Microstructural Unit Controlling Cleavage Crack Propagation in High Strength Bainitic Steels

Abstract:

The strengthening mechanisms which are operative in bainite are very well known: small bainite packet, small width of the laths, dislocation density and size and number of carbide particles (Fe₃C), among others. Bainite packet size has been traditionally considered as the value measured by optical microscopy (OM), as electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) technique is relatively recent. In a V-microalloyed steel with bainitic microstructure of C=0.38%, V=0.12% and N= 0.0214% the average length and width of ferrite laths and of cementite carbides were measured. On the other hand, the bainite packet size was measured by OM and EBSD with a misorientation of 15o. These values of the microstructural units have been taken in account to calculate the effective surface energy γ_p given by Griffith’s model for cleavage fracture. It was concluded that bainite packet size determined by EBSD with a misorientation angle criterion of 15o was the microstructural parameter that controls cleavage crack propagation. Given the relationship between the average unit crack path (UCP) and the bainite packet size, it was concluded that the effective surface energy of cleavage fracture (γ_p) would be between 71.6 and 82.6 J m^-2.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 622-623)
• Pages: 846-853
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.846
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Sebastián F. Medina, Lucía Rancel, Manuel Gómez, Jose María Cabrera, Isabel Gutiérrez
• Keywords: Bainite Packet, EBSD, Misorientation Angle, Unit Crack Path

References

[1] H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Bainite in steels", 2nd edn, Institute of Materials, London, (2001).

[2] R.W.K. Honeycombe, F.B. Pickering, Ferrite and bainite in alloy steels, Metall. Trans. A 3 (1972) 1099-1112.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02642441

[3] P. Brozzo, G. Buzzichelli, A. Mascanzoni, M. Mirabile, Microstructure and cleavage resistance of low carbon bainitic steels, Metal Sci. 11 (1977) 123-29.

DOI: 10.1179/msc.1977.11.4.123

[4] M.E. Bush, P.M. Kelly, Strengthening mechanisms in bainitic steels, Acta Metall. 19 (1971) 1363-1371.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(71)90074-5

[5] D.W. Smith, R.F. Hehemann, The influence of structural parameters on the yield strength of tempered martensite and lower bainite, JISI Institute 209 (1971) 476-481.

[6] A. Di Schino, C. Guarnaschelli, Effect of microstructure on cleavage resistance of high strength quenched and tempered steels, Mater. Letters 63 (2009) 1968-(1972).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.06.032

[7] L. Rancel, M. Gómez, S.F. Medina, I. Gutierrez, Measurement of bainite packet size and its influence on cleavage fracture in a medium carbon bainitic steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 530 (2011) 21-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.001

[8] S. Deke, L. Hai, C. Qiang, Cleavage fracture in high carbon bainite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 158 (1992) 11-19.

DOI: 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90130-s

[9] W. Yang, B. Lee, Y. Oh, M. Huh, J. Hong, Microstructural parameters governing cleavage fracture behaviors in the ductile-brittle transition region in reactor pressure vessel steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 379 (2004) 17-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.289

[10] L. Rancel, M. Gómez, S.F. Medina, Influence of microalloying elements (Nb, V, Ti) on yield strength in bainitic steels, Steel Res. Int. 79 (2008) 947-953.

DOI: 10.1002/srin.200806225

[11] C. Cabus, H. Réglé, B. Bacroix, Orientation relationship between austenite and bainite in a multiphased steel, Mater. Charact. 58 (2007) 332-338.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.05.016

[12] J. Wang, S. Van der Zwaag, Z. Yang, H.S. Fang, Aspect ratio of bainite in steels, Mater. Lett. 45 (2000) 228-234.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(00)00110-5

[13] G.R. Irwin, Fracturing of Metals, American Society for Metals, (1948).