Measurement of Forces Generated during Robotized Additive Manufacturing Process Using Pellet Extruder

Article Preview

Abstract:

Robotic additive manufacturing using pellet extrusion has gained significant scientific interest and industrial maturity. Increased part dimensions, reduced production time, and lower raw material costs are the main advantages of this process. This development has led to a strong demand for improved control and understanding of the process and of multiple phenomena occurring during fabrication. Consequently, process monitoring has received considerable attention, as it enables better understanding and detection of anomalies and their origins during manufacturing, allowing for immediate correction when possible or for more in-depth post-process analyses. Several studies in the literature have focused on monitoring parameters such as extrusion temperature, layer height, and printing speed to investigate their effects on final part quality and mechanical performance. In the present study, the objective is to quantify the forces applied to the deposited material during robotic additive manufacturing by pellet extrusion. This is made possible using a six-component force sensor, which allows the measurement of forces and moments along the three directions (X, Y, and Z). Following data acquisition, the results allowed understanding of force variations throughout the fabrication cycle and their correlation with the different stages of the manufacturing process. A single layer curve was explained with the corresponding peaks of each segment of the trajectory. It was found that at rounds there are peaks in Z forces due to the fact that, at the rounded sections, there is a slight accumulation of material, as the robot’s travel speed decreases while the material flow rate remains constant. This therefore results in higher applied forces. Consequently, it was observed that from the third layer onward, forces along the Z direction were almost no longer detectable. These measurements aim to facilitate the detection of manufacturing defects through unexpected force variations and to relate these observations to the final mechanical properties of the fabricated parts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Kumar, H. Mehdi, S. S. Bhati, M. Arunkumar, S. Mishra, and M. K. Lohumi, "A comprehensive review of advancements in additive manufacturing for 3D printed medical components using diverse materials," Discov. Mater., vol. 5, no. 1, p.152, 2025.

DOI: 10.1007/s43939-025-00349-w

Google Scholar

[2] S. Ouassil, A. El Magri, H. R. Vanaei, and S. Vaudreuil, " Investigating the effect of printing conditions and annealing on the porosity and tensile behavior of 3D ‐printed polyetherimide material in Z ‐direction ," J. Appl. Polym. Sci., no. October, p.1–16, 2022.

DOI: 10.1002/app.53353

Google Scholar

[3] K. Clancy, S. Xie, and O. Onaizah, "Advances in 3D Printing Technologies for Fabricating Magnetic Soft Microrobots," Adv. Intell. Syst., vol. n/a, no. n/a, p.2500051, Jul. 2025.

DOI: 10.1002/aisy.202500051

Google Scholar

[4] A. D. Toth, J. Padayachee, T. Mahlatji, and S. Vilakazi, "Report on case studies of additive manufacturing in the South African railway industry," Sci. African, vol. 16, 2022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01219

Google Scholar

[5] H. Amirahmadi et al., "Screw extrusion-based additive manufacturing of fiber-reinforced high-temperature thermoplastics," Iran. Polym. J., 2025.

DOI: 10.1007/s13726-025-01536-5

Google Scholar

[6] K. Mitchell et al., "Molten Embedded Writing of End-Use Thermoplastics for Engineering Applications," ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, vol. 17, no. 50, p.68417–68430, Dec. 2025.

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5c16456

Google Scholar

[7] R. A. Nargis and D. A. Jack, "Fiber Orientation Quantification for Large Area Additively Manufactured Parts Using SEM Imaging," Polymers (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 13, p.2871, Jun. 2023.

DOI: 10.3390/POLYM15132871

Google Scholar

[8] J. Sultana, M. M. Rahman, Y. Wang, A. Ahmed, and C. Xiaohu, "Influences of 3D printing parameters on the mechanical properties of wood PLA filament: an experimental analysis by Taguchi method," Prog. Addit. Manuf., vol. 9, no. 4, p.1239–1251, 2024.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-023-00516-6

Google Scholar

[9] A. El Magri, S. E. Ouassil, and S. Vaudreuil, "Effects of printing parameters on the tensile behavior of 3D-printed acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) material in Z direction," Polym. Eng. Sci., vol. 62, no. 3, p.848–860, 2022.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.25891

Google Scholar

[10] M. Mencarelli, M. Sisella, L. Puggelli, B. Innocenti, and Y. Volpe, "Sensitivity Analysis of 3D Printing Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling-Printed Polylactic Acid Parts," Appl. Mech., vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2025.

DOI: 10.3390/applmech6010017

Google Scholar

[11] H. Gaub, "Customization of mass-produced parts by combining injection molding and additive manufacturing with Industry 4.0 technologies," Reinf. Plast., vol. 60, no. 6, p.401–404, Nov. 2016.

DOI: 10.1016/j.repl.2015.09.004

Google Scholar

[12] M. Mele, G. Campana, and G. Fumelli, "Environmental impact assessment of Arburg plastic freeforming additive manufacturing," Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 28, p.405–418, Oct. 2021.

DOI: 10.1016/J.SPC.2021.06.012

Google Scholar

[13] S. Singamneni, A. Warnakula, D. A. Smith, and M. J. Le Guen, "Biopolymer Alternatives in Pellet Form for 3D Printing by Extrusion," 3D Print. Addit. Manuf., vol. 6, no. 4, p.217–226, Aug. 2019.

DOI: 10.1089/3DP.2018.0152

Google Scholar

[14] M. Fabrizio, M. Strano, D. Farioli, and H. Giberti, "Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of PEI Pellets," J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2022, Vol. 6, Page 157, vol. 6, no. 6, p.157, Dec. 2022.

DOI: 10.3390/JMMP6060157

Google Scholar

[15] F. Pignatelli and G. Percoco, "An application- and market-oriented review on large format additive manufacturing, focusing on polymer pellet-based 3D printing," Progress in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 7, no. 6. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, p.1363–1377, Dec. 01, 2022.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-022-00309-3

Google Scholar

[16] Y. P. Shaik, J. Schuster, A. Shaik, Y. P. Shaik, J. Schuster, and A. Shaik, "A Scientific Review on Various Pellet Extruders Used in 3D Printing FDM Processes," vol. 8, no. 8, Jul. 2021.

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1107698

Google Scholar

[17] S. Singamneni, D. Smith, M. J. LeGuen, and D. Truong, "Extrusion 3D Printing of Polybutyrate-Adipate-Terephthalate-Polymer Composites in the Pellet Form," Polym. 2018, Vol. 10, Page 922, vol. 10, no. 8, p.922, Aug. 2018.

DOI: 10.3390/POLYM10080922

Google Scholar

[18] P. Urhal, A. Weightman, C. Diver, and P. Bartolo, "Robot assisted additive manufacturing: A review," Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 59, p.335–345, 2019.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.005

Google Scholar

[19] J. Lettori, R. Raffaeli, P. Bilancia, M. Peruzzini, and M. Pellicciari, "A review of geometry representation and processing methods for cartesian and multiaxial robot-based additive manufacturing," Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 123, no. 11, p.3767–3794, 2022.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-10432-8

Google Scholar

[20] Prusa3d, "Types of printers and their differences," https://help.prusa3d.com/article/types-of-printers-and-their-differences_112464, 2025.

Google Scholar

[21] D. Moreno Nieto and S. I. Molina, "Large-format fused deposition additive manufacturing: a review," Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 26, no. 5. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., p.793–799, May 19, 2020.

DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0126

Google Scholar

[22] A. Oleff, B. Küster, M. Stonis, and L. Overmeyer, "Process monitoring for material extrusion additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review," Prog. Addit. Manuf., vol. 6, no. 4, p.705–730, 2021.

DOI: 10.1007/s40964-021-00192-4

Google Scholar

[23] M. Barry, Y. Jacquet, F. Z. Kachkouch, and A. Perrot, "Instrumentation of the Extruder Nozzle Using Load Cells: Towards an In-Line Quality Control Device for 3D Printed Cement-Based Materials BT - Fourth RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication," 2024, p.142–149.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-70031-6_17

Google Scholar

[24] I. Christodoulou, A. Trikkas, and A. Markopoulos, "Measurement and Analysis of Extrusion Forces in Filament-Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies Using ABS Filament," Lect. Notes Mech. Eng., p.259–271, 2025.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-83583-4_18

Google Scholar

[25] J. Dietz, P. Wüst, D. Spiehl, E. Dörsam, and A. Blaeser, "Force-based process monitoring in extrusion-based additive manufacturing," Virtual Phys. Prototyp., vol. 20, no. 1, 2025.

DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2025.2567383

Google Scholar

[26] J. W. Kopatz, D. Reinholtz, A. W. Cook, A. S. Tappan, and A. M. Grillet, "Pressure-based process monitoring of direct-ink write material extrusion additive manufacturing," Addit. Manuf., vol. 80, p.103928, Jan. 2024.

DOI: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2023.103928

Google Scholar

[27] W. De Backer, P. Sinkez, I. Chhabra, M. van Tooren, and A. P. Bergs, "In-process monitoring of continuous fiber additive manufacturing through force/torque sensing on the nozzle," AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, vol. 1 PartF, p.1–8, 2020.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1632

Google Scholar

[28] S. Kasmi, G. Ginoux, S. Allaoui, S. Alix, and A. Sébastien, "Investigation of 3D printing strategy on the mechanical performance of coextruded continuous carbon fiber reinforced PETG," PETG. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 138, no. 37, 2021.

DOI: 10.1002/app.50955

Google Scholar

[29] P. Zmuda Trzebiatowski, T. Królikowski, A. Ubowska, and K. Wilpiszewska, "Preparation and Properties of PETG Filament Modified with a Metallic Additive," Materials (Basel)., vol. 18, no. 6, Mar. 2025.

DOI: 10.3390/ma18061203

Google Scholar