Comparative Study on Parametric Analysis of μEDM of Non-Conductive Ceramics

Abstract:

Characterized by excellent material properties such has high mechanical, thermal and chemical stability technical ceramics such as ZrO₂, SiC, Si₃N₄ and AlN are increasingly being used for various applications. Traditional means of machining sintered ceramics are expensive and limited by geometry. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) is an electro-thermal machining process used to structure conductive materials. By applying a conductive layer (denoted as assisting electrode) on top of the non-conductive material, the EDM process can also be used to structure insulating ceramics. This paper presents a comparative study on the major machining parameters affecting the µEDM process of non-conductive SiC, ZrO₂, Si₃N₄ and AlN ceramics. The influence of five major machining parameters (current, open-circuit voltage, gap voltage, duty-cycle and servo) over two responses (material removal rate (MRR) and tool wear rate) is investigated for each ceramics material. The underlying reason for the variation in the MRR among the different ceramics is examined by comparing the material properties. Melting point of the ceramics material has an effect on the MRR for the µEDM of different ceramics. The bulk resistance value of the ceramic material does not have an influence on the MRR for the µEDM of different ceramics. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the cross section of the unprocessed and µEDM processed surface of these ceramics have been analyzed. The SEM micrographs show that the µEDM process does not affect the ceramics bulk. It also confirmed spalling as one of the dominant material removal mechanism for ZrO₂ ceramics.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 611-612)
• Pages: 693-700
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.693
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Nirdesh Ojha*, Florian Zeller, Claas Müller, Holger Reinecke
• Keywords: Si₃N₄, µEDM, Aluminum Nitride (AlN), Design of Experiment (DOE), EDM, Non-Conductive Ceramics, Parametric Analysis, Silicon Carbide (SiC), Zro₂

References

[1] D. D. DiBitonto, P. T. Eubank, M. R. Patel, and M. A. Barrufet, Theoretical models of the electrical discharge machining process. I. A simple cathode erosion model, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 66, no. 9, (1989) 4095-4103.

DOI: 10.1063/1.343994

[2] N. Mohri, Y. Fukuzawa, T. Tani, N. Saito, and K. Furutani, Assisting Electrode Method for Machining Insulating Ceramics, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., vol. 45, no. 1, (1996) 201–204.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63047-9

[3] T. Lee and W. Lau, Some characteristics of electrical discharge machining of conductive ceramics, Mater. Manuf. Process, vol. 6, no. 4, (1991) 635–648.

DOI: 10.1080/10426919108934794

[4] B. Lauwers, J. Kruth, W. Liu, W. Eeraerts, B. Schacht, and P. Bleys, Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials, J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 149, no. 1–3, (2004) 347–352.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.02.013

[5] N. Ojha, T. Hösel, C. Müller, and H. Reinecke, Characterization of the conductive layer formed during µ-electric discharge machining of non-conductive ceramics, Materials Science and Technology (MS&T) 2012, (2012) 423–428.

DOI: 10.1002/9781118744109.ch12

[6] N. Ojha, T. Hoesel, F. Zeller, C. Müller, and H. Reinecke, Major parameters affecting the electric discharge machining of non-conductive SiC, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Multi-Material Micro Manufacture, vol. 07, S. Azcárate and S. Dimov, Eds. Research Publishing, (2013).

DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-7247-5-356

[7] N. Ojha, C. Müller, and H. Reinecke, Parametric analysis of µ-Electric Discharge Machining of non-conductive Si3N4, submitted to Applied Mechanics and Materials (2014); Trans Tech Publications.

[8] J. Antony, Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, 6th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, (2008).