Polarization Energy Effect of Electrovector Hydroxyapatite on Bonelike Crystal Growth in SBF

Satoshi Nakamura; Keiichirou Shinohara; Nobuo Kieda; Kimihiro Yamashita

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.309-311.145

Paper Titles

Preparation of Hollow and Spherical β-Calcium Orthophosphate Agglomerates: Effect of Organic Compound Addition to the Spraying Solution
p.129

Carbonate Substituted Hydroxyapatite; Development and Function of Osteoclasts
p.133

Fluoridated Ca-Deficient Apatite Formed Via Octacalcium Phosphate Enhances Bone Regeneration
p.137

F-Substituted Carbonate Apatite for Promoting Bone Formation
p.141

Polarization Energy Effect of Electrovector Hydroxyapatite on Bonelike Crystal Growth in SBF
p.145

Immediate Mechanism of the Osteoconductivity of the Polarized Hydroxyapatite
p.149

The Effects of Electrically Polarized Hydroxyapatite on Osteogenic Cell Activity and Bone Formation
p.153

Optimum Conditions for Superosteoconductivity of Polarized Hydroxyapatite Ceramics
p.157

An In Vitro Comparative Study of Bioglass and Biologically Derived Hydroxyapatite with Bone Scintigraphy (BS) Method
p.163

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 309-311Polarization Energy Effect of Electrovector...

Polarization Energy Effect of Electrovector Hydroxyapatite on Bonelike Crystal Growth in SBF

Abstract:

An electrovector effect of the polarized hydroxyapatite (HA) on crystal growth in a simulated body fluid was clarified to discuss the role of the polarization energy in the effect. The polarization of the HA carried out in high dc field at 300-600°C was confirmed by thermally stimulated depolarization current measurements. The dependence of the thickness of the crystal grown layer on the induced charge was remarkably indicated in the modification of the growth rates. The growth rate under an optimum polarization condition was estimated to be almost 3 times of that by the biomimetic method. At the early stage of the crystal growth, the grown crystals were spherical and their sizes were dependent on the field strength and time for polarization. The polarization is therefore considered to effect the nucleation as well as the crystal growth.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

145-148

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.309-311.145

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2006

Authors:

Satoshi Nakamura, Keiichirou Shinohara, Nobuo Kieda, Kimihiro Yamashita

Keywords:

Electrostatic Stimulation, Electrovector Effect, Hydroxyapatite (HAP), Polarisation, Surface Charge

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] K. Yamashita, K. Kitagaki and T. Umegaki: J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 78 (1995), p.1191.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Nakamura, H. Takeda and K. Yamashita: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 89 (2001), p.5386.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Kobayashi, S. Nakamura and K. Yamashita: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 57 (2001), p.477.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Nakamura, T. Kobayashi and K. Yamashita: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 61 (2002), p.593.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Nakamura, T. Kobayashi and K. Yamashita: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 68A (2004), p.90.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Yamashita, N. Oikawa and T. Umegaki: Chem. Mater. Vol. 8 (1996), p.2697.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Yamashita and S. Nakamura, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., Vol. 113 (2005), p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Ueshima, S. Nakamura and K. Yamashita, Adv. Mater. Vol. 14 (2002), p.591.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Kokubo, S. Ito, Z. T. Huang, T. Hayashi and S. Sakka, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 24 (1990), p.331.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Nakamura and K. Yamashita: Phosphorus Research Bulletin Vol. 11 (2000) p.1.

Google Scholar