Life Cycle Assessment of Particulate Recycled Low Density Polyethylene and Recycled Polypropylene Reinforced with Talc and Fiberglass

Abstract:

Although recycled polymers and reinforced polymer composites have been in use for many years there is little information available on their environmental impacts. The goal of the present study is to analyze the environmental impact of new composite materials obtained from the combination of recycled thermoplastics (polypropylene [PP] and polyethylene [PE]) with mineral fillers like talc and with glass fiber. The environmental impact of these composite materials is compared to the impact of virgin PP and PE. The recycled and virgin materials were compared using life cycle assessment method according to their environmental effects. Within the scope of the study, GaBi software was used for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis. From cradle-to-grave life cycle inventory studies were performed for 1 kg of each of the thermoplastics. Landfilling was considered as reference scenario and compared with filled recycled plastics. A quantitative impact assessment was performed for four environmental impact categories, global warming (GWP) over a hundred years, human toxicity (HTP), abiotic depletion (ADP) and acidification potential (AP) were taken into consideration during LCA. In the comparison of recycled and virgin polymers, it was seen that recycling has lower environmental effect for different impact assessment methods like acidification potential, abiotic depletion, human toxicity and global warming.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 471-472)
• Pages: 999-1004
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.471-472.999
• Online since: February 2011
• Authors: Mariam Al-Ma'adeed, Gozde Ozerkan, Ramazan Kahraman, Saravanan Rajendran, Alma Hodzic
• Keywords: Life Cycle Assessment, Mineral Fillers, Recycling, Thermoplastics

References

[1] R. Vidal, P. Martínez and D. Garraín, International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 14 (2009), pp.73-82.

[2] P. Martínez,., D. Garraín and R. Vidal: 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, Zurich, (2007).

[3] Y. Ivanov, V. Cheskhov and M. Natova: (Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands 2001).

[4] E. Trujillo, L. Osorio, A.W. Van Vuure, J. Ivens and I. Verpoest: 14th European Conference on Composite Materials, Budapest, Hungary (2010).

[5] P. Fowler, J. Hugues and R. Elías, Journal of Science in Food and Agriculture, Vol. 86 (2007a), pp.1781-1789.

[6] J. Diener and U. Siehler: "Ökologischer Vergleich von NMT- und GMT-Bauteilen, Angew Makromol Chem, Vol. 272 (1999), pp.1-4.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-9505(19991201)272:1<1::aid-apmc1>3.0.co;2-4

[7] K. Wötzel, R. Wirth and R. Flake, Angew Makromol Chem, Vol. 272(4763) (1999), pp.121-127.

[8] S. Gärtner and G. Reinhardt: Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Biomass for Energy, Industry and Climate Protection, Rome, Italy (2004).

[9] W. Schmidt, and H. Beyer: Life Cycle Study on a Natural Fiber Reinforced Component, SAE Technical Paper, SAE Total Life Cycle Conference, Austria (1998).

DOI: 10.4271/982195

[10] T. Corbiere-Nicollier, L.B. Gfeller, L. Lundquist, Y. Leterrier, J. Manson and O. Jolliet, Resource Conservative Recycling, Vol. 33 (2001), pp.267-287.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-3449(01)00089-1