The Effect of Solid-to-Liquid Ratio and Temperature on Mechanical Properties of Kaolin Geopolymer Ceramics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of solid-to-liquid ratio and temperature on the mechanical properties of kaolin geopolymer ceramics are studied. Kaolin and alkaline activator were mixed with the solid-to-liquid ratio in the range of 0.8-1.2. Alkaline activator was formed by mixing the 12 M NaOH solution with sodium silicate at a ratio of 0.24. Kaolin geopolymer ceramic have been produced by using powder metallurgy (PM) technique. The samples were heated at different temperature started from 900 °C until 1200 °C and the strength were tested. The relative density and flexural strength of sintered sample range approximately 84%-95% and 20-90 MPa respectively. The result revealed that the optimum flexural strength was obtained at solid-to-liquid ratio of 1.0 and the samples heated at 1200 °C achieved the highest flexural strength (90 MPa).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

23-27

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Songpiriyakij, T. Kubprasit, C. Jaturapitakkul, and P. Chindaprasirt: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 24 (2007), p.236.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. M. Liew, H. Kamarudin, A. M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C. M. Ruzaidi and C. Y. Heah: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 37 (2012), p.440.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.075

Google Scholar

[3] V.F.F. Barbosa and K.J.D. Mackenzie: Materials Letter, Vol. 57 (2003), p.1477.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Duxson, G.C. Lukey, and J.S.J. Van Deventer: J. Non-Crystalline Sol. Vol. 352 (2006), p.5541.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Duxson, G. C. Lukey and J.S.J. Van daventer: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 42(9) (2007), p.5541.

Google Scholar

[6] L. J. Bell, E. P. Driemeyer and M. W. Kriven: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 92 (2009), p.1.

Google Scholar

[7] V.F.F. Barbosa and K.J.D. Mackenzie: Mater. Res. Bull. Vol. 38(2) (2003), p.319.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Davidovits: J. Therm. Anal. Vol. 37 (1991), p.1633.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Davidovits: 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer application, Geopolymer 2002 Conference. Saint-Quentin (France), Melbourne (Australia): Geopolymer Institute (2002).

Google Scholar

[10] J. Davidovits in: Geopolymer Chemistry and Application, 2nd Edition. Saint-Quentin, France: Institute of geopolymer (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] J. N. Ain, A. M. Mustafa AlBakri, C. M. Ruzaidi, M. Binhussain, H. kamarudin, A. Romisuhani and J. E. Januarti: Appl. Mech. Mater. Vol. 152 (2015), p.754.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. M. Liew,H. Kamarudin, A. M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C. M. Ruzaidi and C. Y. Heah: Phy. Proc. Vol. 22 (2011), p.312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.102

Google Scholar