Paper Titles

Biodegradable Coralline Hydroxyapatite Composite-Gel Using Natural Alginate
p.407

Silica/Calcium Phosphate Sol-Gel Derived Bone Grafting Material and Bone Remodelling. An eight Months In Vivo Study
p.411

Titanium Dioxide/Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Composite for Bone-Repairing Applications: Preparation and Biocompatibility
p.415

In Vivo Evaluation of Macroporous Calcium Metaphosphate Ceramic as a Bone Substitute
p.419

Bioactive Composite Chitosan Membranes to Be Used in Bone Regeneration Applications
p.423

The Use of New Zealand Animal Bone as Bioceramic Bone Xenografts: Concept to Clinical Study
p.427

Effects of Substrate Morphology on Osteoblastic Response to Thin Film Calcium Phosphate Coatings
p.433

Surface Properties of HAp Particles Obtained by Hydrothermal Decomposition of Urea and Calcium-EDTA Chelates
p.437

High Osteoconductive Surface for Bioactive Glass by Electrical Polarization
p.441

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 240-242Bioactive Composite Chitosan Membranes to Be Used...

Bioactive Composite Chitosan Membranes to Be Used in Bone Regeneration Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Bioceramics 15

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 240-242)

Pages:

423-426

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.240-242.423

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2003

Authors:

Ricardo M.P. da Silva, P.B. Malafaya, João F. Mano, Rui L. Reis

Keywords:

Bioactivity, Bone, Chitosan (CS), Composite, Degradation, Hydroxyapatite (HAP), Membrane

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2003 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.S. Chang, et al.: Biomaterials Vol. 21 (2000), p.1291.

[2] C. Kasperk, R. Ewers, B. Simons, R. Kasperk: Int J Oral Maxillofacial Vol 17 (1988), p.319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80012-2

[3] M.N. Kumar: React Funct Polym Vol. 46 (2000), p.1.

[4] R. L. Reis, et al.: J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. Vol 8 (1997), p.897.

[5] J. I. Fenton, et al.: Osteoarthr Cartilage Vol 8 (2000), p.444. (a) (b) (c) (d) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 Immersion period (days) Elemental Conc (mmol/dm 3) P Ca 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 Immersion period (days) Elemental Conc (mmol/dm 3) P Ca 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 Immersion period (days) Elemental Conc (mmol/dm 3) P Ca 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 10 20 30 40 50 Immersion period (days) Elemental Conc (mmol/dm 3) P Ca

DOI: 10.1055/b-0034-33106