Slip Line Field Analysis of Unequally Grooved Specimens in Bending and Its Implication to Constraint Toughness Testing

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes slip line fields for bending of unequally grooved specimens that has a sharp crack in one side and a sharp V-notch in the other side. Depending on the back angle, two slip line fields are proposed, from which the limit moment and crack tip stress fields are obtained as a function of the back angle. Excellent agreements between slip line field solutions with those from detailed finite element limit analysis based on non-hardening plasticity provide confidence in the proposed slip line fields. Based on these results, possibility of designing a new toughness testing specimen with varying crack tip constraint is discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 306-308)

Pages:

25-30

Citation:

Online since:

March 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] O'Dowd, N P. and Shih, C F. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1991, 39, 989-1015.

Google Scholar

[2] J W. Hancock, W G. Reuter, and D M. Parks (1993). In Constraint Effect in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 21-40.

Google Scholar

[3] J A. Joyce, E M. Hackett, and C. Roe (1993). In Constraint Effect in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 239-263.

Google Scholar

[4] Roos E. Eisele U. Silcher H. In Constraint Effect in Fracture, ASTM STP 1171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia. 1993. 41-63.

Google Scholar

[5] Kirk, M T. and Dodds, R-H Jr. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 1993, 21, 228-238.

Google Scholar

[6] Schwalbe, K-H., Neale, B K. and Heerens, J., EFAM GTP 94. GKSS Report GKSS/94/E/60. GKSS Froschungszentrum, Geesthacht, Germany, (1994).

DOI: 10.3940/rina.aco.2001.8

Google Scholar

[7] Kim, Y J. and Budden P J., Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2001, 24, 751-760.

Google Scholar

[8] Kim, Y J, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2002, 69, 793-811.

Google Scholar

[9] Kim, Y J., Sohn, B G. and Kim, Y J, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2004, 71, 945-966.

Google Scholar

[10] Pardoen, Y., Sciebetta, M., Chaouadi, R. and Delannay F., International Journal of Fracture, 2000, 103, 205-225.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1007668030117

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM Standard, E 1739-96, Annual Book of ASTM Standards.

Google Scholar

[12] McClintock, F.A., Plasticity aspects of fracture. In H. Liebowitz (ed. ), Fracture Vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, 1971, 47-225.

Google Scholar

[13] Green, A.P. and Hundy B.B., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1956, 4, 128-144.

Google Scholar

[14] Ewing, D.G.F., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1968, 16, 205-213.

Google Scholar

[15] ABAQUS User's Manual. version 6. 3, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc., Providence, RI, (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] Lee, H. and Parks, D.M., International Journal of Fracture, 1993, 63, 329-349.

Google Scholar

[17] Ainsworth, R A., Sattari-Far, I., Sherry, A H., Hooton, D G. and Hadley, I., Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2000, 67, 563-572.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00074-6

Google Scholar