Surface Properties and Cytocompatibility of Bio-derived Compact Bone as Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Bone

Article Preview

Abstract:

Many scaffolds are candidates for use in tissue engineering approaches for the repair or replacement of bone defects. Among the scaffolds tested for tissue engineering of bone, bio-derived compact bone scaffold (BDCBS) containing mineralized collagen fibers, phosphorus and calcium, as natural bone does, is one of the most promising candidates for this purpose. To analyze how appropriate the BDCBS would be for tissue engineering purposes, we established an in vitro characterization system to describe the surface properties and cytocompaibility of the scaffold. Surface properties were determined by means of scanning electron microscope and scanning probe microscope. The surface phase was examined with the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Osteoblasts from human embryos were isolated from the periosteum. After in vitro expansion, cells were cultivated on the BDCBS. Real-time cell culture was used to monitor the growth process of cells seeded on the scaffold. Using this in vitro characterization, we were able to demonstrate effective growth of osteoblasts on this scaffold. In summary, BDCBS has the surface characterization similar to a natural bone and also has strong affinity for osteoblast attachment and proliferation, indicating the potential as an effective scaffold used in tissue engineering bone.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 309-311)

Pages:

895-898

Citation:

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.R. Vaccaro: Orthopedics Vol. 25(5 suppl)(2002), p. s571.

Google Scholar

[2] T.W. Bauer, G.F. Muschler: Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. Vol. 371 (2000), p.10.

Google Scholar

[3] S.P. Bruder, K.H. Kraus, V.M. Goldberg et al: J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Vol. 80 (1998), p.985.

Google Scholar

[4] L.U. Lichun, Z. Xun, G. Richard et al: J. Orthop. Res. Vol. 3915 (2001), p.251.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Tamada, Y. Ikada: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 28(1994), p.783.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Lydon, T. Minett, B. Tighe: Biomaterials Vol. 6 (1985), p.396.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Yamaguchi, N. Chattopadhyay, O. Kifor et al: Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. Vol. 280 (2001), p. C382.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Gilbert, C.M. Giacheli, P.S. Stayton:J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 67A(1) (2003), p.69.

Google Scholar

[9] D.P. Bottaro, A. Liebmann-Vinson, M.A. Heidaran: Ann. New York Acad. Sci. Vol. 961(2002), p.143.

Google Scholar