Nanomechanical Properties and Nanostructure of CMG and CMP Machined Si Substrates

Article Preview

Abstract:

Silicon (100) substrates machined by chemo-mechanical-grinding (CMG) and chemicalmechanical- polishing (CMP) were investigated using atomic force microscopy, cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy and nanoindentation. It was found that the substrate surface after CMG was slightly better than machined by CMP in terms of roughness. The transmission electron microscopy analysis showed that the CMG-generated subsurface was defect-free, but the CMP specimen had a crystalline layer of about 4 nm in thickness on the top of the silicon lattice as evidenced by the extra diffraction spots. Nanoindentation results indicated that there exists a slight difference in mechanical properties between the CMG and CMP machined substrates.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 381-382)

Pages:

525-528

Citation:

Online since:

June 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. Zhou, S. Kawaii, S. Kimura, J. Shimizu and H. Eda: Proc. of Int. Conf. on LEM21, Nagoya, Japan, Oct. 19-22, 2005, pp.889-892.

Google Scholar

[2] L. Zhou, J. Shimizu and H. Eda: Int. J. Manuf. Tec. Manag., Vol. 7 (2005), No. 5-6, pp.441-454.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Zhou, J. Shinizu, H. Eda and S. Kimura: J. Jpn Soc. Prec. Eng., Vol. 71 (2005), No. 4, pp.466-470.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Zhou, H. Eda, J. Shimizu, S. Kamiya, H. Iwase and S. Kimura: Ann. CIRP, Vol. 55 (2006), No. 1, pp.313-316.

Google Scholar

[5] R. R. Kunz, H. R. Clark, P. M. Nitishin, M. Rothschild and B. S. Ahern: J. Mater. Res., Vol. 11 (1996), No. 5, pp.1228-1237.

Google Scholar

[6] J. W. Yan, H. Takahashi, J. Tamaki and X. H. Gai, Appli. Phys. Lett. 86 (2005) 181913 1-3.

Google Scholar

[7] I. Zarudi and L.C. Zhang, J. Mat. Process. Tech. 84 (1998) 149-158.

Google Scholar

[8] I. Zarudi, J. Zou, W. McBride and L.C. Zhang: Appli. Phys. Lett., Vol. 85 (2004), No. 6, pp.932-934.

Google Scholar

[9] W.C. Oliver and G.M. Phare: J. Mater. Res., Vol. 19 (2004), No. 1, pp.3-20.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Daugela, H. Kutomi and T. J. Wyrobek: Z. Metallkd., Vol. 92 (2001), No. 9, pp.1052-1056.

Google Scholar

100 200 300 400.

Google Scholar

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000.

Google Scholar

500 1000 1500 (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] [4] [6] [8] (b) Normalized PSD Frequency, (kHz) (a) 0. 00 0. 02 0. 04 0. 06 0. 08 0. 10 -1.

Google Scholar

[1] Amplitude (V) Time, (ms) Load, (µN) Displacement, (nm) AE.

Google Scholar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7.

Google Scholar

[20] [40] [60] [80] 100 CMG CMP Occurence ratio of AE event, % Peak load, mΝ (c) I II III.

Google Scholar