys and Shape-Instable Unvulcanized Rubber Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing demand for advanced materials with enhanced surface properties has driven significant research into various surface modification techniques. Among these, plasma treatment emerges as a versatile and effective method for improving the characteristics of different materials [1-10]. Plasma technology offers unique benefits, such as the ability to modify surfaces without the need for harsh chemicals or excessive energy inputs. This study focuses on two specific materials: Aluminum alloy 2024, recognized for its high strength-to-weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance, and widespread application in aerospace and automotive industries, and unvulcanized rubber compounds, which provide flexibility and resilience essential for various applications, including seals and gaskets. Utilizing dielectric barrier discharge (DCSBD) technology for surface modification presents a novel approach to activating and cleaning the surfaces of these materials [11,12]. DCSBD plasma operates at atmospheric pressure, making it a cost-effective alternative to traditional cleaning and activation methods that often rely on corrosive chemicals or mechanical abrasion. The versatility of DCSBD plasma allows for fine-tuning of various parameters, such as voltage, treatment time, and gas composition, enabling tailored modifications to achieve desired surface properties. This research aims to investigate the effects of plasma application on Aluminum alloy 2024, particularly in terms of enhancing surface energy and wettability. Increasing surface energy is critical for improving adhesion properties, particularly for applications that involve coating or bonding processes [13]. The plasma treatment process results in enhanced surface energy, significantly reducing the contact angle of testing liquids on treated surfaces compared to their untreated counterparts. This enhanced wettability can lead to improved adhesive bonding and overall performance of coated or bonded materials [14-17]. The study evaluates how variations in treatment parameters such as voltage, exposure time, and airflow rate affect the surface properties of both materials. Furthermore, the impact of varying distances between the plasma source and the treated surfaces is examined, as this distance significantly influences the efficacy of the surface modification process. Understanding the relationship between these variables is essential for optimizing plasma treatment conditions. Previous studies have highlighted the potential of plasma treatment to improve the adhesion of coatings to Aluminum alloy 2024 [18-20]. This research asserts that atmospheric pressure plasmas provide a compelling alternative to conventional surface preparation techniques, such as acid etching or mechanical abrasion, which can be harmful to both the environment and the materials being treated. Moreover, the comparative surface modification effects on the two distinct materials: shape-stable Aluminum alloy 2024 and shape-unstable unvulcanized rubber offer valuable insights into the plasma treatment process. The findings from this research are expected to elucidate the intricate relationship between plasma treatment parameters and the resulting surface characteristics. By systematically varying the distance between the plasma source and the material surfaces, this study aims to identify optimal conditions for effective surface modification. Ultimately, this research contributes to a better understanding of plasma technology's capabilities, paving the way for enhanced applications across various industries. Experimental data suggest that the plasma process significantly reduces contaminants and enhances the alloy’s wettability. Another study examined how plasma treatment can improve the adhesion of paint films by pre-treating Aluminum 2024 surfaces. To improve adhesive bonding on Aluminum 2024, further research demonstrated that atmospheric-pressure plasmas offer a viable alternative to acid treatments or abrasive techniques for preparing surfaces before bonding [18]. Exposure times for Aluminum 2024 surfaces differ based on the plasma-generating device; one study applied exposure times from 1 to 10 seconds at 330 [W] using a DCSBD system [21]. Another essential factor in plasma-based surface modification is the material-to-plasma distance, as seen in research where wood surfaces were exposed to plasma for 10 seconds with spacers to control the separation distance at 0.15 [mm], 0.45 [mm], and 1 [mm] [22]. Comparable studies using DCSBD plasma technology at 400 W applied exposure times from 5 to 60 seconds, under varying atmospheric gases such as O₂, CO₂, N₂, and Ar, with separation distances from 0.1 to 0.2 [mm] [23]. This work aims to investigate the potential of DCSBD plasma to treat flat materials, specifically Aluminum 2024 alloy and unvulcanized rubber compound (UnRB). The study seeks to compare plasma’s surface modification effects on shape-stable (AA2024) and shape-unstable (UnRB) flat materials. Prior studies have shown that adjusting the distance between the plasma source and the surface significantly impacts surface energy and cleanliness. Here, we focus on evaluating how distance influences the effectiveness of plasma surface modification on AA2024 and UnRB, aiming to determine the maximum distance at which effective surface modification can be achieved. Evidence of plasma efficacy includes a notable increase in surface energy and fluorescence changes, clear indicators of the plasma’s cleaning effect. Given that UnRB is less dimensionally stable than aluminum alloy, comparing these materials at varying distances from the plasma source offers fresh insights into how different surfaces respond to plasma treatment. The findings simulate conditions where materials are at various distances from the plasma-generating ceramic dielectric, providing deeper understanding of plasma’s cleaning and energy effects on different surface types.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

41-56

Citation:

Online since:

June 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Primc, M. Mozetič, Surface modification of polymers by plasma treatment for appropriate adhesion of coatings, Materials 17 (2024) 1494.

DOI: 10.3390/ma17071494

Google Scholar

[2] G. Chahine, U. Marathe, L. Collins, V. Thomas, V. Kumar, A.A. Hassen, ... & U. Vaidya, Effect of plasma treatment on LMPAEK/CF tape and composites manufactured by automated tape placement (ATP), Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 108540 (2024).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108540

Google Scholar

[3] S. Bayki, S. Mujumdar, Enhancing wetting and adhesion of stainless steel (SS304) surfaces with dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma jet treatment, Appl. Surf. Sci. 161515 (2024).

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161515

Google Scholar

[4] J. Wang, S. Yang, C. Xiao, Z. Yu, R. Ren, X. Xiong, Effects of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment and its aging behaviors on interfacial strength of PI/PEEK composite film, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. E56369 (2024).

DOI: 10.1002/app.56369

Google Scholar

[5] R. Janík, M. Kohutiar, P. Skalková, M. Pajtášová, I. Labaj, J. Šulcová, J. Dobrovská, Modification process of selected thermoplastics with cold plasma and evaluation of changes in their properties, Mater. Wiss. Werkst. 54 (2023) 401-414.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.202200278

Google Scholar

[6] 6. R. Janík, V. Vargová, J. Šulcová, M. Pajtášová, Modification of the glass surface by DCSBD plasma discharge to improve adhesion of decorative gold, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1199 (2021) 012048.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/1199/1/012048

Google Scholar

[7] P. Vinduska, J. Janik, D. Buc, Investigation of conditions for preparation of oriented nanotubes at department of microelectronics in a modified plasma-enhanced hot filament chemical vapor deposition reactor, Physica E: Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostruct. 40 (2008) 2247-2251.

DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2007.10.099

Google Scholar

[8] R. Janík, V. Vargová, M. Kohutiar, M. Krbata, K. Moricová, The capability of diffuse coplanar surface barrier plasma to effectively remove contaminants from surfaces of various materials, Mater. Wiss. Werkst. 55 (2024) 656-664.

DOI: 10.1002/mawe.202400024

Google Scholar

[9] D. Skácelová, V. Danilov, J. Schäfer, A. Quade, P. Sťahel, M. Černák, J. Meichsner, Room temperature plasma oxidation in DCSBD: A new method for preparation of silicon dioxide films at atmospheric pressure, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 178 (2013) 651-655.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2012.10.017

Google Scholar

[10] J. Šulcová, I. Papučová, R. Janík, Glass surface modification using diffusion coplanar surface barrier discharge (DCSBD), IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 776 (2020) 012105.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/776/1/012105

Google Scholar

[11] M. Iqbal, D.K. Dinh, Q. Abbas, M. Imran, H. Sattar, A. Ul Ahmad, Controlled surface wettability by plasma polymer surface modification, Surfaces 2 (2019) 349-371.

DOI: 10.3390/surfaces2020026

Google Scholar

[12] C. Ma, A. Nikiforov, D. Hegemann, N. De Geyter, R. Morent, K. Ostrikov, Plasma-controlled surface wettability: Recent advances and future applications, Int. Mater. Rev. 68 (2023) 82-119.

DOI: 10.1080/09506608.2022.2047420

Google Scholar

[13] J. Chai, F. Lu, B. Li, D.Y. Kwok, Wettability interpretation of oxygen plasma modified poly (methyl methacrylate), Langmuir 20 (2004) 10919-10927.

DOI: 10.1021/la048947s

Google Scholar

[14] D. Caschera, A. Mezzi, L. Cerri, T. de Caro, C. Riccucci, G.M. Ingo, ... & B. Cortese, Effects of plasma treatments for improving extreme wettability behavior of cotton fabrics, Cellulose 21 (2014) 741-756.

DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0123-0

Google Scholar

[15] T.S. Williams, H. Yu, R.F. Hicks, Atmospheric pressure plasma activation as a surface pre-treatment for the adhesive bonding of aluminum 2024, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 28 (2014) 653-674.

DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2013.859646

Google Scholar

[16] L. Sorrentino, L. Carrino, 2024 aluminium alloy wettability and superficial cleaning improvement by air cold plasma treatment, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009) 1400-1409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.061

Google Scholar

[17] W. Polini, L. Sorrentino, Improving the wettability of 2024 aluminium alloy by means of cold plasma treatment, Appl. Surf. Sci. 214 (2003) 232-242.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00359-3

Google Scholar

[18] L. Bónová, A. Zahoranová, D. Kováčik, M. Zahoran, M. Mičušík, M. Černák, Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of flat aluminum surface, Appl. Surf. Sci. 331 (2015) 79-86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.030

Google Scholar

[19] R. Talviste, O. Galmiz, M. Stupavská, J. Ráhel', Effect of DCSBD plasma treatment distance on surface characteristics of wood and thermally modified wood, Wood Sci. Technol. 54 (2020) 651-665.

DOI: 10.1007/s00226-020-01175-4

Google Scholar

[20] R. Talviste, O. Galmiz, M. Stupavská, Z. Tuceková, K. Kaarna, D. Kovácik, Effect of DCSBD plasma treatment on surface properties of thermally modified wood, Surf. Interfaces 16 (2019) 8-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.04.005

Google Scholar

[21] M.O. King, M.T. Staff, A.L. White, M. Kopec, M. Stapleton, S.J. Hinder, J.F. Watts, UV fluorescence as a method of high throughput surface cleanliness assessment: A comparison with XPS, Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives 104 (2021) 102739.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102739

Google Scholar

[22] N. Bachurová, J. Kudláček, S. Legutko, Effect of Material and Pretreatments on Surface Cleanliness, in: International Scientific-Technical Conference MANUFACTURING, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024, pp.174-183.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-56467-3_14

Google Scholar

[23] S. Ďurišová, M. Pajtášová, R. Janík, D. Ondrušová, I. Labaj, S. Božeková, ... & S. Brigantová, Diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge assisted surface modification of un-vulcanized skim rubber blend, in: AIP Conference Proceedings 2976 (2023).

DOI: 10.1063/5.0173773

Google Scholar

[24] S. Ďurišová, M. Pajtášová, D. Ondrušová, R. Janík, S. Lokšíková, S. Božeková, ... & T. Klepka, Diffuse plasma surface modification of natural rubber-based composite: Rapid communication, Polimery 69 (2024) 450-453.

DOI: 10.14314/polimery.2024.7.7

Google Scholar

[25] R. Janík, M. Kohutiar, A. Dubec, M. Eckert, K. Moricová, M. Pajtášová, ... & M. Krbata, DMA analysis of plasma modified PVC films and the nature of initiated surface changes, Materials 15 (2022) 4658.

DOI: 10.3390/ma15134658

Google Scholar

[26] M. Odrášková, J. Ráhel', A. Zahoranová, R. Tiňo, M. Černák, Plasma activation of wood surface by diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 28 (2008) 203-211.

DOI: 10.1007/s11090-007-9117-8

Google Scholar

[27] J. Hanusová, D. Kováčik, M. Stupavská, M. Černák, I. Novák, Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of polyamide-12 foils, Open Chem. 13 (2015) 000010151520150049.

DOI: 10.1515/chem-2015-0049

Google Scholar

[28] B. Hergelová, A. Zahoranová, D. Kováčik, M. Stupavská, M. Černák, Polylactic acid surface activation by atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma, Open Chem.

DOI: 10.1515/chem-2015-0067

Google Scholar

[29] A. Buček, A. Brablec, D. Kováčik, P. Sťahel, M. Černák, Glass bond adhesive strength improvement by DCSBD atmospheric-pressure plasma treatment, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 78 (2017) 1-3.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.06.017

Google Scholar

[30] V. Štěpánová, P. Šrámková, S. Sihelník, M. Stupavská, J. Jurmanová, D. Kováčik, The effect of ambient air plasma generated by coplanar and volume dielectric barrier discharge on the surface characteristics of polyamide foils, Vacuum 183 (2021) 109887.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109887

Google Scholar

[31] R. Tino, L. Smatko, Modifying wood surfaces with atmospheric diffuse coplanar surface barrier discharge plasma, Wood and Fiber Science 46 (2014) 459-464.

Google Scholar