Improving Subcritical Crack Growth Resistance for Alumina Glass Dental Composite

Q. Zhu; G. de With

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.280-283.1623

Paper Titles

The Influence of Nanosized Leucite on Dental Porcelain Properties
p.1605

Microstructure and Bio-Mineralization Behavior of the Sol-Gel Derived Bioactive Materials
p.1609

Structural Assessment of Microsphere-Based Tissue Engineered Scaffold from Poly(Lactic Acid)/ß-Tricalcium Phosphate
p.1613

Effects of Ingredients and Post-Heat Treatment on Phase Transformation and Structure of Bioactive Composite Coatings
p.1619

Improving Subcritical Crack Growth Resistance for Alumina Glass Dental Composite
p.1623

Study of Animal Bio-Ceramic Implants with 3D High Resolution CT
p.1629

The Monolithic Glass-Ceramic Lined Steel Elbow Made by SHS Gravitational-Thermite Process
p.1631

Crystallization and Thermal Expansion of MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-TiO₂ Glass-Ceramics
p.1635

Crystallization and Mechanical Properties of Spodumene-Diopside Glass Ceramics
p.1639

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 280-283Improving Subcritical Crack Growth Resistance for...

Improving Subcritical Crack Growth Resistance for Alumina Glass Dental Composite

Abstract:

Abstract. The improvement of subcritical crack growth (SCG) resistance for alumina glass dental composites was explored in this study. The addition of nitrogen to the glass phases in the composite was found to increase the SCG resistance, where the SCG exponent n increases from 22 for the oxide glass composites to 30 for the composites containing 0.5 mol% nitrogen in the glass phases. The improvement was tentatively attributed to the nitrogen addition, which makes the glass network stronger through forming the non-flexible Si-N bonds and thus inhibits the hydrolysis reactions under the SCG conditions. Analyses demonstrated that the increase of the n value from 22 to 30 offers the potential to greatly extend the lifetime and improve the long-term reliability for the alumina glass dental composites.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 280-283)

Pages:

1623-1628

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.280-283.1623

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2007

Authors:

Q. Zhu, G. de With

Keywords:

All-Ceramic Dental Composites, Alumina Glass Composite, Bioceramic, Sub Critical Crack Growth

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Q. Zhu, G. de With, L. J. M. G. Dortmans and F. Feenstra: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Appl. Biomater. Vol. 65B (2003), p.233.

Google Scholar

[2] E. D. Rekow and P. Thompson: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 198-199 (2001), p.115.

Google Scholar

[3] J. R. Kelly: Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. Vol. 27 (1997), p.443.

Google Scholar

[4] S. M. Wiederhorn: Fracture mechanics of ceramics (Plenum, New, York, USA 1974), p.613.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Tyszblat: US Patent No. 4 772 436, (1988).

Google Scholar

[6] P. Chantikul, G. R. Anstis and B. R. Lawn: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 64 (1981), p.539.

Google Scholar

[7] R. E. Loehman: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 56 (1983), p.123.

Google Scholar

[8] D. de Graaf: Chemistry, Structure and properties of rare-earth containing Si-Al-O-N glasses (Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands, 2004).

Google Scholar

[9] D. N. Coon: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 226 (1998), p.281.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Bhatnagar, M. J. Hoffman and R. H. Dauskardt: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 83 (2000), p.585.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Sakka: J. Non-Cryst. Solids Vol. 181 (1995), p.215.

Google Scholar

[12] T. A. Michalski and B. C. Bunker: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 56 (1984), p.2686.

Google Scholar

[13] J. E. Ritter: Fracture mechanics of ceramics (Plenum, New York, USA, 1976), p.667.

Google Scholar

[14] M. L. Myers, J. W. Ergle, C. W. Fairhurst and R. D. Ringle: Int. J. Prosthodont. Vol. 7 (1994), p.253.

Google Scholar