Sensitivity Analysis and Calibration of the Heat Source in Additive Manufacturing of AlNiCo Magnets

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an initial investigation into the numerical modeling of additive manufacturing processes for AlNiCo magnets. The research concentrated on calibrating the heat source parameters by utilizing previously published experimental results. The influence of laser power and scanning speed on the laser fusion of AlNiCo5 on SS 304 substrates was investigated through single track experiments. The geometries of the melt pools were measured and utilized as the foundation for model calibration. A two-step calibration methodology was adopted: (1) a simplified 2D model implemented in Octave was used for sensitivity analysis and parameter fitting; and (2) validation was performed using a 3D model within the commercial software Simufact Welding software. Parameters calibrated through 2D simulations could be directly transferred to the 3D context. However, while the calibration procedure enabled accurate fitting for individual tracks, it resulted in globally non-optimal parameters, suggesting that process parameters influence laser penetration depth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

243-249

Online since:

April 2026

Export:

Share:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. Gargalis, L. Karavias, A. Argyrou, E.K. Karaxi, E.P. Koumoulos, Additive Manufacturing of AlNiCo5 Hard Magnetic Alloy Through Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A Single Scan Track Study of Microstructure and Nanomechanical Integrity, Appl. Sci. 15(23) (2025).

DOI: 10.3390/app152312522

Google Scholar

[2] J. Goldak, A. Chakravarti, M. Bibby, A new finite element model for welding heat sources, Metallurgical Transactions B, Vol. 15B, 299-305, 1984.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02667333

Google Scholar

[3] M. Kusano, M. Watanabe, Heat Source Model Development for Thermal Analysis of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Bayesian Optimization and Machine Learning, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation (2024) 13:288–304.

DOI: 10.1007/s40192-023-00334-2

Google Scholar

[4] J.W. Eaton, D. Bateman, and S. Hauberg, R. Wehbring, GNU Octave version 9.2.0 manual: a high-level interactive language for numerical computations (2024), https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/v9.2.0.

Google Scholar

[5] V.D. Fachinotti, A.A Anca, A. Cardona, Analytical solutions of the thermal field induced by moving double-ellipsoidal and double-elliptical heat sources in a semi-infinite body. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 27 (2011) 595–607.

DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1324

Google Scholar

[6] V.D. Fachinotti, A. Cardona, B. Baufeld, O. Van der Biest. Finite-element modelling of heat transfer in shaped metal deposition and experimental validation. Acta Materialia 60 (2012) 6621–6630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.031

Google Scholar

[7] J. Bect, E. Vazquez. STK: a Small (Matlab/Octave) Toolbox for Kriging. Release 2.8.1 (2023). https://github.com/stk-kriging/stk.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Morris, T.J. Mitchell. Exploratory designs for computational experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 43 (1995) 381–402.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-t

Google Scholar

[9] D.C. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 9th Edition, Wiley (2020).

Google Scholar

[10] G. Ertugrul, A. Hälsig, R. Rimpl, J. Hensel, S. Härtel, Artificial neural network based calibration of Goldak heat source parameters in tandem plasma transferred arc process using finite element analysis, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 139 (2025), 2349-2363.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-025-15843-x

Google Scholar