Comparison of New Bone Formation and Osteotomy Speed in the Rabbit Mandible Using Piezoelectric Surgery and Conventional Burs

K.H. Yun; S.G. Kim; Sung Chul Lim

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.1257

Paper Titles

Comparative Study of Biphasic Calcium Phosphates with Different HA/TCP Ratios in Mandibular Bone Defects. Long-Term Histomorphometric Study in Minipigs
p.1241

Repairing Segmental Defect with a Composite Associating Collagen Membrane and MBCP® Combined with Total Bone Marrow Graft in Irradiated Bone Defect: an Experimental Study in Rabbit
p.1245

Quantitative Micro-Radiography of New Bones Formed around the Implant Using Parametrics X-Ray
p.1249

Bone Regenerative Property of Octacalcium Phosphate in Mouse Critical Sized Calvarial Defects
p.1253

Comparison of New Bone Formation and Osteotomy Speed in the Rabbit Mandible Using Piezoelectric Surgery and Conventional Burs
p.1257

Effect of Synthetic β-TCP and Bovine-Derived Hydroxyapatite Grafting on Bone Regeneration in Rats
p.1261

Hybrid Chitosan Membranes Tested in Sheep for Guided Tissue Regeneration
p.1265

Stimulatory Effect on Osseous Repair of Zinc-Substituted Hydroxyapatite: Histological Study in Rabbit’s Tibia
p.1269

Effect of Hydroxyapatite and Zinc-Containing Hydroxyapatite on Osseous Repair of Critical Size Defect in the Rat Calvaria
p.1273

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 361-363Comparison of New Bone Formation and Osteotomy...

Comparison of New Bone Formation and Osteotomy Speed in the Rabbit Mandible Using Piezoelectric Surgery and Conventional Burs

Abstract:

We compared the effect of osteotomies performed using piezoelectric surgery (Piezosurgery®) and the conventional bur method on new bone formation in the rabbit mandible, focusing on light-microscopy observations of the early healing process after 1, 2, and 4 weeks. The time required to perform the osteotomy was also compared. We showed that piezoelectric surgery and the conventional bur method had no marked difference on early bone healing, although the osteotomy time was shorter with the conventional bur method than with Piezosurgery. Because the instrument used in Piezosurgery is sharp and more controllable, piezoelectric surgery should be more useful for delicate surgery, such as maxillary sinus lifting and segmental osteotomies, with the fewest complications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

1257-1260

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.1257

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2007

Authors:

K.H. Yun, S.G. Kim, Sung Chul Lim

Keywords:

Conventional Bur, New Bone Formation, Osteotomy Speed, Piezoelectric Surgery, Rabbit Mandible

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] A.D. Walmsley, W.R.E. Laird and P.J. Lumley: J. Dentistry Vol. 20 (1992), pp.11-17.

Google Scholar

[2] J.E. Horton, T.M. Tarpley and J.R. Jacoway: Oral Surg. Vol. 51 (1981), pp.236-241.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Eggers, J. Klein, J. Blank and S. Haddfeld: Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Vol. 42 (2004), pp.451-453.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Robiony, F. Polini, F. Costa, T. Vercellotti and M. Politi: J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Vol. 62 (2004), pp.759-761.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.01.010

Google Scholar

[5] S. Stubinger, J. Kuttenberg, A. Filippi, R. Sader and H.F. Zeilhofer: J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Vol. 63 (2005), pp.1283-1287.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Torrella, J. Pitarch, G. Cubanes and E. Anitua: Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants Vol. 13 (1998), pp.697-700.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Chirac, M. Herten, F. Schwarz, D. Rothamel and J. Becker: J. Clin. Periodontol. Vol. 32 (2005), pp.994-999.

Google Scholar