A Potent Osteogenic Composite of Stem Cells – Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramic Enhanced the Posterior Spinal Fusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) possess a high replicative capacity and have the capacity to differentiate into various connective tissue cell types. With the advance in cell culture technique, the BMSCs have been induced to differentiate to osteoblastics linage. To improve the situation of non-union in posterior spinal fusion (PSF), tissue engineering approach to combine BMSCs supported by the calcium phosphate ceramics was applied in PSF and its effect was investigated in the present study. Autologous BMSCs from 16-week-old rabbit tibiae were expanded and induced to differentiate into osteoblastic cells with defined medium and osteogenic supplement. Calcium phosphate ceramic (CPC) was used as the scaffold to deliver the cells to the standardized rabbit posterior spinal fusion model. The assessment of bone mineral and fusion mass volume was conducted at week 7 post-operation with quantitative computed tomography and micro-computed tomography. When compared with control, the composite of BMSCs with CPC enhanced the fusion mass volume by 40% (p<0.05) and bone mineral content in the CPC was 7% (p=0.05) higher. Our study showed that additional BMSCs at the fusion site of PSF did provide extra resource for new bone formation and enhanced the fusion rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 288-289)

Pages:

39-42

Citation:

Online since:

June 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bruder SP, Fox BS: Tissue engineering of bone. Cell based strategies. Clin OrthopS68-S83, (1999).

Google Scholar

[2] Schimandle JH, Boden SD: Spinal Fusion: Bone Grafts and bone Graft Substitutes for Spinal Fusion. In: The Spine, Rothman-Simeone pp.1610-1629. Ed by HN Herkowitz, RH Rothman, and FA Simeone. Philadephia, W.B. Saunders, 1999 A B C D.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4160-6726-9.00067-5

Google Scholar

[3] Wang W, Hu Y, Lu S: Study on the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocyte in vitro. Chin J Surg 38: 160, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] Lennon DP, Haynesworth SE, Young RG, Dennis JE, Caplan AI: A chemically defined medium supports in vitro proliferation and maintains the osteochondral potential of rat marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Cell Res 219: 211-222, (1995).

DOI: 10.1006/excr.1995.1221

Google Scholar

[5] Uchida A, Kikuchi T, Shimomura Y: Osteogenic capacity of cultured human periosteal cells. Acta Orthop Scand 59: 29-33, (1988).

DOI: 10.3109/17453678809149339

Google Scholar

[6] Cui C, Hu Y, Lei W: The influence of injectable osteoinductive material with rhBMP-2 and bFGF on the proliferation and ultrastructure of marrow stromal cell on rabit. Chin J Clin Rehabilitation 6: 2376-2377, (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Dou Y, Shun L, Hu Y: Construction and culture in vitro of deantigen bone xenograft block loaded with MSC and alginate. Modern Rehabilitation 5: 41-43, (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] Spivak JM, Hasharoni A: Use of hydroxyapatite in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 10 Suppl 2: S197-S204, (2001).

DOI: 10.1007/s005860100286

Google Scholar

[9] Martin I, Muraglia A, Campanile G, Cancedda R, Quarto R: Fibroblast growth factor-2 supports ex vivo expansion and maintenance of osteogenic precursors from human bone marrow. Endocrinology 138: 4456-4462, (1997).

DOI: 10.1210/endo.138.10.5425

Google Scholar

[10] Yaylaoglu MB, Yildiz C, Korkusuz F, Hasirci V: A novel osteochondral implant. Biomaterials 20: 1513-1520, (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00062-9

Google Scholar

[11] Cheng JC: Current concepts of surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Recent Advances in Orthopaedics Ed by S Bhan. India, Jaypee Brothers, (1994).

Google Scholar

[12] DePalma AF, Rothman RH: The nature of pseudarthrosis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research 59: 113-118, (1968).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-196807000-00007

Google Scholar

[13] Steinmann JC, Herkowitz HN: Pseudarthrosis of the spine. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research80-90, (1992).

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199211000-00011

Google Scholar

[14] Cheng JC, Guo X, Law LP, Lee KM, Chow DH, Rosier R: How does recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 enhance posterior spinal fusion? Spine 27: 467-474, (2002).

DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00006

Google Scholar

[15] Guo X, Lee KM, Law LP, Chow HK, Rosier R, Cheng CY: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 (rhBMP-4) enhanced posterior spinal fusion without decortication. J Orthop Res 20: 740-746, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-0266(01)00167-x

Google Scholar

[16] Cinotti G, Patti AM, Vulcano A, Della RC, Polveroni G, Giannicola G, Postacchini F: Experimental posterolateral spinal fusion with porous ceramics and mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 135-142, (2004).

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b1.14308

Google Scholar

[17] Boo JS, Yamada Y, Okazaki Y, Hibino Y, Okada K, Hata K, Yoshikawa T, Sugiura Y, Ueda M: Tissue-engineered bone using mesenchymal stem cells and a biodegradable scaffold. J Craniofac Surg 13: 231-239, (2002).

DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200203000-00009

Google Scholar

[18] Kadiyala S, Young RG, Thiede MA, Bruder SP: Culture expanded canine mesenchymal stem cells possess osteochondrogenic potential in vivo and in vitro. Cell Transplantation 6: 125-134, (1997).

DOI: 10.1177/096368979700600206

Google Scholar

[19] Bruder SP, Fink DJ, Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells in bone development, bone repair, and skeletal regeneration therapy. J Cell Biochem 56: 283-294, (1994).

DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240560303

Google Scholar