Accessing the Residual Strain Development in Thick FRP Composite Laminates Using Embedded Temperature and FBG Strain Sensors

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work investigates the development of residual stress in thick laminates based on measured internal strain and temperature information. Here, FBG and conventional strain gauges are used to investigate the effect of curing on residual stresses in a thick Epoxy-glass composite laminate incorporated. A 14 mm thick EP-FRP laminate is manufactured by embedding strain and temperature sensors to acquire the signals during curing. Later, the EP-FRP composite is cured and the temperature and strain variation at different layers are monitored using embedded strain and temperature sensors. The experimental temperature development is used to predict the degree of cure at different layers. The knowledge of degree of cure in turn helps to estimate the resin shrinkage percentage at different layers. Strain is mainly developed due to the chemical shrinkage of resin during curing and due to the mismatch in CTE of resin and reinforcement material. Both the components of strain are measured by using the embedded strain sensors. It is observed that the middle layers gelled first (Layer 6 and 13), followed by bottom layer (Layer 1), and top layers gelled last (Layer 16,18): the gel times were 28-30 min for middle plies, 34 min for lower plies and 36 min for top layers. The temperature gradient along the thickness is resulted from the heat evolved during exothermic curing reaction. Maximum temperature peak of 99 °C is observed in the middle layer of the laminate. The measured temperature variation can be further related to the variation in cure shrinkage strain and thermal residual strain levels. This work shows embedded strain and temperature sensors are useful to monitor the cure progression as well as residual strain development in a thick composite laminate

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

55-60

Citation:

Online since:

June 2026

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2026 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mostafa Nasiri, Ali Abedian, Comparative study on the evolution of process-induced residual stresses and deformations in thick and ultra-thick vacuum-infused laminates for wind turbine blades, J. Compos. Mater. 59 (2025) 3381–3410.

DOI: 10.1177/00219983251349277

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Chen, Y. Ji, X. Hu, Residual flexural properties of surface scratched CFRP laminates with diverse span lengths and thickness profiles, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 36 (2025) 4453–4463. https://doi.org/.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.124

Google Scholar

[3] T.A. Bogetti, J.W. Gillespie Jr, Process-induced stress and deformation in thick-section thermoset composite laminates, J. Compos. Mater. 26 (1992) 626–660.

DOI: 10.1177/002199839202600502

Google Scholar

[4] Y.K. Kim, S.R. White, Viscoelastic analysis of processing-induced residual stresses in thick composite laminates, Mechanics Of Composite Materials And Structures An International Journal 4 (1997) 361–387.

DOI: 10.1080/10759419708945889

Google Scholar

[5] R. Protz, E. Kunze, T. Luplow, L. Littner, J. Drummer, S. Heimbs, M. Kreutzbruck, B. Fiedler, M. Gude, Manufacture, process simulation, modelling and testing of thick-walled thermoset fibre-polymer composite laminates—A review, Compos. Struct. (2025) 119678.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119678

Google Scholar

[6] J. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Chang, C. Sun, J. Lu, Identifying damage to composite materials based on deep residual shrinkage network, The Aeronautical Journal 129 (2025) 156–168.

DOI: 10.1017/aer.2024.83

Google Scholar

[7] P. Olivier, M. Cavarero, Comparison between longitudinal tensile characteristics of thin and thick thermoset composite laminates: influence of curing conditions, Comput. Struct. 76 (2000) 125–137.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(99)00161-3

Google Scholar

[8] S.S. Venkat, S. Scheffler, P.M. Anilkumar, E. Baranger, R. Rolfes, Effect of delamination defects on buckling and growth characteristics in composite laminates, Compos. Struct. (2025) 119245.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119245

Google Scholar

[9] D. Joh, K.Y. Byun, J. Ha, Thermal residual stresses in thick graphite/epoxy composite laminates—uniaxial approach, Exp. Mech. 33 (1993) 70–76.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02322554

Google Scholar

[10] O. Yuksel, I. Baran, N. Ersoy, R. Akkerman, Investigation of transverse residual stresses in a thick pultruded composite using digital image correlation with hole drilling, Compos. Struct. 223 (2019) 110954.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110954

Google Scholar

[11] P.P. Parlevliet, H.E.N. Bersee, A. Beukers, Residual stresses in thermoplastic composites—A study of the literature—Part II: Experimental techniques, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 38 (2007) 651–665.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.07.002

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Zhang, Z. Xia, F. Ellyin, Evolution and influence of residual stresses/strains of fiber reinforced laminates, Compos. Sci. Technol. 64 (2004) 1613–1621.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.11.012

Google Scholar

[13] S. Mohanta, Y. Padarthi, J. Gupta, S. Neogi, In-Situ Determination of Degree of Cure by Mapping with Strain Measured by Embedded FBG and Conventional Sensor during VIM Process, Fibers and Polymers 21 (2020) 2614–2624.

DOI: 10.1007/s12221-020-1064-5

Google Scholar

[14] T. Tsukada, S. Minakuchi, N. Takeda, Identification of process-induced residual stress/strain distribution in thick thermoplastic composites based on in situ strain monitoring using optical fiber sensors, J. Compos. Mater. 53 (2019) 3445–3458.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998319837199

Google Scholar