Internal Failure Detection in Laminated Rubber Bearing Using Deep Learning Techniques

Article Preview

Abstract:

Automating failure detection of infrastructure is essential to avoid unexpected downtime, which could impact both operations and user safety. However, frequent replacement of laminated rubber bearing (LRB) as a vital seismic isolation component can be inefficient and inspecting them for faults is often labor-intensive. This is a significant challenge in maintaining structural integrity, especially in critical infrastructure where continuous monitoring is necessary. Recent innovation in deep learning (DL) provides a promising alternative to traditional inspection methods, offering more efficient and accurate assessments. Hence, this paper explores the practical application of DL for detecting internal failure in laminated rubber bearings installed in structures. Neural network models, including a convolutional neural network (CNN), long-short term memory (LSTM), and their combinations (hybrid CNN-LSTM), were employed. An experimental setup was developed to simulate a bridge structure supported by down-scale LRB samples at its base. Samples with internal debonding failure were manufactured by reducing the bonding adhesive, to replicate failure conditions due to shear loading where the LRBs were forced to slide in an extreme condition. The vibration platform was actuated under different levels of frequency. Both Healthy and Faulty LRB conditions data were collected for 10 minutes each, which is adequate for 10 sets of data divided into training, validation, and testing with a fixed 6:2:2 ratio, respectively. Results revealed that CNN outperformed the other two models in average classification accuracy at 5Hz and 10Hz with 97.65% and 91.45%, respectively. Plus, CNN recorded the shortest training period among all models compared, with only 128 seconds at 15Hz, compared to 695 seconds and 1599 seconds owned by LSTM and hybrid CNN-LSTM respectively. In conclusion, neural networks have shown the capability in identifying LRB internal failure. CNN has the advantage in terms of both classification accuracy and training period compared to LSTM and hybrid CNN-LSTM models.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

141-147

Citation:

Online since:

November 2025

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2025 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.M. Adam, F. Parisi, J. Sagaseta, X. Lu, Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century, Engineering Structures,173, p.122–149 (2018).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082

Google Scholar

[2] L. Björklund, Dynamic Analysis of a Railway Bridges Subjected to High Speed Trains (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Guo, T. Yang, W. Gao, C. Zhang, A novel fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery based on a convolutional neural network. Sensors (Switzerland), 18(5) (2018).

DOI: 10.3390/s18051429

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Zeng, Z. He, P. Pan, A deep learning method to monitor axial pressure and shear deformation of rubber bearings under coupled compression and shear loading, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 52(11) 3304–3321 (2023).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3895

Google Scholar

[5] C. Zhang, A.A. Mousavi, S.F. Masri, G. Gholipour, K. Yan, X. Li, Vibration feature extraction using signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 177 (2022).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109175

Google Scholar

[6] Xiang, N., Goto, Y., Alam, M. S., & Li, J. (2021). Effect of bonding or unbonding on seismic behavior of bridge elastomeric bearings: lessons learned from past earthquakes in China and Japan and inspirations for future design. In Advances in Bridge Engineering, 2(1).

DOI: 10.1186/s43251-021-00036-9

Google Scholar

[7] Ali, A., Sandhu, T. Y., & Usman, M. (2019). Ambient vibration testing of a pedestrian bridge using low-cost accelerometers for shm applications. Smart Cities, 2(1), 20–30.

DOI: 10.3390/smartcities2010002

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang, C., Mousavi, A. A., Masri, S. F., Gholipour, G., Yan, K., & Li, X. (2022). Vibration feature extraction using signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review. In Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,177.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109175

Google Scholar

[9] H.Y. Chen, C.H. Lee, Deep Learning Approach for Vibration Signals Applications Sensors 21(11) 3929 (2021)

Google Scholar

[10] H. Li, T. Wang, G. Wu, A Bayesian deep learning approach for random vibration analysis of bridges subjected to vehicle dynamic interaction, Mech. Syst. Signal Process 170, 108799 (2022)

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108799

Google Scholar

[11] Y. T. Wu, R.R. Stewart, Attenuating coherent environmental noise in seismic data via the U-net method. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11 (2023).

DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1082435

Google Scholar

[12] P. Xie, L. Zhang,M. Li,S.F.S. Lau,J. Huang,Elevator vibration signal denoising by deep residual U-Net. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 225, (2024).

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113976

Google Scholar

[13] X.J. Soo, Z. Adnan, J.H. Ho, A.B. Chai, H.C. How, T.Y. Chai, S. Kamaruddin, Crack Detection of Rubber Mount through Deep Learning Models in Structural Health Monitoring System, in IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 1453 (012035) (2025).

DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1453/1/012035

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Cheng, W. Liao, X. Chen,X. Lu, A Vibration Recognition Method Based on Deep Learning and Signal Processing, Eng. Mech. 38(4), 230 (2021).

Google Scholar