Investigation of Hardness of Short Abaca (Musa Textile Nee) Fibre-Reinforced High Impact Polystyrene (HIPS) Composites by Response Surface Methodology

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the hardness property of abaca (Musa textile Nee) fibre reinforced high impact polystyrene (HIPS) composites with maelic anhydride (MAH) used as coupling agent and styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) copolymer rubber (Cyclo resin) used as impact modifier was investigated using response surface methodology.. The composites were initially fabricated using a rolling machine and finally using a hot press machine to obtain a desired thickness. These samples were then tested for Brinell hardness test. A statistical approach of response surface methodology was used to obtain the interaction between various compositions mentioned above for abaca fibre reinforced HIPS composites. The BHN (Brinell hardness number) was analyzed using response surface methodology (Box Behnken method).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)

Pages:

821-826

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Sharrock, S. Diversity in the genus Musa. The banana and its relatives. In: INIBAP. Networking Banana and Plantain. Annual Report 1997, Focus Paper III. International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain, Montpellier, France. (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] Joseph S., Sreekala M. S., Oommen Z., Koshy P., Thomas S.: Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 62, (2002), p.1857–1868.

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) Composite Materials 2nd Edition, Philadelphia, PA, (1990), p.10 – 80.

Google Scholar

[4] Ryan, Thomas P., Modern Experimental Design, Jhon Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Anderson, M.J., Whitcomb, P.J., RSM Simplified – Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design of Experiments, Productivity, Inc., New York NY, (2005).

DOI: 10.4324/9781482293777

Google Scholar