The Design of KSITS Steel Modular Growing House as a Development of Local Steel Technology Downstream Industries in the Future

Article Preview

Abstract:

The application of modular systems is one of the new technologies worth considering. The modular system is a prefabricated steel structure where the floor decks, columns, beams, and walls are fabricated along with the utility system, mechanical-electrical, and finishing in one modular. The benefits of this system are constructability, positive aspects towards schedule, fewer on and off-site workers, quality and productivity aspects, and proper tests. A total solution is needed in the form of steel-based construction modular growing houses to support the National Development Program. Joint research is needed between Universities and Local Industries to produce technological innovations with high Domestic Component Levels in implementing the use of materials and steel manufacturing processes. The Krakatau Steel-Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (KSITS) Steel Modular Growing House Design is a steel-based construction that supports in a fast, precise, quality manner; and becomes a contributor in absorbing various locally produced steel products. From the analytical study and modeling of steel modular, the results showed that KSITS Steel Modular Growing House Design has fulfilled the requirements of structural and connection strength, serviceability control, management construction procedures, economical engineering, and manufacturing design in operational planning for the short-term and development of local steel technology downstream industries in the future. The results showed minor differences in ratios, with WF steel slightly surpassing HSS steel. HSS steel stands out due to its significantly lighter weight compared to WF steel, impacting structural dynamics and feasibility in modular house construction. This indicates that the moment capacity of HSS is lower than the moment capacity of WF. However, from the results of running, it is found that the criteria are the same, all components other than the beam, do not experience yielding prior to yielding in the beam. It means that the connection works properly according to the criteria.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

137-151

Citation:

Online since:

October 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kim J. In, Development of modular building systems made of innovative steel sections and wall configurations. Queensland University of Technology (2019).

DOI: 10.5204/thesis.eprints.127327

Google Scholar

[2] Navaratnam S., Ngo T., Gunawardena T., Henderson D., Performance review of prefabricated building systems and future research in Australia. Buildings (2019).

DOI: 10.3390/buildings9020038

Google Scholar

[3] Gorgolewski M.T., Grubb P.J., Lawson R.M., Design of residential buildings (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Z., Liu J., Yu Y., Zhou C., Yan R., Experimental study of an innovative modular steel building connection. J Constructional Steel Research (2017) 69–82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.008

Google Scholar

[5] Deng E.F., Zong L., Ding Y., Luo Y.B., Seismic behavior and design of cruciform bolted module-to-module connection with various reinforcing details. Thin-Walled Structures (2018) 106–119.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.033

Google Scholar

[6] Annan C.D., Youssef M.A., Naggar M.H.E., Assessment of overstrength and ductility of a four-story modular steel building braced frame (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Limit states design of steel structures; standard CAN/CSAS16.1- 01 (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Sanches, O. Mercan, and B. Roberts, Experimental investigations of vertical post-tensioned connection for modular steel structures, Engineering Structures, (2018) vol. 175, 776–789.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.049

Google Scholar

[9] W. K. Yu, K. F. Chung, and S. L. Chan, Structural instability of multi-story door-type modular steel scaffolds, Engineering Structures, (2004) vol. 26, 867–881.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.02.006

Google Scholar

[10] C. D. Annan, M. A. Youssef, and M. H. Ei Naggar, Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of modular steel-braced frames, Engineering Structures, (2009) vol. 31, 1435–1446.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.024

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Yu and Z. Chen, Rigidity of corrugated plate sidewalls and its effect on the modular structural design, Engineering Structures, (2018) vol. 175, 191–200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.039

Google Scholar

[12] S. G. Hong, B. H. Cho, K. S. Chung, and J. H. Moon, Behavior of framed modular building system with double skin steel panels, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, (2011) vol. 67, 936–946.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.02.002

Google Scholar

[13] C. Gong, D. Sun, Q. Chen. Y. Zhu, M. Shang, and F. Liu, Seismic Performance of Modular Structures with Novel Steel Frame: Light Gauge Slotted Steel Stud Walls. Shock and Vibration, (2022) vol. 2022, 1-8.

DOI: 10.1155/2022/6926657

Google Scholar

[14] H. Rajanayagam, K. Poologanathan, P. Gatheeshgar, G. E. Varelis, P. Sherlock, B. Nagaratnam, P. Hackney, A-State-Of-The-Art review on modular building connections. Structures, (2021) vol. 34, 1903-1922.

DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.08.114

Google Scholar

[15] J. Hwan Doh, N. M. Ho, D. Miller, T. Peters, D. Carlson, and P. Lai, Steel Bracket Connection on Modular Buildings, Journal of Steel Structures Construction, (2017).

DOI: 10.4172/2472-0437.1000121

Google Scholar

[16] T. Gunawardena, Behaviour of Prefabricated Modular Buildings Subjected to Lateral Loads, (2016).

Google Scholar

[17] J. Dhanapal, H. Ghaednia, S. Das, and J. Velocci, Structural performance of stateof-the-art VectorBloc modular connector under axial loads, Engineering Structures, (2019), vol. 183, 496–509.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.023

Google Scholar

[18] Choi Kyung-Suk, Lee Ho-Chan, Kim Hyung-Joon. Influence of Analytical Models on the Seismic Response of Modular Structures. J. Korea Inst. Struct. Maint. Insp. (2016) 74–85.

Google Scholar

[19] Yu Y., Chen Z., Rigidity of corrugated plate sidewalls and its effect on the modular structural design. Eng. Struct. (2018) 191–200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.039

Google Scholar