Dissemination of Micro-Gram Weights from 500 μg to 50μg Based on Automatic Mass Measuring System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microgram weights have a wide range of applications in the mechanical testing of bio-material sensors and nanotechnology market which typically involves the manufacture of objects with dimensions of less than 100 nanometers. Now it is available with a calibration certificate in National Institute of Metrology (China) that customers can be assured of full traceability to the national primary standard of mass, NO.60, which make allow customers with specialized nanotechnology applications to use the weight values range from 0.05 mg to 0.5 mg with standard uncertainty of just 0.3 μg to 0.08μg.In the paper, an effective method was developed to calibrate weights, along with new methods of calculating uncertainties that would satisfy OIML R111 requirements. This new calibration method involved comparing the weights with the 1 mg standard mass standards using a combination of subdivision and substitution weighing scheme.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 645-646)

Pages:

693-697

Citation:

Online since:

May 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X.P. Ren, J. Wang, R. L. Zhong, et al. Some Issues in Magnetic Measurement of Mass Standards[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013(631-632): 837-841.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.631-632.837

Google Scholar

[2] Xiao Ping Ren, Jian Wang, Yue Zhang, Wilson Ombati. Calibration of Weights and Weight Sets Based on Micro-Mass Standard Measurement System. Key Engineering Materials, 2014, (Volumes 609 - 610), 1473-1477.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.609-610.1473

Google Scholar

[3] M. S. Kim, J. R. Pratt. SI traceability: Current status and future trends for forces below 10 micro-Newtons [J]. Measurement, 2010, 43: 169-182.

DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.09.005

Google Scholar

[4] D.B. Newell, J.A. Kramar, J. R. Pratt, et al. The NIST Microforce Realization and Measurement Project [J]. IEEE Transactions on instrumentation and measurement, 2003, 52(2): 508-511.

DOI: 10.1109/tim.2003.810032

Google Scholar

[5] T. Madec,G. Mann P.A. Meury, et al. Micro-mass standards to calibrate the sensitivity of mass comparators[J]. Metrologia, 2007, 44: 266-274.

DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/44/5/002

Google Scholar

[6] T. Madec, M. Gaëlle, P. A. Meury. Extension of dissemination of mass unit between 1 mg and 100 μg [J]. Revue Française de métrologie, 2011(27) 3: 29-38.

DOI: 10.1051/rfm/2011011

Google Scholar

[7] M. S. Kim, J. H. Choi, Y. K. Park. Test of a microbalance below 1 mg using the electrostatic load and micro weights[C]. Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Symposium on Mass, Force and Torque (APMF 2007), 2007, 142-146.

Google Scholar

[8] Chung J W, Lee S J, and Kim K P. Establishment of mass standards from 1 mg to 50 μg [C]. Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Symposium on Measurement of Mass, Force, Torque. 2009, 66-70.

Google Scholar

[9] X.P. Ren, J. Wang, H. Yao, et al. Review of microgram standards metrology. Journal of Huazhong university of science and technology (nature science edition), 2012, 40(II): 91-97.

Google Scholar

[10] YAO Hong, REN Xiao-ping, WANG Jian, Zhong Rui-lin, Ding Jing-an. Recent Research on the Automated Mass Measuring System. International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series on Measurement of Mass, Force and Torque (APMF 2013), 24, 1360003, 1-6.

DOI: 10.1142/s2010194513600033

Google Scholar

[11] Arthur R. A new mass comparator generation for the automatic calibration of weight sets[C]. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on force, mass, torque and pressure measurements, IMEKO 2001, 17-21, 310-319.

Google Scholar

[12] Masaaki U., Kazunaga U. Uncertainty evaluation on the fully-automated sub-multiple calibration in the milligram range[C]. Proceedings of SICE annual conference 2007, 17-20, Ibaraki, 2007, 24-28.

DOI: 10.1109/sice.2007.4420944

Google Scholar