Analyzing Manufacturer’s R&D Equilibrium in Defense Procurement

Article Preview

Abstract:

We formulate the model of R&D investment scale adjustment of defense procurement by applying game theory and contest theory and study the equilibrium of manufacturers’ R&D investment decision-making in defense procurement. We explore mainly the influence of valuation of monopolistic contract and differences among manufacturers’ abilities on investment. The conclusion shows that manufacturers’ investment equilibrium of R&D projects is what the government expects under certain conditions, however, manufacturers’ abilities effect on the investment equilibrium and makes it deviate from the government expectation. Therefore, the government must keep practically manufacturers’ anticipation about the monopolistic contact being consistent with government’s and set basic admission criterion to enable manufactures’ ability well-matched to induce the manufacturers’ investment decisions to the investment equilibrium that it desired.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 474-476)

Pages:

1435-1439

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hartly, K., Sandler,T. Economics of Defense Manual. Beijing: Economic Science Press(2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Peck, M.J., Scherer, F.M. The weapons acquisition process: an economic analysis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA(1962).

Google Scholar

[3] Scherer, F.M. The weapons acquisition process: Economic incentives. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA(1964).

Google Scholar

[4] Crocker, K.J. Reynolds K.J. The efficiency of incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of Air force engine procurement. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 24(1993), P. 126~146.

DOI: 10.2307/2555956

Google Scholar

[5] Rogerson, W.P. Incentive the budgetary process and inefficiently low production rates in defense procurement. Defense Economics, Vol. 3(1991), P. 1~18.

DOI: 10.1080/10430719108404711

Google Scholar

[6] Rogerson W.P. Economic incentives and the defense procurement process. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(1994), p.65~90.

DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.4.65

Google Scholar

[7] Tang, G. Entry and R&D costs in procurement contracting. Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 58(1992), p.41~60.

Google Scholar

[8] Dasgupta A., Nti K. O. Designing an optimal contest. European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 14(1998), p.587~603.

DOI: 10.1016/s0176-2680(98)00027-5

Google Scholar