Mechanical Properties of Calcium Phosphate Cements (CPC) for Bone Substitution: Influence of Fabrication and Microstructure

Article Preview

Abstract:

Calcium phosphate cements have been widely used in medical and dental applications for decades. However, their intrinsic high brittleness and low strength prohibit their use in many stress-bearing locations, which would require an improvement in mechanical properties. The influence of microstructural parameters on the latter have nevertheless barely been investigated in a systematic manner. Furthermore, due to their inferior reproducibility which is sensitive to the variations introduced during the preparation and the way they are measured, mechanical properties of CPC cannot simply be characterized using mean values, but request a more reliable method. In this aim, apatite cements have been fabricated by mixing liquid and powders based on α-TCP (α-tricalcium phosphate), and their mechanical properties have been measured (Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, compressive strength and flexural strength) in wet environment as a function of various parameters (liquid-to-powder ratio; amount and morphology of porosity, including macropores created by porogens). The reliability of compressive strength of CPC is analysed using Weibull statistics. The above results indicate that fabrication and microstructural features of CPC significantly influence their mechanical properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 493-494)

Pages:

409-414

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.J. Ambard, L. Mueninghoff, Calcium Phosphate Cement: Review of Mechanical and Biological Properties, J. Prosthodont. 15 (2006) 321-328.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2006.00129.x

Google Scholar

[2] W.E. Brown, L.C. Chow, A new calcium phosphate setting cement, J. Dental. Res. 62 (1983) 672-679.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Bohner, U. Gbureck, J.E. Barralet, Technological issues for the development of more efficient calcium phosphate bone cements: A critical assessment, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 6423-6429.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.049

Google Scholar

[4] M. Bohner, Reactivity of calcium phosphate cements, J. Mater. Chem. 17 (2007) 3980-3986.

Google Scholar

[5] K.S. TenHuisen, P.W. Brown, Formation of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite from alpha-tricalcium phosphate, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 2209-2217.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00131-8

Google Scholar

[6] O. Gauthier, J.M. Bouler, E. Aguado, P. Pilet, G. Daculsi, Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth, Biomaterials 19 (1998) 133-139.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00180-4

Google Scholar

[7] K.A. Hing, S.M. Best, W. Bonfield, Characterization of porous hydroxyapatite, J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Med. 10 (1999) 135-145.

Google Scholar

[8] J.R. Woodard, A.J. Hilldore, S.K. Lan, C.J. Park, A.W. Morgan, J.A.C. Eurell, S.G. Clark, M.B. Wheeler, R.D. Jamison, A.J. Wagoner Johnson, The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity, Biomaterials 28 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.021

Google Scholar

[9] J.T. Zhang, F. Tancret, J.M. Bouler, Fabrication and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements (CPC) for bone substitution, Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 31 (2011) 740-747.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2010.10.014

Google Scholar

[10] E. Charriere et al, Mechanical characterization of brushite and hydroxyapatite cements, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 2937-2945.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00041-2

Google Scholar

[11] H. Xu, E.F. Burguera, L.E. Carey, Strong, macroporous, and in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement-layered structures, Biomaterials 28 (2007) 3786-3796.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.015

Google Scholar

[12] A.J. Wagoner Johnson, B.A. Herschler, A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair, Acta Biomater. 7 (2011) 16-30.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.012

Google Scholar

[13] I. Dlouhy, M. Holzmann, J. Man, L. Valka, The use of chevron notched specimen for fracture toughness determination, Metal. Mater 32 (1994) 3-13.

Google Scholar

[14] W. Weibull, A statistical distribution function of wide applicability, J. Appl. Mech 18 (1951) 293-305.

Google Scholar

[15] H. Monma, S. Ueno, T. Kanazawa, Properties of hydroxyapatite prepared by the hydrolysis of tricalcium phosphate, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 31 (1981) 15-24.

DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280310105

Google Scholar

[16] K.J. Koester, J.W. Ager, R.O. Ritchie, The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks, Nat. Mater. 7 (2008) 672-677.

DOI: 10.1038/nmat2221

Google Scholar

[17] F. Pecqueux, F. Tancret, N. Payraudeau, J.M. Bouleret, Influence of microporosity and macroporosity on the mechanical properties of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics: Modelling and experiment, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 30 (2010) 819-829.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.09.017

Google Scholar