On the Use of the Theory of Critical Distances to Estimate KIc and ∆Kth from Experimental Results Generated by Testing Standard Notches

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present paper is concerned with the use of the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD), applied in the form of the Point Method (PM), to estimate the range of the threshold value of the stress intensity factor, Kth, as well as the plane strain fracture toughness, KIc. In more detail, by reanalysing a large amount of experimental data taken from the literature, it is proved that Kth can successfully be evaluated through the plain fatigue limit and another fatigue limit generated by testing samples containing a known geometrical feature, whereas KIc is suggested here as being estimated by using experimental results generated by testing samples weakened by notches of different sharpness. The validation exercise summarised in the present paper fully confirms that the TCD is not only a reliable method suitable for performing the static and fatigue assessment of real components, but also an efficient experimental strategy capable of accurately estimating the classical Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) material properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 417-418)

Pages:

25-28

Citation:

Online since:

October 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Anon. Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials. ASTM E399, 1990 (Reapproved 1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Anon. Standard Test Method for measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. ASTM E647, (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Taylor, D. The Theory of Critical Distances: A new perspective in fracture mechanics. Elsevier, Oxford, UK (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Neuber, H. Springer Verlag, Berlin, II Ed. (1958).

Google Scholar

[5] Peterson, R. E. in: Metal Fatigue, edited by G. Sines, J. L. Waisman. New York. McGraw Hill (1959), p.293.

Google Scholar

[6] Whitney, J. M., Nuismer, R. J. Journal of Composite Materials 8 (1974), p.253.

Google Scholar

[7] Tanaka, K. Int. J Fracture 22 (1983), p. R39.

Google Scholar

[8] Taylor, D. Int. J. Fatigue 21 (1999), p.413.

Google Scholar

[9] Taylor, D. Eng Frac Mech 71 (2004), p.2407.

Google Scholar

[10] Susmel, L. Multiaxial Notch Fatigue: from nominal to local stress-strain quantities. Woodhead & CRC, Cambridge, UK (2009).

Google Scholar