Micro-Force Calibration with an All-Coil Magnetic Levitation

S.W. Hsu; T.L. Chen

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.295-296.95

Paper Titles

A Study on the Mechanism of a New High Speed Scanning Miniature Nano-Measurement Probe
p.71

Use of Fiber Interferometer for AFM Cantilever Probe Displacement Control
p.77

Determining the Radial Modulus of DNA Measured by VPSFM
p.83

Pitch Calibration by an Active Temperature Controlled Traceable Atomic Force Microscope and a Laser Diffractometer
p.89

Micro-Force Calibration with an All-Coil Magnetic Levitation
p.95

Effect of Residual Stresses on a Micromachined Z-Axis Vibrating Rate Gyroscope
p.101

A Measurement System for Step Imprint Lithography
p.107

Design and Simulation of a DETF for Use in a Resonant Gyroscope
p.113

Micro Angle Measurement for a Scanning Stage
p.119

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 295-296Micro-Force Calibration with an All-Coil Magnetic...

Micro-Force Calibration with an All-Coil Magnetic Levitation

Abstract:

A prototype all-coil electromagnetic force balance has been designed and built. This measurement system compares the mechanical force to an SI realization of electromagnetic force, which is driven from interaction of currents in radial coil set and levitation coil. The preliminary measurement results demonstrate that the magnetic field distribution and magnetic force output are consistent with the results by simulation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Measurement Technology and Intelligent Instruments VI

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 295-296)

Pages:

95-100

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.295-296.95

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2005

Authors:

S.W. Hsu, T.L. Chen

Keywords:

Calibration, Force, Magnetic, Nanomaterial

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] M.D. Kriese, D.A. Boismier, N.R. Moody and W.W. Gerberich: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 61 (1998), p.1.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(98)00050-2

Google Scholar

[2] K. Herrmann, K. Hasche, F. Pohlenz and R. Seemann: Measurement, Vol. 29 (2001), p.201.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Tanikawa, M. Kawai, N. Koyochi, T. Arai, T. Ide, S. Kaneko, R. Ohta and T. Hirose: Proc of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2001, p.610.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2001.932617

Google Scholar

[4] M.A. Greminger, G. Yang and B.J. Nelson: Proc of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 2002, p. (1943).

Google Scholar

[5] Z.L. Jabbour and S.L. Yaniv: Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol. 106 (2001), p.25.

Google Scholar

[6] D.B. Newell, J.A. Kramar, J.R. Pratt, D.T. Smith and E.R. Williams: IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 52 (2003), p.508.

Google Scholar

[7] E.R. Williams, R.L. Steiner, D.B. Newell and P.T. Olsen: Physical Review Letters, Vol. 81 (1998), p.2404.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Bertinetto, M. Bisi, P. Cordiale, E. Canuto, A. Rolino and S. Cesare: Proc. of CPEM (2002), p.518.

DOI: 10.1109/cpem.2002.1034950

Google Scholar

[9] W. Beer, A.L. Eichenberger, B. Jeanneret, B. Jeckelmann, A.R. Pourzand, P. Richard and.J.P. Schwarz: IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., Vol. 52 (2003), p.626.

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2003.810033

Google Scholar

[10] J.D. Jackson: Classical Electrodynamics (John Willy & Sons, New York 1975).

Google Scholar