Minimizing Stress Concentrations in the Femoral Heads of Hip Joint Prostheses: Effect of Borehole Shapes

Abstract:

This paper presents a stress analysis of the ceramic femoral heads of hip joint prostheses with different borehole shapes to evaluate their mechanical reliability in terms of stress concentration. Under the ideal loading conditions used for ceramic rupture tests specified by the ISO 7206-5 standard, a finite element (FE) modeling is performed to determine the tensile and hoop stress distributions in the ceramic femoral heads. Two borehole shapes that are currently used in the manufacturing industry for hip joint prostheses, namely the flat bottom and keyhole, were first studied. Two new borehole shapes, dome arc and dome ellipse, were then introduced by the authors in the paper to minimize the stress concentration. It was found that while the currently used borehole shapes lead to high tensile notch stresses at their critical corners causing possible fracture failure of ceramic heads, the authors’ borehole designs can improve the mechanical reliability significantly. In addition, the effects of taper-bore contact length and their interface friction are investigated and discussed.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 443)
• Pages: 736-741
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.443.736
• Online since: June 2010
• Authors: Mohammad Sharif Uddin, Liang Chi Zhang
• Keywords: Borehole Shape, Contact Length, Femoral Head, Finite Element, Hip Joint Prosthesis, Interface Friction, Stress Distribution

References

[1] G. Heimke: Advanced Materials Vol. 6(2) (1996), p.165.

[2] E. C. Panagiotopoulos et al.: Clinical Biomechanics Vol. 22 (2007), p.856.

[3] A. Panagiotopoulos et al.: European Journal of Surgical Traumatol Vol. 16 (2006), p.55.

[4] G. William in: Ceramics in Orthopaedics, Proc of the Eighth International BIOLOX Symposium, edited by H. Zippel and M. Dietrich, Steinkopff-Verlag, Berlin (2003).

[5] C. Affolter et al.: Journal of Engineering in Medicine Proc. IMechE Vol. 223 (2009), p.237.

[6] J. Middleton et al.: Journal of Materials Science and Materials in Medicine Vol. 5 (1994), p.503.

[7] Biolox Design: http: / www. Zimmer. com.

[8] ISO 7206-5: (1992).

[9] B. Weisse et al.: Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 36 (2003), p.1633.

[10] W. Macdonald in: Proc. Of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers [H], Vol. 214 (2000), p.685.

[11] G. Bergmann: CD HIP 98 mit Belastung des Huftgelenks (1998).